Trump Administration Plans to Take Control of Washington Union Station
Source: US News and World Report/Reuters
Aug. 27, 2025, at 6:54 a.m.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Transportation Department said on Wednesday it planned to reclaim management of Washington Union Station, one of the country's biggest rail hubs, after Trump administration officials raised safety concerns.
In March, the White House forced the CEO of U.S. passenger railroad company Amtrak, Stephen Gardner, to step down following orders by President Donald Trump. The plan to reclaim Union Station follows Trump's move this month to deploy hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington after he took control of the local police department over the objections of local leaders.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in a statement the department was renegotiating a cooperative agreement with the non-profit Union Station Redevelopment Corporation, which controls the station, and Amtrak. In September, formal action confirming the USDOT's renewed control of Union Station is expected, he added. National Guard troops have guarded sites including Union Station and Vice President JD Vance visited soldiers at the station last week.
Amtrak is set to unveil on Wednesday new high-speed Acela trains on the busy Northeast Corridor, linking Boston to Washington, the busiest U.S. rail corridor with 800,000 daily trips in a region representing 20% of the U.S. economy.
Read more: https://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2025-08-27/trump-administration-plans-to-take-control-of-washington-union-station

(this will even further drive tourists away and I would think that Congress would have the authority versus this idiotic "Unitary Executive" nonsense)

Lonestarblue
(12,924 posts)Will airlines be next? Trump is bent on destroying anything that actually functions.
jgmiller
(641 posts)This is just more silly theater, from everything I've read DC Union Station is beautiful and Amtrak already kind of reports to Duffy so having Duffy take it over is basically meaningless but the press will report it like it's some amazing thing.
BumRushDaShow
(160,228 posts)if you use it as an excuse to bring in more and more troops to"patrol" the station to intimidate the tourists.
There are bus tours that stop there and let people go in and around the station. The last time I was down there, the double-decker one we were on did that (although I had been in there many times before but it was my niece's first time).
jgmiller
(641 posts)BumRushDaShow
(160,228 posts)They always reveal their guilt by "projecting" who is doing "overreach" and imposing the ""big hand of government" onto institutions (that they accused Biden of wielding less than a year ago).
Torchlight
(5,695 posts)Trump, Mussolini, or imaginary? Hard to tell these days.
FakeNoose
(38,654 posts)Remember this?
This is the hotel at Union Station in Washington DC, and Trump never owned it. He had a 99 year lease and his company managed the hotel until he gave it up at few years ago. During his first term this hotel became notorious as a way for international (mostly Arab) businesses to "book rooms" for exorbitant amounts of money and basically pay bribes to Chump while he was in the White House.
The shining headline "Pay Trump Bribes Here" in the photo, was an actual light shining on the building from across the street, and it was done by protesters as a way to illustrate the ease with which Chump was abusing the system. I remember another photo which showed the light saying "Pay Trump Emoluments Here" which is basically the same thing.
This is NOT the RAILWAY, it's the HOTEL that's adjacent to the railway. Chump never managed or had anything to do with the railway. This is an all-new power-grab by Chump and he's hoping none of us will notice.
BumRushDaShow
(160,228 posts)When I was last down there in 2018 (which was during his first term), I was with my sis, BIL, and niece and we got on one of those "big bus" tours (the double-decker ones) and it drove by there and I covered my eyes and started gurgling "Ewwww".
I think that is within eye-sight of the White House (on Pennsylvania Avenue), and IIRC, you could see the WH straight down the street from there about 1/2 a mile.
FakeNoose
(38,654 posts)There weren't many customers in the place and it looked kind of shabby. Chump wasn't anywhere near it at that point. I'm actually not sure when he took it over, but it was a meaningless venture until he became president.
BumRushDaShow
(160,228 posts)and it hosted a number of events with foreign heads of state that prompted a pile of accusations, investigations, and legal cases regarding violations of the "Emoluments Clause", that slogged through that first term until the SCOTUS tossed the cases when he lost the 2020 election.
By MARK SHERMAN
Published 1:08 PM EST, January 25, 2021
WASHINGTON (AP) The Supreme Court on Monday brought an end to lawsuits over whether Donald Trump illegally profited off his presidency, saying the cases are moot now that Trump is no longer in office.
The high courts action was the first in an expected steady stream of orders and rulings on pending lawsuits involving Trump now that his presidency has ended. Some orders may result in dismissals of cases since Trump is no longer president. In other cases, proceedings that had been delayed because Trump was in the White House could resume and their pace even quicken.
The justices threw out Trumps challenge to lower court rulings that had allowed lawsuits to go forward alleging that he violated the Constitutions emoluments clause by accepting payments from foreign and domestic officials who stay at the Trump International Hotel and patronize other businesses owned by the former president and his family.
The high court also ordered the lower court rulings thrown out as well and directed appeals courts in New York and Richmond, Virginia, to dismiss the suits as moot now that Trump is no longer in office. The outcome leaves no appellate court opinions on the books in an area of the law that has been rarely explored in U.S. history.
(snip)
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-ends-trump-lawsuits-df42ef0eec5fa57edf3e294234051d88

