Trump says he's removing Fed Governor Lisa Cook, cites mortgage fraud allegations
Source: CNBC
Published Mon, Aug 25 2025 8:09 PM EDT Updated Moments Ago
President Donald Trump on Monday fired Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, according to a letter on his Truth Social, an unprecedented move and a significant escalation of his attacks on the independence of the U.S. central bank.
Pursuant to my authority under Article II of the Constitution of the United States and the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, as amended, you are hereby removed from your position on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, effective immediately, Trump wrote.
CNBC reached out to the Federal Reserve for comment.
Trumps move pushes the Federal Reserve into unchartered territory and will likely lead to a legal clash that could wind up at the Supreme Court.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/25/trump-fires-lisa-cook-fed-powell.html
Article updated.
Previous articles/headlines -
President Donald Trump on Monday fired Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, according to a letter on his Truth Social, an unprecedented move and a significant escalation of his attacks on the U.S. central bank.
"Pursuant to my authority under Article II of the Constitution of the United States and the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, as amended, you are hereby removed from your position on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, effective immediately," Trump wrote.
CNBC reached out to the Federal Reserve for comment.
Trump's move pushes the Federal Reserve into unchartered territory and will likely lead to a legal clash that could wind up at the Supreme Court.
Published Mon, Aug 25 2025 8:09 PM EDT Updated 3 Min Ago
President Donald Trump on Monday fired Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, according to a letter on his Truth Social, an unprecedented move and a significant escalation of his attacks on the U.S. central bank.
"Pursuant to my authority under Article II of the Constitution of the United States and the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, as amended, you are hereby removed from your position on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, effective immediately," Trump wrote. CNBC reached out to the Federal Reserve for comment.
Trump's move pushes the Federal Reserve into unchartered territory and will likely lead to a legal clash that could wind up at the Supreme Court.
Congress curbed the president's authority to unilaterally fire a Fed governor in the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which states that president can only do so "for cause." While the law does not elaborate on what constitutes "cause," it has historically been understood to mean serious concerns about an official's ability to continue serving.
Original article -
President Donald Trump on Monday fired Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, according to a Truth Social post, an unprecedented move and a significant escalation of his attacks on the U.S. central bank.
Trump's move pushes the Federal Reserve into unchartered territory and will likely lead to a legal clash that could wind up at the Supreme Court.
Congress curbed the president's authority to unilaterally fire a Fed governor in the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which states that president can only do so "for cause." While the law does not elaborate on what constitutes "cause," it has historically been understood to mean serious concerns about an official's ability to continue serving.
The Trump administration claims that Cook, who was nominated by former President Joe Biden in 2022, committed mortgage fraud by allegedly naming two different properties as her primary residence at the same time.

angryxyouth
(297 posts)That is code for being black. And how many people have signed off on bad mortgages for Trump? Didnt New York just win a lawsuit about that very issue.
FBaggins
(28,431 posts)I believe that it was applying to mortgages just a couple of weeks apart in two different states, while declaring that both were going to be her principal residence.
The problem here is that it's just an allegation at this point that DOJ is reportedly investigating. While the president has the power to remove fed governors for cause... I think he has to wait for her to be at least indicted.
herding cats
(19,841 posts)I don't think this is the end of this saga.
IbogaProject
(4,976 posts)And basically she could have "changed" her mind the day after the initial closing. If they try and litigate the government would have the burden to prove beyond a doubt that action was fraud. She really doesn't have to prove much of anything unless they make a serious enough claim and her attorneys wish to fight.
FBaggins
(28,431 posts)You have to sign again at closing - and it's highly unlikely that she settled on the first one before the second one had an application.
Even if that somehow worked out... every mortgage I've seen says that you have to move in within 60 days of closing and live there for at least a year in order to qualify. There's a sworn affidavit of occupancy signed at closing - it isn't just a checked box. 18 USC section 1014 makes it a felony.
Now - none of that has been proven to have happened in her case. But there doesn't appear to be a "I thought so at the time then changed my mind" loophole.
IbogaProject
(4,976 posts)I hope our society starts fighting for justice and the well being of the vast majority of everyone.
Chemical Bill
(2,916 posts)My irony meter just exploded.
gab13by13
(29,784 posts)She will leave without a fight.
riversedge
(77,782 posts)Lovie777
(20,247 posts)he can not.
riversedge
(77,782 posts)This makes me very scared as it seems that money will continue flow upward-and upwards.
.........If Trump is ultimately successful in removing Cook, he will be able to nominate her replacement and reshape the Feds governing board for the next several years. Fed governors typically serve 14-year terms.
jmbar2
(7,307 posts)I've been hoping for a good pullback, but not due to despotism.
onenote
(45,638 posts)Dow futures are down around 35-40 points as of 10:45. A de minims drop.
jmbar2
(7,307 posts)Then recovered, more quickly than I would have anticipated.
Lovie777
(20,247 posts)rinse and repeat..........
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(128,678 posts)Tanuki
(16,067 posts)thought crime
(787 posts)His supporters love it when he takes action against a Black Woman in a position of power.
lostincalifornia
(4,458 posts)"Trump Moves to Fire Feds Cook, Escalating Central Bank Attack
President Donald Trump moved to oust Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook following allegations from a White House ally that she falsified mortgage documents, a dramatic escalation in his battle to exert more control over the US central bank.
In a letter he posted on Truth Social Monday, Trump said he had determined he had sufficient cause to fire Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Fed Board in Washington, based on the allegations that she made false statements on one or more mortgage loans. The move could give Trump another chance to name someone to the Fed board as he repeatedly pressures officials to lower interest rates.
