OpenAI walks back comments about government support for its AI spending
Source: MarketWatch
How OpenAI plans to pay for spending plans that dwarf its revenue is a big question these days. But after suggesting Wednesday that perhaps the government could get involved, the company is now walking back those comments.
CFO Sarah Friar said at the Wall Street Journals Tech Live event on Wednesday that the ChatGPT creator was looking for an ecosystem of banks, private equity, maybe even governmental partners, as she mused about the ways governments can come to bear.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-will-openai-cover-its-heavy-spending-it-now-suggests-maybe-the-government-could-help-e1ca64f5
She wasn't misunderstood yesterday - what they wanted was clearly understood by the tech and financial experts who heard about this first. But the backlash was apparently much worse than they'd expected. So after yesterday's stories about their plan to shift financial responsibility for their insane recklessness to the American people, the new stories this morning are about the backpedaling.
As the Economic Times pointed out - https://m.economictimes.com/tech/artificial-intelligence/openai-seeks-government-backing-to-boost-ai-investments/articleshow/125123217.cms - the proposal was "unusual for a Silicon Valley tech giant" and meant OpenAI would be able to borrow even more money more easily because "the government would absorb losses if the company defaulted."
This is what AI expert Gary Marcus wrote yesterday about what OpenAI wants - and what he'd predicted early this year would happen - as the AI bubble looks more and more dangerous:
https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/if-you-thought-the-2008-bank-bailout
In a long, but mostly empty answer Altman pointed to revenue that hasnt been reported and that maybe doesnt exist, attacked the questioner, and promised that future revenue would be awsome
-snip-
What Altman couldnt say then was that he has a plan, to reduce the cost of his borrowing by having the American taxpayer (indirectly) foot the bill.
The cat came out of the bag today, at a Wall Street Journal conference, from the mouth of OpenAIs CFO, who seemed to be test-piloting the notion:
-snip-
lark
(25,707 posts)Why should my tax dollars guarantee a return for the ultra rich and trumpists? NO!!!!!!!!!
Martin68
(26,632 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(5,356 posts)invest in a technology that will destroy the world economy?
LudwigPastorius
(13,810 posts)she is absolutely right that the government will go all in on AI research.
Right or wrong, many believe that the strategic military advantage held by the first country to achieve AGI would be insurmountable. Ergo, the U.S. must get there before China.