Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(160,228 posts)
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 09:05 AM Sep 4

Bill To Let Texans Sue Out-of-state Abortion Pill Providers Heads To Governor

Source: Huff Post/AP

Sep 3, 2025, 09:59 PM EDT


AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A measure that would allow Texas residents to sue out-of-state abortion pill providers advanced to the desk of Gov. Greg Abbott Wednesday, setting the state up to be the first to try to crack down on the most common abortion method.

Supporters say it’s a key tool to enforce the state’s abortion ban, protecting women and fetuses.

Opponents see it not only as another way to rein in abortion but as an effort to intimidate abortion providers outside Texas who are complying with the laws in their states — and to encourage a form of vigilantism.

If the measure becomes law, it’s nearly certain to spark legal challenges from abortion rights supporters.

Read more: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/abortion-texas-out-of-state_n_68b8e228e4b041ed82bd20bb

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bill To Let Texans Sue Out-of-state Abortion Pill Providers Heads To Governor (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Sep 4 OP
What bullshit.... Lovie777 Sep 4 #1
I think they JustAnotherGen Sep 4 #3
FYI - there are a lot of us Texans that feel the same way. walkingman Sep 4 #4
Rest assured JustAnotherGen Sep 4 #5
I know. I have a Liberal Texan friend of decades. electric_blue68 Sep 4 #11
They can go fuck themselves JustAnotherGen Sep 4 #2
This isn't going to be solved bucolic_frolic Sep 4 #6
That would be awesome! LeftInTX Sep 5 #28
Idle researchers have idle time bucolic_frolic Sep 5 #30
I thought you had to have legal "standing" to bring a lawsuit. Diamond_Dog Sep 4 #7
Good point. I am not a lawyer but I have thought about this. Redleg Sep 4 #10
What this says is..NO WOMAN IS SAFE IN TEXAS. ProudMNDemocrat Sep 4 #8
Dumb as rocks - Nigrum Cattus Sep 4 #9
In GOP doublespeak, "protecting" means "further endangering"... ananda Sep 4 #12
No Way This SHOULD Stick. GB_RN Sep 4 #13
so i guess a state like california can pass a law moonshinegnomie Sep 4 #14
NY has such laws dubbed "Shield" laws BumRushDaShow Sep 4 #15
id go much further moonshinegnomie Sep 4 #17
I think the reality of doing that is BumRushDaShow Sep 4 #18
except it wouldnt be the state actually doing it moonshinegnomie Sep 4 #22
TX has that "Heartbeat" ( "bounty" ) law for individuals to sue providers in other states BumRushDaShow Sep 4 #23
once again those were texas courts moonshinegnomie Sep 4 #25
I think as analogous situation BumRushDaShow Sep 5 #26
The judge who threw out the case is a Democrat. LeftInTX Sep 5 #29
"Papers please" CTyankee Sep 4 #16
Look out Texas Mail persons. You;re bluestarone Sep 4 #19
whatever happened to STATES RIGHTS Skittles Sep 4 #20
Meanwhile GOP blessed JFK Jr. under the tRump administration have basically killed children with measles. ffr Sep 4 #21
You mean RFK Jr. Rhiannon12866 Sep 5 #27
It also allows lawsuits against the web services used to order the pills NickB79 Sep 4 #24

JustAnotherGen

(37,067 posts)
3. I think they
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 09:17 AM
Sep 4

don't realize how much some of us in the Northeast hate their guts and will do anything to flip the bird at them.

walkingman

(9,843 posts)
4. FYI - there are a lot of us Texans that feel the same way.
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 09:24 AM
Sep 4

It is like living in a mental ward in the summer with the heat on. The Texas State government is sick.

electric_blue68

(23,875 posts)
11. I know. I have a Liberal Texan friend of decades.
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 10:31 AM
Sep 4

She told us on FB when Biden won that she'd dance outside but she might get shot.

JustAnotherGen

(37,067 posts)
2. They can go fuck themselves
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 09:17 AM
Sep 4

We will do whatever the hell we want in NJ. Governor Hot Wheels can fuck all the way off.