............
It wasnt immediately clear whether Cook intended to challenge the dismissal in the courts. If she does, she could immediately seek an injunction reinstating her while litigation moves forward. No charges have been filed against her, though a Justice Department official last week signaled possible plans to investigate her.
The Fed declined to comment. Cook didnt immediately respond to a request for comment.
This is a kill shot at Fed independence, said Aaron Klein, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. Trump is saying the Fed is going to do what he wants it to do, by hook or by crook.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-08-26/trump-removes-fed-governor-lisa-cook-effective-immediately?srnd=homepage-americas
moonshinegnomie
(3,638 posts)"President Trump purported to fire me 'for cause' when no cause exists under the law, and he has no authority to do so. I will not resign. I will continue to carry out my duties to help the American economy as I have been doing since 2022.
Just received this statement from Lisa Cook:
— Ben Casselman (@bencasselman.bsky.social) 2025-08-26T03:02:35.802Z
"President Trump purported to fire me 'for cause' when no cause exists under the law, and he has no authority to do so. I will not resign. I will continue to carry out my duties to help the American economy as I have been doing since 2022."
twodogsbarking
(15,775 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(169,809 posts)At issue is an attempted White House power grab that ignores the rule of law and puts global economic stability at risk.
Why should people care about Trumpâs offensive against the Fedâs Lisa Cook?
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-08-26T12:52:39.622Z
At issue is an attempted White House power grab, launched by an authoritarian president, that ignores the rule of law and puts global economic stability at risk. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trumps-offensive-feds-lisa-cook-five-alarm-fire-rcna227188
President Donald Trump is removing Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook effective immediately, according to a letter he posted to Truth Social on Monday night. In the letter, Trump writes: Pursuant to my authority under Article II of the Constitution of the United States and the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, as amended, you are hereby removed from your position on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, effective immediately.
This is a story with a lot of moving parts, so lets unpack the relevant details and review what we know.
Whos Lisa Cook?
Joe Biden appointed Cook, an accomplished economist, to the Federal Reserves board of governors three years ago, and at that point, she became the first Black woman to serve on the Fed board. Her tenure has been uncontroversial, at least until last week.
.......Are the allegations credible?
Theres reason for skepticism. Pulte is both a critic of the Fed and a White House loyalist The Washington Post, for example, recently described the FHFA chief as a prominent Trump sidekick whos conveniently started going after a variety of Trump targets with dubious claims of mortgage fraud.
......Has the U.S. Supreme Court weighed in on the subject?
As a matter of fact, it was just three months ago when Republican-appointed justices granted the president considerable power to oust officials serving in independent agencies, but simultaneously, the high court explicitly said that the Federal Reserve is a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity. That distinction appears to limit Trumps powers over the Fed.
Why would Trump be so eager to target the Fed in the first place?
Because the White House wants to seize control over U.S. monetary policy, especially as it relates to interest rates. Trump has already launched an unprecedented campaign against Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, and if the president is able to force out Cook and replace her with someone wholl do the White Houses bidding, it would gut the institutions independence and shift power in the Oval Offices direction.
Why would that be dangerous?
Because, as Paul Krugman explained, the Fed is responsible for everything from interest rates to bank supervision to avoiding systemic financial crises. If Trump successfully corrupts the institution and its work, Krugman said, We become Venezuela. We become Turkey. We become a place where all of this stuff is just at the whims of the strongman in charge. ... No president should have the power to just arbitrarily control what the Fed does, and least of all this president. So, this is the road to things going completely wild not five years down the pike, but months from now.
He added, This is a five-alarm fire.
travelingthrulife
(3,251 posts)Did a black woman refuse to let Trump paw her or something?
republianmushroom
(21,375 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(169,809 posts)The high court majority recently went out of its way to signal its intention to protect the Federal Reserve boards independence.
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/lisa-cook-fired-federal-reserve-supreme-court-humphreys-rcna227270
Now, Trumps attempt to fire Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook could test the high courts strange signal.
In that May shadow docket case, Trump v. Wilcox, which involved members of the National Labor Relations Board and Merit Systems Protection Board, the majority addressed those board members argument that the logic behind stripping their protections would also imperil the Federal Reserves independence.
We disagree, the majority wrote, citing a previous precedent in noting that the Fed is a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity that follows in the distinct historical tradition of the First and Second Banks of the United States.
Dissenting in the Wilcox case, Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the Democratic appointees that she appreciated the majoritys intention to avoid imperiling the Fed but that its decision still posed a puzzle. Thats because the Federal Reserves independence rests on the same foundation as agencies such as the NLRB and the MSPB which, Kagan pointed out, means it rests on a nearly century-old precedent, Humphreys Executor. The Trump administration wants to overturn that 1935 decision, and the majoritys recent rulings on presidential power suggest that its on board with that effort.
If the idea is to reassure the markets, a simpler and more judicial approach would have been to rule against Trump on the continued authority of Humphreys, Kagan wrote in Wilcox......
While it will depend on how exactly Cook presses her legal claim and how the administration defends itself, the cases resolution could turn on the narrower issue of the sufficiency of cause for removal, as opposed to the justices resolving the outer limits of presidential authority when it comes to the Federal Reserve. Given Kagans critique of the logic behind the majoritys Fed carveout in Wilcox (not that the majority has to care about that), the majority might appreciate such narrower grounds as a way of solving the puzzle, as Kagan put it, that the court created for itself.
We may see trump's attorney citing Justice Kagan's dissent in this litigation. I think that Justice Kagan has the better argument, but the majority may be committed to defend their prior bad shadow docket ruling which will hurt trump's argument.