Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(158,903 posts)
Fri Aug 22, 2025, 07:10 AM Friday

Missouri appears likely to redraw congressional map during Trump's redistricting push

Source: CBS News

August 21, 2025 / 8:04 PM EDT


President Trump signaled Thursday that Missouri will be the next state to redraw its congressional lines to benefit the Republican Party ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. It's a continuation of the arms race between Republican-and Democratic-controlled states over redistricting, kickstarted by President Trump. At the president's urging, the GOP-controlled Texas state House passed a new, heavily Republican map this week, with the state Senate expected to vote on the new districts Friday.

In a post on Truth Social on Thursday, Trump wrote, "The Great State of Missouri is now IN. I'm not surprised… We're going to win the Midterms in Missouri again, bigger and better than ever before!" He later said in a radio interview the same day that Missouri, Indiana and Florida are the next GOP-controlled states he believes will redraw congressional maps to create more Republican districts.

Missouri has eight U.S. House seats in Congress, and two of them are held by Democrats. Any effort to draw a new district to give Republicans one more seat in their favor would likely focus on changing the Kansas City-focused district represented by longtime Democratic Rep. Emanuel Cleaver.

A spokesperson for Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe, who has not yet made the call for a special session for redistricting, said he's continuing to have conversations with state leadership "to assess options for a special session that would allow the General Assembly to provide congressional districts that best represent Missourians."

Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/missouri-appears-likely-to-redraw-congressional-map-during-trumps-redistricting-push/



The "red states" were already gerrymandered (which is what made them "red states" where they used to be a mix). So the media needs to stop framing the issue without emphasizing this point.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

cstanleytech

(27,890 posts)
1. The Red States are forgetting that they risk gavelizing Democrats to cost them in other ways such as governorships.
Fri Aug 22, 2025, 08:49 AM
Friday

Not to mention the State and Federal Senate seats.

Cheezoholic

(3,246 posts)
2. Yep. My state votes D around 40% across the board but we've had 2 D seats and 3 purple districts erased in 10 yrs
Fri Aug 22, 2025, 01:28 PM
Friday

Bot to mention 25% of state D districts wiped out. The new proposed maps would cut the 2 biggest college communities in half, splitting them in with new red districts. Marion county, where Indianapolis is located had its vey wealthy northern quarter cleaved out of that very blue 7th district into my district, a very purple district in 2010. The new map would further shrink the 7th into the 5th and expand the 5th halfway into a college county that locally is very blue. All of the college towns representations will be fucked. 2 D district's left, the lower 2/3d's of the county Indianapolis is in and East Chicago/Gary. They cleaved off Hammond and South Bend into new R districts also with the new maps.

cabotnn22

(151 posts)
3. To be fair, gerrymandering is used by both parties
Fri Aug 22, 2025, 07:47 PM
Friday

look at new england. there are no republican congress critters from new england. illinois is gerrymandered to a stupid degree - look at the districts.

the vast majority of states carve out and gerrymander for the benefit of the party in power. it isn't right - no matter which party is doing it. this is why state legislatures shouldn't be the ones creating congressional districts. apparently, they can't be trusted. i don't know what the solution is. maybe base it on population - if you have a certain percentage of democrats or republicans in a state - then perhaps their congressional delegation should reflect that percentage. i don't know. the system in existence at present, however, obviously doesn't work and is prone to corruption.

Cheezoholic

(3,246 posts)
4. Not saying my state was an exception, but how bad it's gotten since 2010. Both sides DO NOT do what TX is doing now!
Fri Aug 22, 2025, 10:04 PM
Friday

No way, no how! Whilst I agree there's a point to SOME both siderism to gerrymandering in principle, the fact of the matter mid-decade gerrymandering (except when standing maps, usually after reapportionment after a census, having been being found unconstitutional) was only done once before, by you guessed it, Texas in 2003. It's what assured that TX would steadily move to the right for the next 20 years once SCOTUS up held it in 2006. NO BLUE STATE has done it mid census without being forced to by a court. Ohio voted and passed an amendment requiring independent panels, the repuke legislature told them to go get fucked. Same with MO. Hell those 2 states have repealed immediately an untold number of things the voters approved via public ballots and wanted because thats what THEY do, not us, when they have full power. I'll buy gerrymandering in and of itself HAS been done in the past by both sides but what the repukes are doing now is completely out of control. There is NO BOTH SIDES to this mid census partisan map BS.

AND I'll add by our side playing more fairly when it comes to these maps, by requiring more indepent panels to draw them etc than they do or even offering them on the ballot every 10 years, repukes have beat us 2-1 with the number of super majorities in state legislatures. ]THAT RIGHT THERE is where they are heading with these mid census maps because they are a handful of states away from a Constitutional Convention. They so close they can taste it like a starving lion whose been following a herd of Zebras for months. They know they will NEVER get this chance in another 150 years and they will DIE!. The midterms are a head fake. The Constitutional Convention is the final touchdown, game over.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Missouri appears likely t...