Trump Threatens Licenses of TV Stations That Criticize Him
Source: Bloomberg
There's a paywall so I can't read it but this article was linked below this Bluesky post
"Headlines on the Bloomberg Terminal from Air Force One:
*TRUMP: TV LICENSES SHOULD BE TAKEN AWAY IF BAD PUBLICITY FOR ME
*TRUMP: IF TV SHOWS 'HIT TRUMP' SHOULD BE DISCUSSED ON LICENSES
*TRUMP ON TV SHOWS CRITICIZING HIM: THEY'RE NOT ALLOWED TO"
Headlines on the Bloomberg Terminal from Air Force One:
— Thomas Seal (@twseal.bsky.social) 2025-09-18T18:02:00.533Z
*TRUMP: TV LICENSES SHOULD BE TAKEN AWAY IF BAD PUBLICITY FOR ME
*TRUMP: IF TV SHOWS 'HIT TRUMP' SHOULD BE DISCUSSED ON LICENSES
*TRUMP ON TV SHOWS CRITICIZING HIM: THEY'RE NOT ALLOWED TO
Read more: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-18/trump-says-kimmel-suspended-over-bad-ratings-not-free-speech

no_hypocrisy
(53,156 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(5,222 posts)since the election. All that was left was paperwork.
JoseBalow
(8,479 posts)
LymphocyteLover
(8,797 posts)right here in the good ol' USA.
C_U_L8R
(48,157 posts)lose your license or lose your audience.
they should have stood up to Trump long ago
now they are thoroughly fucked.
Im voting with my clicker.
dweller
(27,174 posts)littlemissmartypants
(29,878 posts)I was just about to post it. GMTA
❤️
Dave Bowman
(5,888 posts)LiberalArkie
(18,970 posts)enough
(13,622 posts)that it has to do with combating leftwing violence.
Cha
(314,583 posts)inviting this Fascist Fuck to the royal palace, Charles.
Endlessmike56
(34 posts)I just couldnt vote for a black woman President. 🤬
NoMoreRepugs
(11,637 posts)chouchou
(2,387 posts)ReRe
(12,014 posts)Well there you go. Right outta the horse's mouth into perpetuity. He can't take that back.
Place that right there in evidence, court clerk. Thank you!
mdbl
(7,422 posts)I have plenty of other sources. You ruined network television so I don't watch that anyway. Have at it you big democracy hating asshole.
topcelts
(22 posts)Stop watching Networks. Quit buying what they're selling. Money is all that talks.
DallasNE
(7,876 posts)But the Supreme Court has empowered Trump to fire for any reason whatsoever, rather than only for cause. Trump couldn't be doing this without the full support of the Supreme Court. America is in bad shape right now Very bad. And time is running out to fix it.
CaptainTruth
(7,896 posts)It has no effect on cable, streaming etc networks because they don't broadcast on frequencies owned by the US govt.
And... how many people watch broadcast TV (with an antenna & a receiver) today? 1% of all viewers?
Wiz Imp
(7,479 posts)The lone Democrat on the FCC, Anna Gomez, criticized Carr for using the weight of government power to suppress lawful expression. Gomez called ABCs decision a shameful show of cowardly corporate capitulation that threatened the first amendment, and said the FCC was operating beyond its authority and outside the bounds of the constitution.
If it were to take the unprecedented step of trying to revoke broadcast licenses, which are held by local stations rather than national networks, it would run headlong into the first amendment and fail in court on both the facts and the law, Gomez wrote in a statement. But even the threat to revoke a license is no small matter. It poses an existential risk to a broadcaster, which by definition cannot exist without its license. That makes billion-dollar companies with pending business before the agency all the more vulnerable to pressure to bend to the governments ideological demands.
CaptainTruth
(7,896 posts)travelingthrulife
(3,344 posts)This is all on the heads of the GOP. They could end his reign of terror this week if they chose to.
LymphocyteLover
(8,797 posts)FakeNoose
(38,737 posts)