Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(160,177 posts)
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 08:15 PM Aug 25

Trump says he's removing Fed Governor Lisa Cook, cites mortgage fraud allegations

Source: CNBC

Published Mon, Aug 25 2025 8:09 PM EDT Updated Moments Ago


President Donald Trump on Monday fired Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, according to a letter on his Truth Social, an unprecedented move and a significant escalation of his attacks on the independence of the U.S. central bank.

“Pursuant to my authority under Article II of the Constitution of the United States and the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, as amended, you are hereby removed from your position on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, effective immediately,” Trump wrote.

CNBC reached out to the Federal Reserve for comment.

Trump’s move pushes the Federal Reserve into unchartered territory and will likely lead to a legal clash that could wind up at the Supreme Court.

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/08/25/trump-fires-lisa-cook-fed-powell.html



Article updated.

Previous articles/headlines -

Published Mon, Aug 25 2025 8:09 PM EDT Updated Moments Ago


President Donald Trump on Monday fired Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, according to a letter on his Truth Social, an unprecedented move and a significant escalation of his attacks on the U.S. central bank.

"Pursuant to my authority under Article II of the Constitution of the United States and the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, as amended, you are hereby removed from your position on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, effective immediately," Trump wrote.

CNBC reached out to the Federal Reserve for comment.

Trump's move pushes the Federal Reserve into unchartered territory and will likely lead to a legal clash that could wind up at the Supreme Court.


Trump says he is removing Fed Governor Lisa Cook

Published Mon, Aug 25 2025 8:09 PM EDT Updated 3 Min Ago


President Donald Trump on Monday fired Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, according to a letter on his Truth Social, an unprecedented move and a significant escalation of his attacks on the U.S. central bank.

"Pursuant to my authority under Article II of the Constitution of the United States and the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, as amended, you are hereby removed from your position on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, effective immediately," Trump wrote. CNBC reached out to the Federal Reserve for comment.

Trump's move pushes the Federal Reserve into unchartered territory and will likely lead to a legal clash that could wind up at the Supreme Court.

Congress curbed the president's authority to unilaterally fire a Fed governor in the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which states that president can only do so "for cause." While the law does not elaborate on what constitutes "cause," it has historically been understood to mean serious concerns about an official's ability to continue serving.


Original article -

Published Mon, Aug 25 2025 8:09 PM EDT Updated 4 Min Ago


President Donald Trump on Monday fired Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, according to a Truth Social post, an unprecedented move and a significant escalation of his attacks on the U.S. central bank.

Trump's move pushes the Federal Reserve into unchartered territory and will likely lead to a legal clash that could wind up at the Supreme Court.

Congress curbed the president's authority to unilaterally fire a Fed governor in the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which states that president can only do so "for cause." While the law does not elaborate on what constitutes "cause," it has historically been understood to mean serious concerns about an official's ability to continue serving.

