Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

barbtries

(30,978 posts)
Tue Nov 4, 2025, 04:41 AM Nov 4

Trial starts for assault case against D.C. man who tossed sandwich at federal agent in viral video

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Yonnie3 (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: PBS.org

WASHINGTON (AP) — Throwing a sandwich at a federal agent turned Sean Charles Dunn into a symbol of resistance against President Donald Trump’s law-enforcement surge in the nation’s capital. This week, federal prosecutors are trying to persuade a jury of fellow Washington, D.C., residents that Dunn simply broke the law.

That could be a tough sell for the government in a city that has chafed against Trump’s federal takeover, which is entering its third month. A grand jury refused to indict Dunn on a felony assault count before U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office opted to charge him instead with a misdemeanor.

Read more: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/trial-starts-for-assault-case-against-d-c-man-who-tossed-sandwich-at-federal-agent-in-viral-video



One way krasnov and company are wasting taxpayer dollars. Even if convicted, I can't imagine him being forced to spend another minute in jail.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trial starts for assault case against D.C. man who tossed sandwich at federal agent in viral video (Original Post) barbtries Nov 4 OP
Either acquittal or jury nullification no_hypocrisy Nov 4 #1
Locking - Duplicate Yonnie3 Nov 4 #2

no_hypocrisy

(53,773 posts)
1. Either acquittal or jury nullification
Tue Nov 4, 2025, 04:44 AM
Nov 4

Jury nullification, also known as jury equity or as a perverse verdict, is a decision by the jury in a criminal trial resulting in a verdict of not guilty even though they think a defendant has broken the law. The jury's reasons may include the belief that the law itself is unjust, that the prosecutor has misapplied the law in the defendant's case, that the punishment for breaking the law is too harsh, or general frustrations with the criminal justice system. It has been commonly used to oppose what jurors perceive as unjust laws, such as those that once penalized runaway slaves under the Fugitive Slave Act, prohibited alcohol during Prohibition, or criminalized draft evasion during the Vietnam War. Some juries have also refused to convict due to their own prejudices in favor of the defendant. Such verdicts are possible because a jury has an absolute right to return any verdict it chooses.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification

Yonnie3

(19,071 posts)
2. Locking - Duplicate
Tue Nov 4, 2025, 06:32 AM
Nov 4

Please continue discussion at the earlier post https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143558558

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trial starts for assault ...