Justice Elena Kagan Warns Supreme Court Conservatives Just Went 'Too Far'
Source: Newsweek
PUBLISHED Sep 26, 2025 at 06:28 PM EDT
UPDATED Sep 26, 2025 at 06:47 PM EDT
The Supreme Court on Friday extended an order allowing President Donald Trumps administration to keep nearly $5 billion in foreign aid frozen, a decision that drew a sharp rebuke from Justice Elena Kagan, who said the conservative majority had gone too far.
With the three liberal justices in dissent, the courts conservatives granted the administrations emergency appeal in a case involving billions of dollars that Congress had already approved. Trump announced last month that he would not spend the money, invoking a disputed authority known as a pocket rescission, a budgetary maneuver last used by a president roughly 50 years ago.
The unsigned order said Trumps foreign affairs authority weighed heavily in the decision but emphasized that it was not a final ruling. Still, the courts action ensures the aid will remain blocked while the case continues through lower courts.
Why It Matters
The decision is the latest in a string of victories for Trump at the high court, many of them through emergency appeals that bypass the usual lengthy process. The court has previously allowed the administration to restrict protections for migrants, remove federal employees, and fire leaders of independent agencies.
Read more: https://www.newsweek.com/kagan-warns-supreme-court-foreign-aid-trump-admin-10791871

Karma13612
(4,818 posts)And as an aside, what if Trump decides he wants to up the ante on punishment in this country?
Lets say he decides that corporal punishment is back on the table? Just a little taste of Gilead?
From what I can see, SCOTUS is not protecting the US Constitution. Why protect us from cruel and unusual punishment? Remember, Trump said women should be punished for getting abortions. He is a cruel narcissist.
What if he decides that unacceptable speech is punishable by Singapore or Iran methods like a few lashes?
Where does SCOTUS draw the line on looking the other way???
MadameButterfly
(3,581 posts)Under an autocracy judges do what the dictator says. You would think they'd have figured that out by now.
Evolve Dammit
(21,246 posts)PuraVidaDreamin
(4,356 posts)In the Epstein files?
Bengus81
(9,449 posts)Buddyzbuddy
(1,549 posts)In the face of obvious defeat with no hope in sight, they have mastered the art of using public opinion to fight back.
You don't have to win, you just have to not give up.
That's all we ask. Eventually you will win. As long as you can breathe, you give us all a chance to win, as long as you fight.
Cheezoholic
(3,313 posts)BumRushDaShow
(160,717 posts)only a drop in the bucket have been taken all the way to the SCOTUS "shadow docket". So for the most part, 45 has LOST most of those lower (including appellate) court rulings.
Six117
(284 posts)Complicit.
bluestarone
(20,369 posts)Same time to WARN Americans as to what's at stake here in our great country. (use to be great country)
mdbl
(7,435 posts)