Bluesky Goes Dark in Mississippi Over Age Verification Law
Source: Wired
PEOPLE IN MISSISSIPPI can no longer use the social media platform Bluesky. The company announced Friday that it will be blocking all IP addresses within Mississippi for the foreseeable future in response to a recent US Supreme Court decision that allows the state to enforce strict age verification for social media platforms.
According to Bluesky, Mississippis approach to verification would fundamentally change how users access the site. We think this law creates challenges that go beyond its child safety goals, and creates significant barriers that limit free speech and disproportionately harm smaller platforms and emerging technologies, the Bluesky team said in its statement.
Bluesky did not respond to a request for comment.
The company says that compliance with Mississippis lawwhich would require identifying and tracking all users under 18, in addition to asking every user for sensitive personal information to verify their ageis not possible with the teams current resources and infrastructure. By not complying with the law, Bluesky could face fines of up to $10,000 per violation. It is the first major social media platform to take such drastic steps in response to the law.
Read more: https://www.wired.com/story/bluesky-goes-dark-in-mississippi-age-verification/

Eliot Rosewater
(33,744 posts)So red states are going to silence Patriots, big surprise
Polybius
(20,725 posts)msongs
(72,165 posts)mdbl
(7,212 posts)Bluesky doesn't.
Shipwack
(2,822 posts)I dont think BlueSky is profitable yet.
mdbl
(7,212 posts)I hope Bluesky remains as it is if it can eke by financially.
Shipwack
(2,822 posts)I too am hoping BlueSky stays around.
Even 2-bit brick and mortar vape stores with an online presence have age verification. Don't get me wrong - It's a BS law - but I also don't understand what "infrastructure" deficiencies could block them from getting one of the many "software as a service" outfits to provide the verification service. Bluesky isn't exactly small potatoes; their valuation is ~$700 million.
reACTIONary
(6,658 posts)Mississippi's age verification laws are significantly broader and more stringent than the current federal requirements, which are much more limited in scope. Federal law does not impose a single, uniform age verification framework for all online platforms. In contrast, Mississippi is among a growing number of states enacting specific, and often more burdensome, verification standards for websites and social media.
BradBo
(766 posts)The Wizard
(13,354 posts)for good cause. They haven't a clue that the welfare they use to survive is a government program. End Civil War reconstruction now.
reACTIONary
(6,658 posts)Our Concerns About Mississippis Approach
While we share the goal of protecting young people online, we have concerns about this laws implementation:
Broad scope: The law requires age verification for all users, not just those accessing age-restricted content, which affects the ability of everyone in Mississippi to use Bluesky.
Barriers to innovation: The compliance requirements disadvantage newer and smaller platforms like Bluesky, which do not have the luxury of big teams to build the necessary tooling. The law makes it harder for people to engage in free expression and chills the opportunity to communicate in new ways.
Privacy implications: The law requires collecting and storing sensitive personal information from all users, including detailed tracking of minors.
FakeNoose
(38,345 posts)Yeah, I didn't think so. Yep, it's total bullshit.
intheflow
(29,650 posts)Basically, a boycott of Mississippi over all-age privacy concerns.
Dave Bowman
(5,706 posts)What a bunch of cowards.
OldBaldy1701E
(8,779 posts)They don't give one shit about 'the kids'.
JoseBalow
(8,223 posts)Wonder Why
(6,082 posts)summer_in_TX
(3,778 posts)Last edited Tue Aug 26, 2025, 12:42 AM - Edit history (1)
So it's not clear to me how it stays funded. It's a wonderful platform, and I'd gladly pay a monthly membership fee.
No algorithms pushing sensational content.
Almost completely self-control of our personal algorithm - except for the Discover feed, which you can get rid of.
Filters can suit your own interests (I don't see much about crypto or AI for example, unless it's an article by someone I follow). I don't have to block people hardly ever, because I can filter out by words or terms, like typical anti-trans or pro-Trump content.
No ads
Bluesky and Substack are my two go-to's for discussions and great articles.
Seeking Serenity
(3,223 posts)Probably get a tax deduction for doing it, too.
Yay, billionaires!
Grins
(8,757 posts)HarryM
(417 posts)Lawmakers do not have a clue as to the technology. It is so simple to fake your age and location today, its laughable. Start with a VPN add stock photos fake ID, and there you go.
But the folks making the law have a hard time spelling the word Internet, let alone knowing how it works.
JohnnyRingo
(20,107 posts)There will be no age verification laws in states that elect sane representatives. At least for now.
Of course if voters want the state to babysit their children for them they should be thrilled with this and re-election is certain.