Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(59,027 posts)
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 08:31 AM Nov 6

OpenAI walks back comments about government support for its AI spending

Source: MarketWatch

How OpenAI plans to pay for spending plans that dwarf its revenue is a big question these days. But after suggesting Wednesday that perhaps the government could get involved, the company is now walking back those comments.

CFO Sarah Friar said at the Wall Street Journal’s Tech Live event on Wednesday that the ChatGPT creator was “looking for an ecosystem of banks, private equity, maybe even governmental” partners, as she mused about “the ways governments can come to bear.”

-snip-



Read more: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-will-openai-cover-its-heavy-spending-it-now-suggests-maybe-the-government-could-help-e1ca64f5



She wasn't misunderstood yesterday - what they wanted was clearly understood by the tech and financial experts who heard about this first. But the backlash was apparently much worse than they'd expected. So after yesterday's stories about their plan to shift financial responsibility for their insane recklessness to the American people, the new stories this morning are about the backpedaling.

As the Economic Times pointed out - https://m.economictimes.com/tech/artificial-intelligence/openai-seeks-government-backing-to-boost-ai-investments/articleshow/125123217.cms - the proposal was "unusual for a Silicon Valley tech giant" and meant OpenAI would be able to borrow even more money more easily because "the government would absorb losses if the company defaulted."

This is what AI expert Gary Marcus wrote yesterday about what OpenAI wants - and what he'd predicted early this year would happen - as the AI bubble looks more and more dangerous:

https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/if-you-thought-the-2008-bank-bailout

A few days ago, Sam Altman got seriously pissed off when Brad Gerstner had the temerity to ask how OpenAI was going to pay the $1.4 trillion in obligations he was taking on, given a mere $13 billion in revenue.

In a long, but mostly empty answer Altman pointed to revenue that hasn’t been reported and that maybe doesn’t exist, attacked the questioner, and promised that future revenue would be awsome

-snip-

What Altman couldn’t say then was that he has a plan, to reduce the cost of his borrowing … by having the American taxpayer (indirectly) foot the bill.

The cat came out of the bag today, at a Wall Street Journal conference, from the mouth of OpenAI’s CFO, who seemed to be test-piloting the notion:

-snip-
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
OpenAI walks back comments about government support for its AI spending (Original Post) highplainsdem Nov 6 OP
Fuck that! The government and we should not be obligating ourselves in such a reckless and destructive way. lark Nov 6 #1
I believe AI is headed for a crash, along with their Crypto buddies. Martin68 Nov 6 #2
Why should the government Miguelito Loveless Nov 6 #3
She wasn't supposed to say that out loud, but... LudwigPastorius Nov 6 #4

lark

(25,707 posts)
1. Fuck that! The government and we should not be obligating ourselves in such a reckless and destructive way.
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 09:41 AM
Nov 6

Why should my tax dollars guarantee a return for the ultra rich and trumpists? NO!!!!!!!!!

LudwigPastorius

(13,810 posts)
4. She wasn't supposed to say that out loud, but...
Thu Nov 6, 2025, 03:36 PM
Nov 6

she is absolutely right that the government will go all in on AI research.

Right or wrong, many believe that the strategic military advantage held by the first country to achieve AGI would be insurmountable. Ergo, the U.S. must get there before China.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»OpenAI walks back comment...