Diamond_Dog

(38,490 posts)
7. I thought you had to have legal "standing" to bring a lawsuit.
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 09:30 AM
Sep 4

What suffering has any average Texas resident endured besides having their extremist misogynistic beliefs challenged? A court should throw this out!

Redleg

(6,616 posts)
10. Good point. I am not a lawyer but I have thought about this.
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 10:27 AM
Sep 4

To me it seems akin to Texas offering a bounty to people who rat out a woman who might have had an abortion.

ProudMNDemocrat

(20,246 posts)
8. What this says is..NO WOMAN IS SAFE IN TEXAS.
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 09:36 AM
Sep 4

Are lawmakers in Texas also going to BAN Birth Control methods as well? "We can't have them Texas women preventing pregnancy, now can we?"

Pregnancies can and do go wrong. They would rather women die from a pregnancy gone wrong rather than get care when they do.

Nigrum Cattus

(1,005 posts)
9. Dumb as rocks -
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 10:15 AM
Sep 4

This will only drive the supply of pills underground.
They will be smuggled in from Canada & Mexico.
The religious extremists are truly a negative influence
on society.

GB_RN

(3,439 posts)
13. No Way This SHOULD Stick.
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 11:42 AM
Sep 4

No state can interfere with another in this manner. But I don’t trust the Corrupt 6 to actually follow the Constitution anymore.

moonshinegnomie

(3,642 posts)
14. so i guess a state like california can pass a law
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 11:48 AM
Sep 4

protecting abortion pill providors in the state from lawsuits in the same way. make it so suing a california resident for providing an abortion pill means a claifornia resident can sue the person suing damages. same idea....

BumRushDaShow

(160,228 posts)
15. NY has such laws dubbed "Shield" laws
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 12:26 PM
Sep 4

Last edited Thu Sep 4, 2025, 01:02 PM - Edit history (1)

Shield Law protections

NY went through this nonsense with TX the past year -

NY court blocks Texas from punishing abortion telehealth doctor, testing state shield law (Mar. 2025)

Ulster County clerk rejects Texas’ second attempt to file abortion judgment (Jul. 2025)

State Shield Laws: Protections for Abortion and Gender-Affirming Care Providers (has a list of states with this protection and to what degree)

22 states + D.C. have laws against out-of-state prosecutions
16 states + D.C. have laws against civil liability

moonshinegnomie

(3,642 posts)
17. id go much further
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 02:52 PM
Sep 4

NY law says they wont co-operate with othe states on ant abortion laws. Id allow people in NY or other states to sue people in texas.

IE doctor smith in texas perscribes an abortion pill to a texas woman whchi then gets the pill from pharmacy x

joe texas decides to sue both the doctor and the pharmacy under the new texas law.

my idea would allow any resident of NY to file a lawsuit in NY against joe texas. same idea as the texas law.



BumRushDaShow

(160,228 posts)
18. I think the reality of doing that is
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 03:16 PM
Sep 4

(with the slow courts), based on what Paxton did during the 2020 election suing other states because he didn't like how they ran their elections - the courts (including the SCOTUS) threw the suits out.

In essence, a state doesn't have that kind of authority over how another state handles its affairs.

Supreme Court rejects Republican attack on Biden victory


By NOMAAN MERCHANT, ALANNA DURKIN RICHER and MARK SHERMAN
Published 9:13 AM EDT, December 12, 2020

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has rejected a lawsuit backed by President Donald Trump to overturn Joe Biden’s election victory, ending a desperate attempt to get legal issues rejected by state and federal judges before the nation’s highest court and subvert the will of voters.

(snip)

Friday’s order marked the second time this week that the court had rebuffed Republican requests that it get involved in the 2020 election outcome and reject the voters’ choice, as expressed in an election regarded by both Republican and Democratic officials as free and fair. The justices turned away an appeal from Pennsylvania Republicans on Tuesday. On Monday, the Electoral College meets to formally elect Biden as the next president.

