Trump Says Companies Should Stop Reporting Finances Every Quarter
Source: The New York Times
President Trump on Monday proposed to reduce the frequency that public companies report financial information to their investors and the public, suggesting cutting requirements in half by going to two, instead of four, reports a year.
This will save money, and allow managers to focus on properly running their companies, Mr. Trump said in a post on Truth Social. Public companies in the United States have been required to publish quarterly reports for more than 50 years. Many markets in Europe require companies to report only twice a year.
Its not the first time Mr. Trump has raised the idea. During his first term, he suggested moving to semiannual instead of quarterly reports, and the Securities and Exchange Commission explored the issue but never progressed to the point of changing the rules. Mr. Trumps proposal would need to complete a multistep process overseen by securities regulators to become a rule.
The S.E.C. did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/15/business/trump-company-quarterly-reports.html
Oooooof!


IA8IT
(6,258 posts)kerouac2
(1,265 posts)If you don't see how bad something is doing, it isn't doing bad I guess...
Marthe48
(21,785 posts)to regulate public accounting and accountants, because people were getting screwed sideways by crooks who concealed the status of the companies.
My grandfather chose accounting (CPA) as a career in the early 1900s. He made a good living, because it was a new industry and there weren't a lot of good, honest accountants.
In the present era, public accounting isn't something a criminal traitor like rapist felon can live with.
truthisfreedom
(23,468 posts)Grifters.
LetMyPeopleVote
(169,721 posts)This is a big deal. I am not sure if this can be done with a change in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This is a big deal for public companies
I guess that trump hopes this will distract from Epstein
MLWR
(531 posts)from the worse than lousy job he's doing with the economy.
Ponietz
(4,025 posts)MuchBetterThanThis
(75 posts)sakabatou
(45,294 posts)JoseBalow
(8,391 posts)
BaronChocula
(3,314 posts)Not much left to say.
Bernardo de La Paz
(58,315 posts)Wall Street is obsessively focused on 90 days when the best companies are focused on 3 and 10 year plans. Turning around a company is difficult when results come in for several quarters while costs are endured and before benefits show up.
However, the public benefits from more info, not less. Implemented poorly, six month reporting gives an advantage to insiders.
Prairie Gates
(6,252 posts)It's also perfectly reasonable to see that argument as an alibi for systemic short-termism, or at least an overdetermined view of one factor among many. I wouldn't expect any significant reduction in short-termism with a switch to a 6-month reporting schedule.
Short-termism mis a feature of capitalism itself, not an artifact of the regulatory environment.
Bernardo de La Paz
(58,315 posts)mdbl
(7,333 posts)Used to be by the hour.