I have take tylenol. I have congestive heart failure and can't take ibuprofen. Can only take a little bit of aspirin.

Autism was 1st diagnosed in the early 1900s and Tylenol was not made until the 1940s or ‘50s.

It’s been attributed to genius, to idiocy, and to madness over the centuries.

first diagnosed as a separate condition in 1943. Although the drug wa produced in in 1955, J&J bought the McNeil company in 1959, and tylenol became available over the counter in 1960.

I think we might be seeing more cases of Autism and its spectrum as the diagnosing of it gets better.

found. krasnov knows this. .do not forget his comments about, and refusal to fund, testing for covid.

…. dealing with and treating C-19. And why did he and other scientists do that? Because as they learned
more about the virus, the disease, and vaccines the data changed so they changed what they doing.

And where did these right wing anti science mouth breathers get their misinformation? Russia.

Last edited Tue Oct 28, 2025, 08:17 AM - Edit history (1)

Paxton is a maniac. It must be terrible to live in a place where you don’t trust anybody.

just a bandwagon to jump on pay attention to me right wing grift maybe someone will bribe me etc etc etc

I'm under the impression that this is another insane conspiracy from the heroine ravaged mind of Kennedy, but is there any basis in fact?

Acetaminophen exhausts the body's supply of glutathione and then can reach toxic levels quickly.

ASD aside, Tylenol is a leading cause of ER admissions -- 56,000 per year. Not as safe as most believe.

primarily recognized as an internet personality. And his medcram channel is apparently a very expensive course, although I was not able to find the board certifications for it on a cursory search.

1. Internal Medicine,
2. Pulmonary Diseases,
3. Critical Care Medicine and
4. Sleep Medicine through the American Board of Internal Medicine

His current practice is in Beaumont, California where he is a critical care physician, pulmonologist, and sleep physician at Beaver Medical Group. He was formerly the Director for Intensive Care Services at San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital. He lectures routinely across the country at conferences and for medical, PA, and RT societies. He graduated Magna Cum Laude with majors in Chemistry and Biology. Both of his parents were medical doctors.

>his medcram channel is apparently a very expensive course< ??

Courses are $85 each or $229 per year for unlimited. Continuing Education is required for most medical doctors and MedCram courses are accredited for Category 1 CME, MOC Points, CE, & CRCE. His courses are among the lowest priced in the industry despite the high quality and are regularly used by entire hospitals and groups including Loma Linda University School of Medicine, and UC Riverside School of Medicine because the instructors, like Seheult are the top in their field and hail from Stanford University School of Medicine, John Hopkins, National Institutes of Health , La Jolla Institute for Immunology, Center for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital and others.

https://www.medcram.com/pages/instructors

He worked his ass off in ER and the ICU throughout the peak of Covid19. His passion is to make health education free and understandable to all.

So do you still think Seheult is "primarily...an internet personality"?


NPR:
https://www.npr.org/2020/10/25/927564413/researchers-learning-more-about-how-the-coronavirus-sabotages-blood-vessels?fbclid=IwAR09HbP10NTX_vX7mTqnr3E73TxoJgCNOqIn7Ot9hTfUyBnWV5jceRQJ5Q8

well aware of his credentials, since I did actually look them up, and not simply go by the first thing I saw. And the comment about the expense was not mine, but in some of the reviews of that youtube channel, so kindly skip the snide questions, and implied insult.

I will remind you that mehmet oz also had excellent credentials, and was once highly regarded. Am I putting seheult in the same category? Not without further information, which, for all I know, would show him exactly as you see him.

If 4 active certifications from major healthcare institutions and having hundreds of practicing medical doctors as clients are not proof enough of his reputation and qualifications then perhaps something else is your issue here.

My family is full of health care professionals -- MDs, LNPs. My BIL is a GP who does pro bono and sliding scale work for clients that can't afford the broken US medical system. My first spouse was an LNP who got his certifications in 1985 at age 46 because other doctors would not care for AIDS patients. He wound up doing a lot of hospice. An incredibly strong and hard working person. Seheult worked ER and ICU in Riverside CA at height of covid. I am tired of people attacking medical professionals whenever they don't like what the science says. It is a logical fallacy to think that an ad hom on one medical educator "debunks" meta analysis done by dozens of certified professionals in dozens of countries.

If you had watched even 2 mins of Seheult and you would have seen why he is trusted and paid by hundreds of doctors and medical institutions to do their Continuing Education.

>the comment about the expense was not mine< ?? "I will remind you" that you posted it.