Trump had called the lawsuit filed by Texas against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin “the big one” that would end with the Supreme Court undoing Biden’s substantial Electoral College majority and allowing Trump to serve another four years in the White House.

In a brief order, the court said Texas does not have the legal right to sue those states because it “has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.”


(snip)


Whenever you DO see states "cooperate", they have MOUs (Memorandums of Understanding) and other agreements (like for extradition) in place to authorize it.

I do get what you are saying - "What's good for the goose is good for the gander".

moonshinegnomie

(3,642 posts)
22. except it wouldnt be the state actually doing it
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 04:12 PM
Sep 4

all it would be is the state saying person x has standing to sue in a NY court for damages. no different than the texas law giving a texas resident standing to sue.

BumRushDaShow

(160,228 posts)
23. TX has that "Heartbeat" ( "bounty" ) law for individuals to sue providers in other states
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 04:31 PM
Sep 4

and some states sued TX in advance for the law being unconstitutional, but those suits were thrown out, apparently because "no one had used the law yet" or some such wording.

However there was one suit that was filed by someone who did try to use it against a TX doctor and it was thrown out because they could not show it harmed them (in this case, the TX courts threw it out) -

Texas Court Throws Out Case Against Doctor Who Violated Abortion Ban

In any case, the shield laws supposedly preclude "liability" suits from out of state plaintiffs for specific reproductive rights issues, along with gender-affirming care (at least some of the state laws). I can't see how a state can dictate who has standing in another state.

moonshinegnomie

(3,642 posts)
25. once again those were texas courts
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 10:09 PM
Sep 4

in my example it would be a case filed in NY.. against a texas defendent. no different then a person in texas filing a texas lawsuit against a ny doctor.

BumRushDaShow

(160,228 posts)
26. I think as analogous situation
Fri Sep 5, 2025, 03:51 AM
Sep 5

some Sandy Hook families sued Alex Jones in a CT court, despite Jones residing in TX (others sued him directly in a TX court) -

Connecticut Supreme Court declines to hear Alex Jones’ appeal of $1B Sandy Hook verdict

That was obviously a civil suit though.

I think most lawyers want to keep their licenses by avoiding the idiocy that TX loons like Paxton, participates in continually.

LeftInTX

(33,983 posts)
29. The judge who threw out the case is a Democrat.
Fri Sep 5, 2025, 09:30 AM
Sep 5

It's hit or miss. I think the plaintiff can file in any state court, but they filed in San Antonio where currently every judge is a Democrat.

If they would have filed in any of the five surrounding suburban counties the judge probably would not have tossed the case. I don't know the law particular , but Dr Braid practiced in SA. I swear you can file in any state court.

CTyankee

(67,069 posts)
16. "Papers please"
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 12:31 PM
Sep 4

border guards stopping cars with young women in them and an anti-choice state license plate...

bluestarone

(20,292 posts)
19. Look out Texas Mail persons. You;re
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 03:16 PM
Sep 4

Next in line to get prison time!! (If these monsters get their way)

ffr

(23,243 posts)
21. Meanwhile GOP blessed JFK Jr. under the tRump administration have basically killed children with measles.
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 03:49 PM
Sep 4
As Measles Exploded, Officials in Texas Looked to CDC Scientists. Under Trump, No One Answered.
https://kffhealthnews.org/news/article/texas-measles-outbreak-cdc-vaccines-rfk-trump/

Texas announces second death in measles outbreak
https://www.dshs.texas.gov/news-alerts/texas-announces-second-death-measles-outbreak
The school-aged child who tested positive for measles was hospitalized in Lubbock and passed away on Thursday from what the child’s doctors described as measles pulmonary failure. The child was not vaccinated and had no reported underlying conditions.

NickB79

(20,104 posts)
24. It also allows lawsuits against the web services used to order the pills
Thu Sep 4, 2025, 06:25 PM
Sep 4

Let's see these dumb fucks try to sue Google.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Bill To Let Texans Sue Ou...