Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(160,037 posts)
Tue Sep 16, 2025, 08:08 AM 19 hrs ago

No Evidence Of Primary Residence Violation By Fed Governor Lisa Cook, Michigan Official Says

Source: Huff Post/Reuters

Sep 15, 2025, 09:38 PM EDT


Sept 15 (Reuters) — The property tax authority in Ann Arbor, Michigan, said that Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook hasn’t broken rules for tax breaks on a home there that Cook declared her primary residence.

The finding, which came in response to a Reuters request that the city review Cook’s property records, could boost Cook’s defense against efforts by the Trump administration to remove her from the Federal Reserve board.

Ann Arbor has “no reason to believe” that Cook violated property tax rules, City Assessor Jerry Markey told Reuters. Cook has at times lived elsewhere and city records indicate she sought permission from Ann Arbor authorities to rent out the Michigan home on a short-term basis.

Temporary absence from the home or renting it out short-term wouldn’t disqualify her from a tax exemption in Ann Arbor, the tax official said. “Living elsewhere temporarily does not necessarily make an owner ineligible for a principal residence exemption,” said Markey.

Read more: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/lisa-cook-mortgage-michigan-evidence_n_68c8be50e4b00ea6483a1cfd?origin=home-zone-d-unit

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No Evidence Of Primary Residence Violation By Fed Governor Lisa Cook, Michigan Official Says (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 19 hrs ago OP
Now what Trump? You can't let that black woman embarrass your fat ass can you? Bengus81 18 hrs ago #1
Just to be clear... Username1234 18 hrs ago #2
About 30-35% of the population, that's who. OldBaldy1701E 17 hrs ago #6
So Trump is lying again? mdbl 18 hrs ago #3
Trump finds another low IQ flunky, Bill Pulte nwduke 18 hrs ago #4
Sue Trump. Baitball Blogger 18 hrs ago #5
She already did and the Appeals court said she can't be fired. BumRushDaShow 17 hrs ago #7
Sue him for defamation. Baitball Blogger 17 hrs ago #8
A lot of people can sue him for that BumRushDaShow 17 hrs ago #9
Do you really think it would be hard to Baitball Blogger 17 hrs ago #10
The lower courts would (and have) agreed and aren't the problem BumRushDaShow 16 hrs ago #12
A win for Lisa Cook--but she has cruel Trump after her for just being alive! riversedge 17 hrs ago #11
In other words 🖕 you Trump and your and other Republicans firing people to replace them with your ass kissers. cstanleytech 15 hrs ago #13
"Trumped-up charges" has new meaning now CharleyDog 13 hrs ago #14

Username1234

(14 posts)
2. Just to be clear...
Tue Sep 16, 2025, 08:40 AM
18 hrs ago

... the violent GOP lunatics are saying that a Fed governor for whom there's a completely unsubstantiated allegation of fraud by confessed and overt political partisans shouldn't be trusted with the county's finances. However, a con man with a long established reputation, including being recently convicted of over 30 counts of financial fraud, should be trusted to... not commit financial fraud (again)?


What rubes would swallow that?

nwduke

(437 posts)
4. Trump finds another low IQ flunky, Bill Pulte
Tue Sep 16, 2025, 08:58 AM
18 hrs ago

to investigate Lisa Cook only to find out his family own broke the law doing tax fraud as well as 3 of trumps clown show cabinet members doing the same, but surprise surprise, Lisa Cook was exonerated! Ha!

BumRushDaShow

(160,037 posts)
9. A lot of people can sue him for that
Tue Sep 16, 2025, 10:05 AM
17 hrs ago

I expect that is coming... although he would claim all that nonsense was part of his "official duties" and "Daddy Roberts" would go along with that and declare him "immune".

That atrocity that Roberts proclaimed, literally blew the lid off of any way (other than state charges perhaps) of reigning him in.

Baitball Blogger

(50,891 posts)
10. Do you really think it would be hard to
Tue Sep 16, 2025, 10:07 AM
17 hrs ago

Prove malicious defamation when all of his policies are aimed to remove minorities from positions of power?

BumRushDaShow

(160,037 posts)
12. The lower courts would (and have) agreed and aren't the problem
Tue Sep 16, 2025, 10:28 AM
16 hrs ago

The problem is the SCOTUS, as he would be declared "immune" from prosecution. And any of his criminal cabal can violate any law imaginable and get an immediate pardon.

The "test" of this would be with E. Jean Carroll's defamation suits (that like all defamation cases, are "civil" ), that are headed for the SCOTUS.

The system is broken because it is based on "honor" and he has none.

cstanleytech

(27,940 posts)
13. In other words 🖕 you Trump and your and other Republicans firing people to replace them with your ass kissers.
Tue Sep 16, 2025, 11:35 AM
15 hrs ago

CharleyDog

(805 posts)
14. "Trumped-up charges" has new meaning now
Tue Sep 16, 2025, 01:47 PM
13 hrs ago

yet, no one will be *allowed* to say the obvious truth, he, the orange clown is successful in his next totalitarian move. All Democrats are hereby valid targets for the orange clown, blessed by our Supreme Court.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»No Evidence Of Primary Re...