Judge blocks Trump administration from immediately deporting Guatemalan migrant children
Last edited Thu Sep 18, 2025, 12:33 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: AP
Updated 11:35 AM EDT, September 18, 2025
WASHINGTON (AP) A federal judge on Thursday blocked President Donald Trumps administration from immediately deporting Guatemalan migrant children who came to the U.S. alone back to their home country, the latest step in a court struggle over one of the most sensitive issues in Trumps hard-line immigration agenda.
The decision by U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly comes after the Republican administrations Labor Day weekend attempt to remove Guatemalan migrant children who were living in government shelters and foster care.
Trump administration officials said they were seeking to reunify children with parents who wanted them returned home. But that explanation crumbled like a house of cards about a week later, Kelly wrote. There is no evidence before the Court that the parents of these children sought their return.
There was already a temporary order in place preventing the removal of Guatemalan children. But that was set to expire Tuesday. Kelly, who was appointed by Trump, granted a preliminary injunction extends that temporary protection indefinitely, although the government can appeal. Kelly did rebuff advocates push to block the removal of children from additional countries, though he said any attempt to remove those children in a similar way would likely be unlawful.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/trump-deportations-guatemalan-migrant-children-supreme-court-2bfc00faa704819f11ef472d809d6c22
Just breaking. Short article at post time.
REFERENCES
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143521663
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143527949
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143528608
Article updated.
Original article -
WASHINGTON (AP) A federal judge on Thursday blocked President Donald Trumps administration from immediately deporting Guatemalan migrant children who came to the U.S. alone back to their home country, the latest step in a court struggle over one of the most sensitive issues in Trumps hard-line immigration agenda.
The decision by U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly comes after the Republican administrations Labor Day weekend attempt to remove Guatemalan migrant children who were living in government shelters and foster care.
There was already a temporary order in place preventing the removal of Guatemalan children. But that was set to expire Tuesday. Kelly, who was appointed by Trump, granted a preliminary injunction extends that temporary protection indefinitely, although the government can appeal.
There are also temporary restraining orders in separate cases in Arizona and Illinois, but those cases are much more narrow in the scope of children they cover.

riversedge
(77,912 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(170,114 posts)Link to tweet
He said that the Trump Administration's reasoning "crumbled like a house of cards."
He's a Trump-appointed Judge! So tell me MAGA, why is wrong not to know exactly who is taking care of these children in America but perfectly fine to just send them to Guatemala where we don't even know if they have people who will care for them or if they will get trafficked?

LetMyPeopleVote
(170,114 posts)A judge appointed by the president in his first term said a government claim in seeking to send children to Guatemala turned out not to be true.
Trump-appointed judge says administrationâs court claim âcrumbled like a house of cardsâ
— Ruth Ghiorzi (@ladyruth4u.bsky.social) 2025-09-19T18:35:21Z
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/trump-judge-send-children-guatemala-immigration-rcna232405
Its against this backdrop that one of Trumps own judicial appointees said Thursday that an official explanation offered in court crumbled like a house of cards.......
His 43-page opinion contains haunting details, including excerpts of declarations from some of the children who warned of dangerous fates that would await them. One of them said the conditions she would return to in Guatemala would cause her to kill herself, Kelly wrote.
The judges stern accounting wasnt limited to the house of cards remark. He wrote elsewhere that Trump officials misstate the legal standard and that their conduct in deeming children eligible for sending to Guatemala suggested that they are not applying their criteria accurately, consistently, or in ways that reflect good faith. He further criticized the rushed, seemingly error-laden operation to send unaccompanied alien children back to their home countries, calling it one of the things that federal law seeks to prevent.
The judge wrote that officials conduct doesnt inspire confidence that they themselves are convinced that they have the authority to proceed as they would like. If they were convinced of their authority, the judge wondered, then why exercise it in the middle of the night on a holiday weekend with nothing but a late-night (or early-morning) notice to the childrens caretakers and advocates?
Why, indeed.
At a time when the administration is bending or breaking the law across various facets of American life, Kellys ruling is a reminder that at least some judges have served as a bulwark, and that they stand ready to apply the law to lawless government actions when theyre challenged in court.