He came to the fork you in the road and took the right one.

is that the Maganutz are trying to canonize this hatemonger and blame his death on people who had absolutely nothing to do with it

that might be applied is

"the actor knowingly created a great risk of death to another individual other than the deceased individual and the actor"

https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title76/Chapter5/76-5-S202.html

Anyone else see anything there for this charge?

Risk to other individuals, targeting based on political beliefs, and presence of children (this was in addition to the separate charge about crime in the presence of children)

The only mention of children is in connection with serious crimes in which a child is a victim. The only mention of politics is when targeting a law enforcement officer "in furtherance of political or social objectives in order to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or to influence or affect the conduct of a government or a unit of government".

It seems they're going to have to say "he was not a well-prepared assassin - he just got lucky to kill his target with his first shot" to keep the claim of risk to others up, and that goes against the "he carefully planned this" narrative.

…it would be pretty easy to hold that part up…he could have planned it well, but someone could have moved at the last second and been injured…or it could have gone through Charlie Kirk and hit someone else.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26090603-robinson-affidavit-of-probable-cause/

Different states have different wording.

AI says (because I don't have time to research)

Aggravated murder is a classification of homicide that includes additional factors that make the crime more severe than a standard murder charge. Specific definitions and penalties for aggravated murder vary significantly among different states and jurisdictions. It is often a capital crime, meaning it can be punishable by the death penalty or life in prison without parole.

I don't think we have that in Texas.

I'm thinking this is probably first degree murder

And often first degree or aggrivated is the charge for premeditated.

Did he fire into a group? I think Kirk was fairly well separated from others - about 8 feet from the nearest person on the stage, and on a stage, so raised from the crowd ( https://www.nbcnews.com/video/shorts/video-shows-the-moment-charlie-kirk-was-shot-247310405708 has video up to the moment before he was shot)

There is likely a standard derived from previous cases which the statute may be missing.

…and it isn’t just about far away they are, it’s about whether or not someone could step into the path of the bullet.

He was aiming at Kirk, but there was no way for Robinson to know that he wouldn't have killed someone else if he missed since he couldn't see who was behind the tent.

see how Robinson can get a fair trial anywhere in Utah.