The Trump administration claims that Cook, who was nominated by former President Joe Biden in 2022, committed mortgage fraud by allegedly naming two different properties as her primary residence at the same time.
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump says he's removing Fed Governor Lisa Cook, cites mortgage fraud allegations (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Aug 25 OP
Signed off on bad mortgages? angryxyouth Aug 25 #1
Not signed off on... the allegation is that she committed the fraud herself FBaggins Aug 25 #4
This is my understanding as well. herding cats Aug 25 #5
That can still be ok if she really planned on each being her residence at that time IbogaProject Aug 25 #8
Not really - the dates are too close together FBaggins Aug 25 #12
Thank you IbogaProject Aug 25 #17
Trump accusing anyone of any kind of real estate fraud? Chemical Bill Aug 25 #15
I don't think gab13by13 Aug 25 #2
That will require lots of money, which I hope she can raise. riversedge Aug 25 #6
To my understanding............ Lovie777 Aug 25 #9
...If Trump is ultimately successful in removing Cook, he will be able to nominate her replacement and reshape the Fed's riversedge Aug 25 #3
Futures markets not taking this well... jmbar2 Aug 25 #7
I don't see much of a reaction from the futures markets. onenote Aug 25 #16
It had a pretty fast dip when the news came out. jmbar2 Aug 25 #19
Also history.......... Lovie777 Aug 25 #10
Stagflation, here it comes. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 25 #11
Elizabeth Warren responds: Tanuki Aug 25 #13
Revenge and Performative Warfare. thought crime Aug 25 #14
Here is Bloomberg News account lostincalifornia Aug 25 #18
list cook responded moonshinegnomie Aug 25 #20
Says the turd who was convicted of lying to banks over and over and over again. This dance is gonna be a drag. twodogsbarking Aug 26 #21
MaddowBlog-Why Trump's offensive against the Fed's Lisa Cook is a 'five-alarm fire' LetMyPeopleVote Aug 26 #22
Black women are not allowed to have good jobs in the US. travelingthrulife Aug 26 #23
Says the man with 34 felony fraud convictions. republianmushroom Aug 26 #24
Deadline: Legal Blog--Trump's attempt to fire a Federal Reserve governor tests a weird Supreme Court move LetMyPeopleVote Aug 26 #25

angryxyouth

(297 posts)
1. Signed off on bad mortgages?
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 08:23 PM
Aug 25

That is code for being black. And how many people have signed off on bad mortgages for Trump? Didn’t New York just win a lawsuit about that very issue.

FBaggins

(28,431 posts)
4. Not signed off on... the allegation is that she committed the fraud herself
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 08:32 PM
Aug 25

I believe that it was applying to mortgages just a couple of weeks apart in two different states, while declaring that both were going to be her principal residence.

The problem here is that it's just an allegation at this point that DOJ is reportedly investigating. While the president has the power to remove fed governors for cause... I think he has to wait for her to be at least indicted.

IbogaProject

(4,976 posts)
8. That can still be ok if she really planned on each being her residence at that time
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 09:01 PM
Aug 25

And basically she could have "changed" her mind the day after the initial closing. If they try and litigate the government would have the burden to prove beyond a doubt that action was fraud. She really doesn't have to prove much of anything unless they make a serious enough claim and her attorneys wish to fight.

FBaggins

(28,431 posts)
12. Not really - the dates are too close together
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 09:18 PM
Aug 25

You have to sign again at closing - and it's highly unlikely that she settled on the first one before the second one had an application.

Even if that somehow worked out... every mortgage I've seen says that you have to move in within 60 days of closing and live there for at least a year in order to qualify. There's a sworn affidavit of occupancy signed at closing - it isn't just a checked box. 18 USC section 1014 makes it a felony.

Now - none of that has been proven to have happened in her case. But there doesn't appear to be a "I thought so at the time then changed my mind" loophole.

IbogaProject

(4,976 posts)
17. Thank you
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 11:03 PM
Aug 25

I hope our society starts fighting for justice and the well being of the vast majority of everyone.

riversedge

(77,782 posts)
3. ...If Trump is ultimately successful in removing Cook, he will be able to nominate her replacement and reshape the Fed's
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 08:29 PM
Aug 25

This makes me very scared as it seems that money will continue flow upward-and upwards.


.........If Trump is ultimately successful in removing Cook, he will be able to nominate her replacement and reshape the Fed’s governing board for the next several years. Fed governors typically serve 14-year terms.

jmbar2

(7,307 posts)
7. Futures markets not taking this well...
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 08:43 PM
Aug 25

I've been hoping for a good pullback, but not due to despotism.

onenote

(45,638 posts)
16. I don't see much of a reaction from the futures markets.
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 10:43 PM
Aug 25

Dow futures are down around 35-40 points as of 10:45. A de minims drop.

jmbar2

(7,307 posts)
19. It had a pretty fast dip when the news came out.
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 11:14 PM
Aug 25

