NY Times defends reporting against Trump's defamation claims
Source: Courthouse News Service
September 16, 2025
(CN) The New York Times struck back Tuesday against President Donald Trump, who claims the paper defamed him during last years election season. This lawsuit has no merit. It lacks any legitimate legal claims and instead is an attempt to stifle and discourage independent reporting," a spokesperson for the newspaper said in a statement.
The New York Times will not be deterred by intimidation tactics. We will continue to pursue the facts without fear or favor and stand up for journalists First Amendment right to ask questions on behalf of the American people. In Mondays lawsuit, Trump argued the newspaper timed stories containing disparaging statements about him to come out at the height of election season to inflict maximum electoral damage and economic harm against him.
Trump claims that to win the presidency in 2024, he had to overcome persistent election interference from the legacy media, which he said was led by The New York Times, as a full-throated mouthpiece of the Democrat Party. In his complaint, Trump points to the newspapers front-page endorsement of Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris and an opinion piece titled The only patriotic choice for president. He describes it as deranged.
Trump names Times reporters Susanne Craig, Russ Buettner, Peter Baker and Michael S. Schmidt as defendants. Penguin Random House was also named for publishing a book titled Lucky Loser: How Donald Trump Squandered His Fathers Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success, which Buettner and Craig co-wrote.
Read more: https://courthousenews.com/ny-times-defends-reporting-against-trumps-defamation-claims/

Prairie Gates
(6,252 posts)History will judge.
johnnyfins
(2,887 posts)Teacher of the Year
(208 posts)He will now have to prove all his allegations, UNDER OATH, that the Times hurt his business, his reputations, caused all this "damage" that is in his law suit. Now he has to prove the damage-every single bit.
johnnyfins
(2,887 posts)Every dirty detail of his degenerate existence, but then the almighty dollar comes in to play...
reACTIONary
(6,698 posts).... I think it will be tossed as not having any merit.
Teacher of the Year
(208 posts)They have the right to have him prove it or take it all back.
reACTIONary
(6,698 posts)IbogaProject
(4,961 posts)That is a tall order with all the accuations against Cheeto.
reACTIONary
(6,698 posts)reACTIONary
(6,698 posts).... on the lawsuit - no paywall.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/16/business/media/trump-lawsuit-new-york-times.html?unlocked_article_code=1.mk8.sPOF.2wlSNg6Nh03H&smid=url-share
A Times spox is quoted: This lawsuit has no merit. It lacks any legitimate legal claims and instead is an attempt to stifle and discourage independent reporting. The New York Times will not be deterred by intimidation tactics. We will continue to pursue the facts without fear or favor and stand up for journalists First Amendment right to ask questions on behalf of the American people.
The Times publisher called it frivolous, and warned that everyone, regardless of their politics, should be troubled by the growing anti-press campaign led by President Trump and his administration.
The book publisher, also a defendant, said This is a meritless lawsuit. Penguin Random House stands by the book and its authors and will continue to uphold the values of the First Amendment that are fundamental to our role as a book publisher.
Pas-de-Calais
(10,175 posts)So
He
Sues
To
Stop
It