General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWatching Katy Tur......
and she asked a Justice Scalia associate about taking back our constitution?
He said that Scalia would have loved it and wanted it that way!
Umm, Scalia was one of the judges that put us in the situation with all his rulings ways.
Give me a break!
Ocelot II
(131,892 posts)City Lights
(26,187 posts)These two numbnuts are using the Constitution for toilet paper. They are the absolute worst.
Peppertoo
(444 posts)hlthe2b
(115,273 posts)In reality, he probably was on some issues--by comparison. Obviously not on a lot of major issues that has sent us down this path. Still, he did attempt to argue the law and constitution. Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch (often) just argue ideology and try to make the law "fit" (or ignore it completely).
But, damn if I wouldn't sub Scalia in for any of those horrible cretins.
Deuxcents
(28,335 posts)Management keeps her but lets go of Katie Phang, Alex Wagner, Mehdi Hasan, Joy Reid and others more qualified than Ms Tur.
Polly Hennessey
(9,066 posts)imanamerican63
(16,550 posts)It is the first time in several months that I watched any of her show. But they were talking about todays rulings.
creeksneakers2
(8,090 posts)yorkster
(4,006 posts)He clerked for Scalia, if I got that correctly.
I caught a bit of that exchange.
Before I saw his name and association with Scalia, I said to my husband, "Who the hell is that?". We often go to the BBC during KT time slot.
creeksneakers2
(8,090 posts)creeksneakers2
(8,090 posts)I found it. It was a discussion about the public taking over deciding what is in the Constitution and what should be in it.
MakeThemCry
(43 posts)It's too corporate.
I don't know how you guys do it.
orleans
(37,507 posts)Stacey Grove
(176 posts)of the billionaire ruling class.
There's a host of presuppositions and assumptions that will never be addressed or questioned on corporate news.