Man arrested for allegedly faking confession to Charlie Kirk's killing
Source: The Guardian
Tue 16 Sep 2025 17.44 EDT
First published on Tue 16 Sep 2025 11.43 EDT
A man who was detained moments after Turning Point USA executive director Charlie Kirks killing has been arrested on allegations of trying to thwart authorities by falsely confessing to the fatal shooting.
After being arrested on Monday, 71-year-old George Zinn faces a count of obstructing justice a second-degree felony in the wake of Kirks killing at Utah Valley University (UVU). He was also booked in connection with images on his cellphone depicting child abuse, said state authorities, who took Zinn into custody after he was released from a hospital that was treating him for a medical condition.
Documents filed in Zinns case by UVU campus police allege that he began screaming, I shot him now shoot me, in the immediate aftermath of Kirks killing at Utah Valley University (UVU) on 10 September. Video of officers holding Zinn down was widely circulated online, leading some to believe that authorities had quickly arrested a suspect in the killing of the conservative political activist.
Then, when asked by an officer where the gun used to kill Kirk was, Zinn allegedly replied: I am not going to tell you. Police contend that Zinn subsequently admitted that he was not the shooter and did not know who was and he purportedly claimed that he had acted how he did to draw attention away from the real killer in hopes of becoming a martyr for Kirk. Zinn was brought to a hospital after experiencing an unspecified medical episode and told officers he was glad he said he shot the individual so the real suspect could get away, according to police documents as well as a statement from authorities.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/16/false-confession-charlie-kirk-shooting
I think this guy was the "first suspect" that got blasted out in the media.

Hugin
(36,869 posts)Events force me to spend time daily with core life long MAGAts where all they have to do all day is talk (loudly) and watch the state approved media. Not once has any aspect of the Kirk Incident come up in their routine ranting complete with every ism conceivable.
I can only conclude that the hubris surrounding the incident is an astroturfing involving the influencer/pundit/media class. The Retrumplican base is hardly engaged or vested at all and the more its pushed against the axes the base is already grinding the more likely their own base is going to push back negatively.
twodogsbarking
(15,723 posts)surfered
(9,191 posts)twodogsbarking
(15,723 posts)LeftInTX
(33,875 posts)He's considered more a of nuisance who frequently engages in disruptive behavior and disorderly conduct.