Republicans sue to block Newsom's fast-track California redistricting plan
Source: The Guardian
Tue 19 Aug 2025 14.47 EDT
Last modified on Tue 19 Aug 2025 14.58 EDT
Republican state legislators in California filed suit on Tuesday to block a mid-year redistricting plan meant to counter Texass effort to redraw congressional district lines. The emergency petition argues that the process being used in the California assembly violates laws requiring a 30-day period between the introduction of legislation and voting on it.
Instead of a months-long transparent and participatory process overseen by an independent citizens redistricting commission for such a sensitive matter, the public would be presented instead with an up or down vote on maps unilaterally prepared in secret by the Legislature, states the filing on behalf of senators Tony Strickland and Suzette Martinez Valladares, assemblyman Tri Ta and assemblywoman Kathryn Sanchez.
Californias governor, Gavin Newsom, announced his states redistricting plan last week in terms on social media mocking Donald Trumps flamboyance, intent on using the voting power of the USs most populous state to counteract Texass redrawn map, which would be expected to deliver a net gain of five congressional seats to Republicans in 2026.
Newsom praised the California effort on Monday, calling it a necessary response to Trumps influence over redistricting in Texas and other Republican-led states. We are not going to sit idle while they command Texas and other states to rig the next election to keep power, Newsom said, adding that the proposal gives Californians a choice to fight back.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/19/california-gavin-newsom-redistricting-republicans


Karasu
(2,003 posts)MrWowWow
(1,228 posts)if California voters approve Newsoms plan and Democrats net the projected +5 seats, that would be enough by itself to flip the U.S. House majority from Republican to Democratic, given the current 219216 split.
Karasu
(2,003 posts)rig the system forever.
Fucking party of lawless power-mad idiots. Don't like it? Drop the Texas shit.
The Texas gerrymandering effort is the first shot of this generation's Fort Sumter attack.
hadEnuf
(3,397 posts)Don't skip a beat with these m-effer's. Expose them widely.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,207 posts)while upholding Texas.
Newark65
(30 posts)Karasu
(2,003 posts)isn't the initiator and is even putting their redistricting to a vote, while the Republicans are doing this to cement their power forever and are acting unilaterally to do it, with no one else getting a say in the process and being punished if they so much as try.
reACTIONary
(6,710 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(5,207 posts)Even if they don't have jurisdiction, they will assume jurisdiction and give Trump the win. The Thomas court is bought and paid for.
reACTIONary
(6,710 posts)... you may be right, but I don't see it. Right now they are objecting to not being given 30 days notice under CA state rules and or laws. I don't see the SCOTUS getting involved in state legislative rules. I would think that o get to the SCOTUS they would have to sue raising some other objection.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,207 posts)said reactions when I said the SCOTUS would grant Trump immunity. And yet, here we are.
reACTIONary
(6,710 posts)That was a made for SCOTUS issue that was going straight to the SCOTUS from the git-go. There was never any question that they would have to decide the issue, just what and how they would rule. I don't think the analogy holds. But we will see.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,207 posts)SCOTUS no longer even pretend to care about the Constitution, stare decisis, the law, or justice. The court is openly corrupt, and ideologically motivated. It has a White/Christian nationalist agenda it is going to see enacted. We can keep pretending this isn't so, or that former norms and checks are in place, but they are not. SCOTUS either rules directly for Trump, or stalls/defers rulings to Trump's benefit.
We are a de facto dictatorship. Procedures, jurisdiction, laws and processes are no longer followed. This administration does whatever it pleases with very little consequence.
This whole issue will be litigated all the way up to the election, will then be used to cause chaos during the election, and then pushed to SCOTUS after the election as an "urgent" matter. The six wholly owned justices will then rule in whatever manner gives MAGA the win.
I have been warning about this since Bush v. Gore.
reACTIONary
(6,710 posts)... we will see what happens.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,207 posts)But I fear that they are not going to give up power peacefully.
Quanto Magnus
(1,256 posts)if it's done by both sides.... Ask them if they are for what Texas and other red states are about to do.
How about those California Republicans talk to their pals in Texas and other red states to get them to stop their power grab? No? Then sit down and STFU.
LetMyPeopleVote
(169,852 posts)Democratic lawyers and affiliates are gearing up to sue if or when the new redistricting maps are signed by Abbott. This is in additon to the ongoing redistricting case that will be amended to included the new map
Link to tweet
Democratic-aligned nonprofit, civil rights groups ready to sue over Texas congressional map
— Today headline (@todayheadline.bsky.social) 2025-08-19T05:24:33Z
Several Democratic-aligned and civil rights groups are readying to sue over a proposed set of new congressional lines in Texas as lawmakers in the Lone Star State look to advance a GOP-friendly map ahead ofâ¦
Several groups including the National Redistricting Foundation, the National Democratic Redistricting Committees nonprofit arm; the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF); and the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) filed a motion Monday asking a federal court in Texas to set aside time for a hearing once the groups file a preliminary injunction that looks to block the Texas House map from taking effect.
The filing also asks the court to vacate, as to the state legislative challenges, its August 11, 2025, order suspending the deadline for submitting proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The map is egregiously unconstitutional, and its implementation must be immediately enjoined, the filing said. Plaintiffs intend to expeditiously supplement their complaints and move for a preliminary injunction on account of the new maps blatant constitutional violations......
Should Governor Abbott sign the new gerrymander into law, the NRF will quickly challenge that map in federal court, and the court must be prepared to act swiftly to intervene and protect the rights of Texans, she added.
orangecrush
(26,717 posts)