Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(159,319 posts)
Wed Sep 3, 2025, 04:02 AM Wednesday

Jeffries warns Republicans: Democrats will oppose GOP spending bill

Source: The Hill

09/02/25 4:02 PM ET


House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) on Tuesday warned GOP leaders that House Democrats will oppose any government spending bill negotiated by only Republicans.

Behind Jeffries, House Democrats had voted almost unanimously in March against the Republicans’ 2025 spending extension, which had been crafted without input from Democratic appropriators. As Congress inches closer to a Sept. 30 deadline for 2026 spending, Jeffries said his caucus is ready to hold the line again if they’re cut out of the talks.

“The ball is in the court of the Trump administration and Republicans, because if they continue to proceed down the lane of trying to jam a partisan bill down the throats of the American people without working with Democrats in the House or the Senate, our position will be the same as it was in March,” he told reporters in the Capitol on the first day. “We will not support a partisan spending bill put forward by Republicans that hurts everyday Americans.”

Jeffries said he spoke with Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) last week on the spending issue, which he characterized as “an opening conversation … about the importance of trying to find common ground where possible.” “But in that conversation,” he quickly added, “I also made clear we’re not going to support partisan funding legislation. Period. Full stop.”

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5482296-bipartisan-spending-bill-threat/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jeffries warns Republicans: Democrats will oppose GOP spending bill (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Wednesday OP
Can Democrats in the Senate filibuster the Budget? no_hypocrisy Wednesday #1
YES BumRushDaShow Wednesday #3
The point he made earlier in the year remains valid. During a government shutdown, POTUS alone will determine which 24601 Wednesday #4
As a retired fed BumRushDaShow Wednesday #5
In other words, it's identical to the present situation. PSPS Wednesday #7
They can - but it's potentially dangerous FBaggins Wednesday #8
Hope so. Scrivener7 Wednesday #2
I will believe it when I see it. quakerboy Wednesday #6

24601

(4,101 posts)
4. The point he made earlier in the year remains valid. During a government shutdown, POTUS alone will determine which
Wed Sep 3, 2025, 09:23 AM
Wednesday

Executive Branch functions & organizations continue to operate as Emergency Essential.

Any bets on who works & who stays home?

BumRushDaShow

(159,319 posts)
5. As a retired fed
Wed Sep 3, 2025, 10:18 AM
Wednesday

during my career, I experienced multiple furloughs due to a lapse in funding and they usually "exempt" those involved in "health and safety" functions (and even in that case, not "all", but a handful were kept working and the rest were furloughed). It also meant that all government contracts were supposed to be issued a STOP WORK order. Those contractors do NOT get paid when funding resumes (with some exceptions where the Prime contractor might eat that cost and pay their staff).

During those furloughs when we had (finally) had our own laptops, we were told NOT to even open the lids and turn them on during that time, otherwise we would be violating the law that 45 is violating EVERY SINGLE DAY - the "Antideficiency Act".

The media circus during these furloughs often revolved around standing in front one of the national park entrances and taking pics of a sign at a gate saying "CLOSED" while claiming people were whining about that. But in this day and age, the national parks have been completely chain-sawed of staff by the chainsaw monkey, so they have already been operating in near-furlough mode.

We would be told to "monitor the media" and had call trees set up for when we were "good to go".

Over the years, the threats increased regarding whether to give employees who were furloughed, "back pay", until one of the last furloughs finally resulted in a law being passed requiring back pay (they had previously rolled the back pay into the final funding bill before then after much shaming).

PSPS

(14,860 posts)
7. In other words, it's identical to the present situation.
Wed Sep 3, 2025, 02:47 PM
Wednesday

The government is already effectively shut down now so "making it official" is merely semantics.

FBaggins

(28,409 posts)
8. They can - but it's potentially dangerous
Wed Sep 3, 2025, 09:03 PM
Wednesday

It's one thing to have republicans shut down the government... or even for democrats to allow it to be shut down by just not supporting a bill...

... but it's another thing to cause the shutdown by filibustering. It makes it hard to point fingers at the other side

It all depends on how offensive the republican bill is. If they're just proposing a "clean" CR that extends things 'till their next reconciliation window... it will be tough for Schumer to block. But they're likely to try for much more.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jeffries warns Republican...