Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(107,016 posts)
Sat Sep 13, 2025, 06:33 AM Saturday

Sen. Pete Ricketts: Here's how we're returning to norms, overcoming Democrats' obstruction

Source: Omaha World Herald

By Pete Ricketts 42 mins ago

Nebraskans know that government should be effective and efficient. But in Washington, the gears are stuck. The Democrats are blockading the government. They are refusing to confirm nominees in a timely manner. Democrats are obstructing nominations just to score political points. They are risking Nebraskans’ safety. Without leadership, agencies underperform. Nebraskans won’t get the service they deserve. I’m fighting to make government work.

Historically, Democrats and Republicans have always cooperated to swiftly confirm a president’s nominees. Occasionally, high-profile or controversial nominees don’t make it through the expedited process. But the Senate has a tradition of quickly advancing most nominees.

Ninety percent of President Obama’s nominees were confirmed by voice vote or unanimous consent. For President Biden, it was 57%. President Trump is the first president in history not to have a single nominee confirmed in this way.

During the Biden administration, Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said that it’s important to quickly confirm nominees. He said that regardless of the party in the White House, both sides have long agreed that a president deserves to have his or her administration in place, quickly. But Schumer’s Senate Minority doesn’t believe that anymore.

Read more: http://archive.today/M8wUc



Original PAY link: https://omaha.com/opinion/column/article_02aea5a9-d62e-4447-8f01-4e06b02104d6.html
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sen. Pete Ricketts: Here's how we're returning to norms, overcoming Democrats' obstruction (Original Post) Omaha Steve Saturday OP
You're right, Pete - we don't believe that anymore. stopdiggin Saturday #1
Historically, presidential nominees have at least been ... 3catwoman3 Saturday #2
Hmmm lonely bird Saturday #3
DJT was the 1st POTUS to call for the jailing of his political opponents. So, yeah we got a problem here, Pete. nt Exp Saturday #4
I believe the First President to jail an opponent was John Adams, the opponent was US Rep (Vermont 1st) Matthew Lyon 24601 Sunday #9
One question, Democrats are you 'learning' from this. republianmushroom Saturday #5
In other words, Democrats must bow to the tyrant, or else dalton99a Saturday #6
Or blocking Supreme Court nominees.... Quanto Magnus Saturday #7
Reap what you sow Username1234 Sunday #8

stopdiggin

(14,402 posts)
1. You're right, Pete - we don't believe that anymore.
Sat Sep 13, 2025, 06:49 AM
Saturday

And the reason for that is as transparent as the egregious selections of RFKjr, Hegseth, Noem, Patel, Gabbard, Bondi - and let us not forget the destructive swath of the 'non-appointment' Musk. In short we have run headlong into a chief executive - whose ambition and agenda is destruction. No legislative branch in its right mind will be 'on board' with such an agenda. And thus a 'Senate minority' that has understandably 'chary' of Mr. Trump's (suspect and peculiar) nominees.

3catwoman3

(27,683 posts)
2. Historically, presidential nominees have at least been ...
Sat Sep 13, 2025, 08:57 AM
Saturday

…marginally qualified for the posts for which they’ve been tapped.

Exp

(570 posts)
4. DJT was the 1st POTUS to call for the jailing of his political opponents. So, yeah we got a problem here, Pete. nt
Sat Sep 13, 2025, 11:49 AM
Saturday

24601

(4,107 posts)
9. I believe the First President to jail an opponent was John Adams, the opponent was US Rep (Vermont 1st) Matthew Lyon
Sun Sep 14, 2025, 11:49 AM
Sunday

"Lyon also has the distinction of being the only person to be elected to Congress while in jail. On October 10, 1798, he was found guilty of violating the Alien and Sedition Acts, which prohibited malicious writing about the American government as a whole, or of the houses of Congress, or of the president. During the Quasi War with France, Lyon was the first person to be put to trial for violating the acts after he published editorials criticizing Federalist President John Adams."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Lyon

Lyon subsequently represented Kentucky's 1st district from 1803 - 1811

republianmushroom

(21,371 posts)
5. One question, Democrats are you 'learning' from this.
Sat Sep 13, 2025, 12:06 PM
Saturday

You sure as hell should be for your next turn at running the govt. Take off the gloves and the next time you reach across the isle, do it with a resounding slap. Old guard, up yours, times for changed.

Quanto Magnus

(1,255 posts)
7. Or blocking Supreme Court nominees....
Sat Sep 13, 2025, 01:07 PM
Saturday

Seriously, F the Republicans and nominations. They've operated in bad for YEARS!

Username1234

(15 posts)
8. Reap what you sow
Sun Sep 14, 2025, 11:27 AM
Sunday

"Ninety percent of President Obama’s nominees were confirmed by voice vote or unanimous consent. For President Biden, it was 57%."

From this data point, it says the GOP started the problem under Biden. Reap what you sow, Petey boy.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sen. Pete Ricketts: Here'...