Trump administration unlawfully directed mass worker terminations, judge rules
Source: Reuters
September 13, 2025 9:02 AM EDT Updated 3 hours ago
Sept 13 (Reuters) - A federal judge ruled on Friday that U.S. President Donald Trump's administration had unlawfully directed the firing of thousands of federal workers, but he did not order their reinstatement, citing recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco stuck by his preliminary conclusion in the case that the U.S. Office of Personnel Management in February unlawfully ordered numerous agencies to fire probationary employees en masse.
Unions, nonprofits and Washington state had sued after Trump's administration moved to fire roughly 25,000 probationary employees, who typically have less than a year of service, though some are longtime workers in new jobs.
Alsup said ordinarily he would "set aside OPM's unlawful directive and unwind its consequences, returning the parties to the ex ante status quo, and as a consequence, probationers to their posts." "But the Supreme Court has made clear enough by way of its emergency docket that it will overrule judicially granted relief respecting hirings and firings within the executive, not just in this case but in others," Alsup wrote.
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-administration-unlawfully-directed-mass-worker-terminations-judge-rules-2025-09-13/
Link to RULING (PDF) - https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/dwpklnkgdvm/09122025alsup.pdf
REFERENCES
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143405674
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143405876
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143411504
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143415828
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143416334
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143417081
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143419250
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143420765
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143424835
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143436076

Irish_Dem
(74,728 posts)BumRushDaShow
(160,061 posts)Then he runs to "Daddy Roberts" to undo it all.
Irish_Dem
(74,728 posts)They are just pretend courts.
Doing a bit of dog and pony.
yellow dahlia
(3,026 posts)But I say that all too often, nowadays.
moniss
(8,052 posts)plainly stated kick in the nuts to the MAGA Supreme Court Justices.
FemDemERA
(583 posts)Seems like some judges lately are saying, It was wrong but since I dont want to be overruled I will let it slide?
Why not make the higher court actually do the work it takes to overrule? If we are lucky, maybe its not a case they take on. If they do and the ruling is overturned, at least you would have done the right thing and tried. And it would be public, the people would know.
Im sure this judge has good intentions and I certainly dont understand all the legalities of these things. I also empathize with not wanting the case to be a rollercoaster of rulings and appeals, but it just makes me weep to see these types of rulings.
Am I completely off in my understanding? Please someone with legal knowledge explain to me (in simple terms) these seemingly halfhearted rulings and why it should not make me feel disheartened.