scotus"

I wish that was a joke.

Real, right????

such as suspension, or better, disbarment.

is indictable.

have a better chance of someone hitting on her license. IMHO

"Accordingly, Petitioners have established undue delay in resolution of their motions to intervene and the petitions for writs of mandamus are HELD IN ABEYANCE for a period of 60 days to allow the district court to fully resolve the motions."
.............

Or does the GOP DOJ get involved?

So about 02 January…?

And if she doesn’t…?

At which time, the parties seeking release of the report will appeal that decision to the 11th Circuit, which may or may not reverse Cannon, but probably won't do so for months and months.

The order from the 11th Circuit doesn't compel her to grant the motions seeking release of the report.

What prevents Smith from just releasing it himself -- as a memoir if necessary.

He can not legally release it on his own.

He can certainly go on TV shows and talk about what he found. He can write his memoirs including what he found. There is nothing illegal about that. He can't disclose classified information, but Trump said he declassified all of it, so that isn't an issue.

And if she doesn't release the remaining parts of special counsel Smith's report of the mishandling of classified documents. by trump. what will happens to her, not a damn thing.

According to Raw Story, 'the appeals court ordered Cannon to stop delaying the report's release.'

But, in fact, all the 11th Circuit did was order Cannon to resolve the motions seeking the report's release within 60 days. The 11th Circuit order does not compel Cannon to grant the motion for the report's release.

From the order -

That’s the characterization of the 11th circuit order from a group that has more expertise in such matters than Raw Story. And saying there has been “undue delay” by Cannon in taking up the pending motions is not a “slam” — it’s a recitation of the minimum legal standard for mandanus—and even though the minimum standard was met, the court of appeals still gave Cannon another60 days—hardly a “slam” against her.

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/appeals-court-puts-cannon-on-the-clock-regarding-jack-smith-report-or-else-extraordinary-relief-will-follow/amp/

I use "Law & Crime" extensively as a source, mainly because about 90% of the time, they will link to the court filings and I can include them in the OPs.

They were LATE doing their article on this subject (I saw it hours after I posted this, i.e., it wasn't "publicly" linked/featured on either their main page or under their "High Profile" category at a time corresponding to the date/timestamp they list for publication - something that is common among too many news sites), but in their article, they also have this -