(now it's infinitely worse in terms of violations)
FakeNoose
(38,654 posts)One of my job requirements was to occasionally travel for my company and represent them at trade shows. I'm sure that was why I was in downtown Washington DC on a regular weekday, but I can't remember the exact year.
BumRushDaShow
(160,228 posts)about 2 weeks into his first term and watched (and cried) with a bunch of my co-workers when my Philly work building took down the Obama portrait in the lobby on Inauguration Day 2017, but thankfully was not there when 45's went up.
The building is historic and GSA apparently leases it out and did so to 45 in 2012, and he sold the hotel's stake in the lease a couple years after Biden was elected.
FakeNoose
(38,654 posts)

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(128,722 posts)Don't want anyone getting hurt.
OrwellwasRight
(5,247 posts)More atomization because fewer collective solutions. Your fellow citizens are in the same boat as you if you all ride the same trains every day. They are your enemies if you are all in cars competing for space on the streets. This is evil.
BumRushDaShow
(160,228 posts)although Union Station is just one stop on one of the various Metro lines (Red Line) that run across the city and D.C. metro area. A significant number of commuters use the Metro to commute around the area in any case. The rest of Union Station's function is as an Amtrak station.
ETA -
OrwellwasRight
(5,247 posts)Like the Bolt bus. If people decide they would rather get in their car than be scrutinized or perhaps even searched by armed yahoos every time they enter or exit Union Station, it is a big deal. It is thousands of people a day.
BumRushDaShow
(160,228 posts)me and my coworkers would get on Amtrak and get off at Union Station and hop the Red Line to get to our work building(s), since there were several. But a few years later, we started getting off Amtrak at New Carrollton, MD and hopped the Orange Line, then switched to the Red Line at Metro Plaza, avoiding dealing with Union Station to get to the Red Line.
After that, I just started driving... to the point where my car knew the route by heart. It still took about 2.5 - 3 hours to/from Philly but I knew what times to go/leave to avoid the worst of the Beltway, where one drop of rain slows the thing down to a near stand still. But while down there, I did hop Metrobus shuttles to Silver Spring.
OrwellwasRight
(5,247 posts)As I soon as I moved to DC, I sold my car and went everywhere by metro, bus, bike and foot. And I never looked back. Commuting by car now makes me nervous. I try to live within a five mile radius of where I work. My last four jobs have been a less than 2 mile radius. I love it.
BumRushDaShow
(160,228 posts)either for "in person" meetings, training, conferences, etc. But I did know a few who were commuting down there daily - but they used Amtrak. Some of them couldn't move down there because they usually had a kid trying to finish up high school, so moving wasn't in the cards... but some actually rented an apartment down there and came home for weekends.
This was all before I retired and telework makes it much easier for remote workers (I guess before the DOGEshit guys came in and blew that away ).
riversedge
(77,794 posts)🚨MAJOR BREAKING: Donald Trump has assumed full federal control of Washington DC's Union Station and has taken it over from Amtrak.
Trump isnt fixing anything - hes consolidating POWER in the nations capital, one takeover at a time.
Link to tweet