Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(160,228 posts) Tue Sep 9, 2025, 09:25 AM Sep 9

'Frankly outrageous': Dem slams court for using 'shadow docket' to hand Trump another win

Source: Raw Story

September 8, 2025 11:23PM ET

Democratic strategist Neera Tanden slammed the Supreme Court's decision on Monday to allow immigration officials to use race to decide who to target for immigration actions.

Neera Tanden, CEO of the Center for American Progress, joined CNN's "NewsNight with Abby Phillip" on Monday to discuss the Supreme Court's ruling.

Tanden argued that it the court should give a "rationalization" of its decision because of the magnitude of the case.

"The fact that they are providing these decisions without any explanation, while Justice Amy Coney Barrett has time to write a memoir but not a decision, on an issue that affects all of our rights, is frankly outrageous," Tanden said.

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/neera-tanden/

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Frankly outrageous': Dem slams court for using 'shadow docket' to hand Trump another win (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Sep 9 OP

Because even the law clerks for the six Justices can't come up with credible no_hypocrisy Sep 9 #1

Is the shady docket, er, shadow docket the Baitball Blogger Sep 9 #2

The simple explanation is that without profiling, they'll never get anywhere near their deportation goals William Seger Sep 9 #3

I guess that means that some SCOTUS justices are willing to tear up the Constitution FakeNoose Sep 9 #5

State Sponsored Pogroms 2na fisherman Sep 9 #4

no_hypocrisy

(53,082 posts)

1. Because even the law clerks for the six Justices can't come up with credible

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Sep 9, 2025, 09:29 AM

Sep 9

and cogent rationales, despite their resumes of Law Review from Harvard, Yale Law Schools.

My Question: Why even have the parties submit legal briefs that aren't going to be used for the Shadow Docket?

Baitball Blogger

(50,917 posts)

2. Is the shady docket, er, shadow docket the

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Sep 9, 2025, 09:54 AM

Sep 9

Same as the emergency docket?

William Seger

(11,819 posts)

3. The simple explanation is that without profiling, they'll never get anywhere near their deportation goals

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Sep 9, 2025, 09:56 AM

Sep 9

... and SOME justices wouldn't want THAT to happen!

FakeNoose

(38,654 posts)

5. I guess that means that some SCOTUS justices are willing to tear up the Constitution

Reply to William Seger (Reply #3)

Tue Sep 9, 2025, 12:11 PM

Sep 9

... and the Bill of Rights in order to help ICE meet their phony self-imposed deportation goals?

2na fisherman

(91 posts)

4. State Sponsored Pogroms

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Tue Sep 9, 2025, 11:27 AM

Sep 9

So what's next, forcing immigrants to wear ethnic identifying patches on their clothes? The Supreme Court is dooming this country to repeat the mistakes of the past. Will they be okay with forcing all Jews to wear the Star of David symbol on their clothes? Stephen Miller must already have some racist patch designs to force Mexican immigrants to wear.

Reply to this discussion