Abrego Garcia's attorneys ask to reopen his immigration case to seek asylum
Source: ABC
Attorneys for wrongly deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia have filed an emergency motion to reopen his immigration case to seek asylum, according to a court filing Tuesday.
Abrego Garcia, who was rearrested Monday in Maryland after he was released Friday from criminal custody in Tennessee, is currently being held in a detention center in Virginia, where the federal government is temporarily blocked from deporting him pending further proceedings in a habeas case.
"At 5pm yesterday, Petitioner filed a motion to reopen before an immigration judge to seek asylum in the United States," his attorneys said in a proposed scheduling order filed on Tuesday. "Petitioner proposes that the parties allow the immigration judge to resolve that motion within two weeks from today."
According to the emergency motion to reopen the case, his attorneys argue that because Abrego Garcia was deported and then brought back to the U.S., he is now eligible to apply for asylum within one year of his last entry into the U.S.
The motion asks the immigration court in Baltimore to "immediately" order a stay of removal to afford Abrego Garcia "an opportunity to seek protection from persecution and torture in Uganda," where the government has indicated he could be sen
Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/abrego-garcias-attorneys-blast-government-unilaterally-rearresting/story

TomSlick
(12,717 posts)Immigration courts aren't real courts or immigration judges real judges.
Immigration courts are executive department agencies. They are not Article III courts. Immigration judges are executive department employees and not independent judicial officers.
And as he was ordered back into the country by the federal courts, I don't see how he can use that entry to when he didn't apply initially upon entering the country.
LetMyPeopleVote
(169,853 posts)Kilmar Abrego Garcia wasnât eligible for asylum because it had been more than a year since he entered the country.
— Mrs. Betty Bowers (@mrsbettybowers.bsky.social) 2025-08-28T15:28:33.573Z
So Kristi Noem allowed him to reenter again this year, resetting the clock. He has now applied.
Kristi is smart that way.
LeftInTX
(34,006 posts)And are not switched out like US attorneys
https://tracreports.org/immigration/reports/judgereports/
This was his previous judge:
Kessler, Elizabeth A.
554 48.7% 1.8% 49.5%
She is 50/50 on denials.
Abrego likely fell into 1.8%: Granted Other Relief
Based on what I know, it's probably going to be years before his asylum case is heard.
Way after his criminal trial.
I don't think he's eligible for an expedited hearing, but who knows?
I think if he's found guilty, I don't think he will eligible. But he will likely be eligible to stay while his appeal is heard. Also his charges could be downgraded. But even then, he will likely be denied. Who knows?
If he's found not guilty, he will linger around and wait for his asylum case, which will be a long time from now.
LetMyPeopleVote
(169,853 posts)The Salvadoran man who was illegally deported in March has reasserted his claim for asylum.
Link to tweet
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/27/kilmar-abrego-garcia-asylum-00531024
In response to a query from POLITICO, Sandoval-Moshenberg said his clients recent reentry into the U.S. entitles him to a new bid for asylum.
Abrego last sought asylum in 2019 during immigration-court proceedings, but a judge denied his claim, saying he had waited too long after entering the United States to file it.
The only reason that Mr. Abrego Garcia was denied asylum was that he had failed to apply within one year of arriving in the United States as required, Sandoval-Moshenberg said. Now, Mr. Abrego Garcia has returned to the United States less than one year ago, and so is eligible to apply.
During a video conference Wednesday in Abregos new lawsuit, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis said that she has no jurisdiction over the renewed asylum claim but that she intends to hold a hearing Oct. 6 on Abregos bid to block his deportation to Uganda.