You are an intelligent person so you have to know what an insult it is to be compared to Oz who does multi-level marketing (ugh) and sells snake oil DTP.

credentials. And any serious medical professional who swallowed the horse paste bullshit for even a minute has lost credibility in my book. Your posts seem to indicate some serious investment in his reputation, so I will not trouble you further.

disorders can arise during pregnancy. He includes studies that found no correlation, studies with negative correlation and studies with positive correlation.

Correlation is, of course, not causation and Seheult goes through the proposed mechanisms (causation) by which acetaminophen can contribute to the development of ASD. He cites meta analysis (a study of studies, the gold standard) which incorporates the study you mention. The meta analysis was done by Diddier Prada, Beate Ritz, Ann Z. Bauer & Andrea A. Baccarelli and includes the 2.5 million of the smaller study.

The meta analysis was reprinted by Harvard and other major health institutions:
https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/using-acetaminophen-during-pregnancy-may-increase-childrens-autism-and-adhd-risk/

The lengthy study is summarized by the authors as follows:

Maybe your post was sarcastic but, in case it isn't, you should be aware that this guy is a quack. He was promoting the hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin nonsense as well as many other unproven "treatments." He's just barely above the level of trustworthiness than bob jr. himself.

The guy is a quack Ivermectin does nothing with COVID or other diseases Has this quack published any peer reviewed reports A quack with degrees is a still a quack. Show us some peer reviewed studies to support this quack’s insane claims

It seemss he now recommends sunlight and hydrotherapy,, followed by a brief, cold shock.

lawsuit without any evidence.

Loves to waste texas taxpayer money on frivolous lawsuit, and will only go in front of his favorite judges to have the cases heard. I lost track of how many lawsuits he filed against Obama and Biden over some policy of theirs he didn't like.

Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) was first made in 1878 by Harmon Northrop Morse or possibly in 1852 by Charles Frédéric Gerhardt. It is the most commonly used medication for pain and fever in both the United States and Europe.[48] It is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines. Paracetamol is available as a generic medication, with brand names including Tylenol and Panadol among others. In 2023, it was the 112th most commonly prescribed medication in the United States, with more than 5 million prescriptions.

Help me out folks---which one of these guys should I be relying on for critical medical advice?

I knew it would be bad, but I never dreamed it would sink to this level. I want my country back, by whatever means necessary.

Part of this message is: "Pregnant women, when you feel pain suck it up." Of course. If this were about men's pain, this wouldn't be happening.

What a crude, obnoxious thing to say even for Trump.

They are so spectacularly stupid - this will show the world the true magat stupidity and will get laughed at madly!

If they can prove their claims in court.

He’s like Gov Abbott, it’s all performative with no substance. They’re a menace.

Paxton's doing this for fluff and color and perv-cred, but he pulls the idiot antivaxxers along with him.

not yet eaten.

for an affair with a religious "influencer" and mom of around six or seven kids (she was married too). Part of his impeachment proceedings dealt with a previous affair of his, trying to pressure state workers to employ his mistress.

Messy stuff in TX this past summer.

???

He wants to run for the US Senate… he is just a major crook, he should actually be in jail. Typical GOP from Texas.

He made that stupid announcement.

because in Texas he knows he has a captive audience. So embarrassing.

Lawsuit has no merit.

Welcome to DU, Anxy. 👋

Good heavens, I'm SO embarrassed for my beloved Texas.

Who will be the medical experts that he will call?

Trump and RFK Jr do not qualify.

Not sure why Tylenol not pursuing legal remedies against the Trump administration.

Suck Donvicts d!€k any harder????????

There is no real science to support this lawsuit

Link to tweet

I asked John Cornyn about this and he said about Paxton suing Tylenol’s company
“He wants to line the pockets of every trial lawyer in the state. He ran off all of his professional staff, and now he has to hire trial lawyers, so and they're some of his biggest supporters.”

— Eric Michael Garcia (@ericmgarcia.bsky.social) 2025-10-28T18:10:47.877Z

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is suing Johnson and Johnson, the makers of Tylenol

— Phil Lewis (@phillewis.bsky.social) 2025-10-28T13:39:55.916Z

...would probably seek guidance from him on adhering to marital fidelity.

Link to tweet

and actively hid them? Or is this meant to assume (without proof) that Tylenol causes autism, and then Johnson & Johnson is being asked to "prove a negative" ???

Proving-a-negative isn't how our court system is supposed to work, right? The person making the positive assertion must prove it's true. The accused doesn't need to prove it to be false, right?

I do not think that Texas will be successful at doing anything other than making lawyers rich and intentionally harming the reputation of the company and the product. They will be the equivalent of the fellow who put cyanide in Tylenol capsules back in the early 80's.

Sue for 1 BILLION dollars Edit to add I mean sue him personally, plus the state of TEXAS.