Senior Democrat says Pentagon didn't present conclusive evidence alleged drug smugglers killed in strike were gang membe
Source: CNN
Defense Department officials briefing congressional staff on Tuesday about last weeks US military strike on a boat in the Caribbean did not present conclusive evidence that the targets of the attack were members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, according to the senior Democratic member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and three people familiar with the briefing.
They have offered no positive identification that the boat was Venezuelan, nor that its crew were members of Tren de Aragua or any other cartel, Sen. Jack Reed, the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said on Tuesday after his staff were briefed by DoD.
The briefers also acknowledged that they could not determine exactly where the targets were headed, two of the sources said. Whereas Trump has said they were en route to the US, Secretary of State Marco Rubio initially said, these particular drugs were probably headed to Trinidad or some other country in the Caribbean, at which point they just contribute to the instability these countries are facing.
Another of the sources said the briefers disclosed that the boat turned around at one point after appearing to spot a military aircraft above that had been watching them. The boat turning around, reported earlier by the New York Times, raises more questions about whether it posed an immediate threat to the US that necessitated military action......
Pressed repeatedly on the legal justification for the strike, the briefers invoked the presidents authority under Article II of the Constitution to use military force when it is in the national interest, the sources said. The briefers said that lawyers had signed off on the attack but would not disclose which lawyers or what their reasoning was, the sources added.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/11/politics/senior-democrat-pentagon-strike-gang-members-evidence
In briefing to the hill, DoD did not present conclusive evidence that the targets of last weekâs attack were members of Tren de Aragua, top Armed Services Dem and sources say. Briefers also acknowledged the boat turned around before being struck. www.cnn.com/2025/09/11/p...
— Natasha Bertrand (@natashabertrand.bsky.social) 2025-09-11T15:01:19.821Z

JustAnotherGen
(37,036 posts)This is right up this cabal's alley. They will wag the dog to make Epstein go away.
RockRaven
(17,991 posts)And no amount of "we found some lawyer to say it was legal" will change that.
What also won't change is that there is no chance of justice happening.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,194 posts)followed Trump's illegal order.
So much for all those people who told me the military would refuse to follow illegal orders.
Bernardo de La Paz
(58,319 posts)Bayard
(26,974 posts)No facts allowed.
Response to LetMyPeopleVote (Original post)
Bayard This message was self-deleted by its author.
Farmer-Rick
(12,072 posts)To distract from his BFF Epstein.
And people have to be murdered illegally by the US Navy to make that happen.
LetMyPeopleVote
(169,744 posts)The incident has frustrated lawmakers from both parties who have questioned why the administration has not publicly disclosed evidence to back up its claims.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/09/10/trump-drug-boat-strike-congress/
On Wednesday, more than 20 Democrats petitioned President Donald Trump to clarify a host of facts about the operation, including the military assets involved and how the administration confirmed the targets were part of a drug network. Their outreach followed a closed-door briefing by the Pentagon to bipartisan staff from the principal national security committees, a meeting that two people familiar with the matter characterized as vague and unsatisfying......
In announcing the strike on Sept. 2, Trump said the vessels crew had been positively identified as members of Tren de Aragua, a criminal group his administration has sought to connect to Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and violent crime in the U.S. He claimed later that the U.S. government has tapes of the suspects speaking, but to date the administration has not released evidence verifying who and what was aboard the boat blown up by U.S. forces.
Kaine and other Democrats have cast doubt on the administrations statements and questioned why the boat wasnt stopped by a U.S. vessel, consistent with long-standing efforts to interdict suspected drug smugglers......
The Pentagon sent no lawyers to the Hill for Tuesdays briefing, which these people interpreted as a deliberate effort to avoid addressing the strikes legality. During the meeting, defense officials cited the presidents broad authority under Article II of the Constitution to conduct foreign policy deemed in the national interest and said lawyers within the administration had deemed the attack legal, the people familiar with the matter said, noting that the Pentagons representatives declined to identify the lawyers or provide further documentation.
I wonder if no lawyers came because the trump Defense Department could not find any lawyers who would/could defend this attack
twodogsbarking
(15,723 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(169,744 posts)A week after the Trump administration killed suspected drug dealers in international waters, Democrats have some pointed questions. GOP senators do not.
MURDER AT SEA.
— drgk1 (@drgk1.bsky.social) 2025-09-11T19:52:35.222Z
As Democrats press White House on deadly boat strike, Republicans sit on their hands!
A week after the Trump administration killed suspected drug dealers in international waters, Democrats have some pointed questions. GOP senators do not. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/democrats-press-white-house-deadly-boat-strike-republicans-sit-hands-rcna230630
As The Washington Post reported, quite a few Senate Democrats have some questions in need of answers. From the article:
On Wednesday, more than 20 Democrats petitioned President Donald Trump to clarify a host of facts about the operation, including the military assets involved and how the administration confirmed the targets were part of a drug network. Their outreach followed a closed-door briefing by the Pentagon to bipartisan staff from the principal national security committees, a meeting that two people familiar with the matter characterized as vague and unsatisfying.
......n all, 25 Democratic senators asked the president 10 straightforward questions, including:
Who were the individuals targeted in the strike, and what intelligence does the Administration have regarding their identities, any imminent threat they did or did not pose, what crimes they were accused or suspected of, and what alleged affiliations they had with a narcotrafficking criminal organization?
How were the individuals targeted in the strike positively identified as lawful targets for lethal military force? What legal review was conducted for assessing whether the use of lethal force in this context and against these particular criminal suspects was lawful under both domestic and international law?
What assessment, if any, was conducted regarding whether the use of lethal force in this context could undermine intelligence-gathering opportunities that would come from capturing potential traffickers alive?
Zero Republicans signed on to the letter.