Then recovered, more quickly than I would have anticipated.

thought crime

(787 posts)
14. Revenge and Performative Warfare.
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 09:33 PM
Aug 25

His supporters love it when he takes action against a Black Woman in a position of power.

lostincalifornia

(4,458 posts)
18. Here is Bloomberg News account
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 11:09 PM
Aug 25

"Trump Moves to Fire Fed’s Cook, Escalating Central Bank Attack

President Donald Trump moved to oust Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook following allegations from a White House ally that she falsified mortgage documents, a dramatic escalation in his battle to exert more control over the US central bank.

In a letter he posted on Truth Social Monday, Trump said he had determined he had “sufficient cause” to fire Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Fed Board in Washington, based on the allegations that she made false statements on one or more mortgage loans. The move could give Trump another chance to name someone to the Fed board as he repeatedly pressures officials to lower interest rates.

............

It wasn’t immediately clear whether Cook intended to challenge the dismissal in the courts. If she does, she could immediately seek an injunction reinstating her while litigation moves forward. No charges have been filed against her, though a Justice Department official last week signaled possible plans to investigate her.

The Fed declined to comment. Cook didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

“This is a kill shot at Fed independence,” said Aaron Klein, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. “Trump is saying the Fed is going to do what he wants it to do, by hook or by crook.”

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-08-26/trump-removes-fed-governor-lisa-cook-effective-immediately?srnd=homepage-americas





moonshinegnomie

(3,638 posts)
20. list cook responded
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 11:51 PM
Aug 25

"President Trump purported to fire me 'for cause' when no cause exists under the law, and he has no authority to do so. I will not resign. I will continue to carry out my duties to help the American economy as I have been doing since 2022.

Just received this statement from Lisa Cook:
"President Trump purported to fire me 'for cause' when no cause exists under the law, and he has no authority to do so. I will not resign. I will continue to carry out my duties to help the American economy as I have been doing since 2022."

Ben Casselman (@bencasselman.bsky.social) 2025-08-26T03:02:35.802Z

twodogsbarking

(15,775 posts)
21. Says the turd who was convicted of lying to banks over and over and over again. This dance is gonna be a drag.
Tue Aug 26, 2025, 08:00 AM
Aug 26

LetMyPeopleVote

(169,809 posts)
22. MaddowBlog-Why Trump's offensive against the Fed's Lisa Cook is a 'five-alarm fire'
Tue Aug 26, 2025, 09:23 AM
Aug 26

At issue is an attempted White House power grab that ignores the rule of law and puts global economic stability at risk.

Why should people care about Trump’s offensive against the Fed’s Lisa Cook?

At issue is an attempted White House power grab, launched by an authoritarian president, that ignores the rule of law and puts global economic stability at risk. www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-08-26T12:52:39.622Z

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trumps-offensive-feds-lisa-cook-five-alarm-fire-rcna227188

Evidently, he was serious — at least about his intentions. NBC News reported:

President Donald Trump is removing Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook effective immediately, according to a letter he posted to Truth Social on Monday night. In the letter, Trump writes: ‘Pursuant to my authority under Article II of the Constitution of the United States and the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, as amended, you are hereby removed from your position on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, effective immediately.’


This is a story with a lot of moving parts, so let’s unpack the relevant details and review what we know.

Who’s Lisa Cook?

Joe Biden appointed Cook, an accomplished economist, to the Federal Reserve’s board of governors three years ago, and at that point, she became the first Black woman to serve on the Fed board. Her tenure has been uncontroversial, at least until last week.

.......Are the allegations credible?

There’s reason for skepticism. Pulte is both a critic of the Fed and a White House loyalist — The Washington Post, for example, recently described the FHFA chief as “a prominent Trump sidekick” — who’s conveniently started going after a variety of Trump targets with dubious claims of mortgage fraud.

......Has the U.S. Supreme Court weighed in on the subject?

As a matter of fact, it was just three months ago when Republican-appointed justices granted the president considerable power to oust officials serving in independent agencies, but simultaneously, the high court explicitly said that the Federal Reserve is a “uniquely structured, quasi-private entity.” That distinction appears to limit Trump’s powers over the Fed.

Why would Trump be so eager to target the Fed in the first place?

Because the White House wants to seize control over U.S. monetary policy, especially as it relates to interest rates. Trump has already launched an unprecedented campaign against Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, and if the president is able to force out Cook and replace her with someone who’ll do the White House’s bidding, it would gut the institution’s independence and shift power in the Oval Office’s direction.

Why would that be dangerous?

Because, as Paul Krugman explained, the Fed is responsible for everything from interest rates to bank supervision to avoiding systemic financial crises. If Trump successfully corrupts the institution and its work, Krugman said, “We become Venezuela. We become Turkey. We become a place where all of this stuff is just at the whims of the strongman in charge. ... No president should have the power to just arbitrarily control what the Fed does, and least of all this president. So, this is the road to things going completely wild — not five years down the pike, but months from now.”

He added, “This is a five-alarm fire.”

travelingthrulife

(3,251 posts)
23. Black women are not allowed to have good jobs in the US.
Tue Aug 26, 2025, 09:33 AM
Aug 26

Did a black woman refuse to let Trump paw her or something?

LetMyPeopleVote

(169,809 posts)
25. Deadline: Legal Blog--Trump's attempt to fire a Federal Reserve governor tests a weird Supreme Court move
Tue Aug 26, 2025, 07:32 PM
Aug 26

The high court majority recently went out of its way to signal its intention to protect the Federal Reserve board’s independence.

https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/lisa-cook-fired-federal-reserve-supreme-court-humphreys-rcna227270

Back in May, when a divided Supreme Court gave President Donald Trump the power to fire members of certain labor boards without cause, the Republican-appointed majority went out of its way to signal its intention to protect the Federal Reserve board, even though the Fed itself wasn’t at issue in that case.

Now, Trump’s attempt to fire Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook could test the high court’s strange signal.

In that May shadow docket case, Trump v. Wilcox, which involved members of the National Labor Relations Board and Merit Systems Protection Board, the majority addressed those board members’ argument that the logic behind stripping their protections would also imperil the Federal Reserve’s independence.

“We disagree,” the majority wrote, citing a previous precedent in noting that the Fed “is a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity that follows in the distinct historical tradition of the First and Second Banks of the United States.”

Dissenting in the Wilcox case, Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the Democratic appointees that she appreciated the majority’s “intention to avoid imperiling the Fed” but that its decision still posed “a puzzle.” That’s because the Federal Reserve’s independence rests on the same foundation as agencies such as the NLRB and the MSPB — which, Kagan pointed out, means it rests on a nearly century-old precedent, Humphrey’s Executor. The Trump administration wants to overturn that 1935 decision, and the majority’s recent rulings on presidential power suggest that it’s on board with that effort.

“If the idea is to reassure the markets, a simpler — and more judicial — approach would have been to” rule against Trump “on the continued authority of Humphrey’s,” Kagan wrote in Wilcox......

While it will depend on how exactly Cook presses her legal claim and how the administration defends itself, the case’s resolution could turn on the narrower issue of the sufficiency of cause for removal, as opposed to the justices resolving the outer limits of presidential authority when it comes to the Federal Reserve. Given Kagan’s critique of the logic behind the majority’s Fed carveout in Wilcox (not that the majority has to care about that), the majority might appreciate such narrower grounds as a way of solving the “puzzle,” as Kagan put it, that the court created for itself.

We may see trump's attorney citing Justice Kagan's dissent in this litigation. I think that Justice Kagan has the better argument, but the majority may be committed to defend their prior bad shadow docket ruling which will hurt trump's argument.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump says he's removing ...