General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe War of Capital -- The American Prospect
https://prospect.org/2026/06/26/war-of-capital-spacex-ipo/Zachary Groz
Asset managers, private investment firms, and institutional investors like pension funds have divergent interests, though as the SpaceX IPO reveals, the money power acts in concert.
The company's initial public offering (IPO), which is now the biggest in history, has managed to spook almost everyone orbiting around it. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has warned it "may threaten the integrity and stability of our capital markets" and cements the "most rigged corporate structure in history."
The Council of Institutional Investors (CII), a trade group representing dozens of retirement funds, endowments, and money managers, seems to agree with that assessment. The group has balked at SpaceX's two-class shareholder voting structure, which leaves Musk in total control of corporate board appointments, and at the offering's fairly overt suggestion that the board expects huge conflicts of interest to arise in the future, which it doesn't intend to police. CII also has highlighted a provision requiring shareholders to take practically all disputes to a single, newly created specialty court in Texas, where Musk can expect a huge home-field advantage. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R), a key Musk ally, handpicks its judges, who, subject to approval by the state legislature, serve two-year terms and can be reappointed in perpetuity.
Taken together, the structure of the offering may pave the way soon enough for a merger of SpaceX and Tesla, which at least one Musk acolyte is saying could birth the first $100 trillion company. (Combined today, the new entity's market cap would miss that mark by about $96 trillion, though it would still approach Nvidia, Apple, and Google parent Alphabet as the highest-valued company in the world.)
. . .
yankee87
(2,892 posts)This has ripped the scab off any doubt that the stock market is nothing but a Ponzi scheme anymore. If youre not an insider, youre getting stuck with the losses, while the 1% do a pump and dump.
Kid Berwyn
(25,503 posts)In the case of capitalism, the Bank.
erronis
(24,964 posts)And sometimes are the same ones making the decisions that move the markets.
Kid Berwyn
(25,503 posts)One of the things that is interesting about reading conspiracy theory is that much of what folks think is conspiracy is really many people acting in concert to make or protect their money. ― Catherine Austin Fitts
Lucy Komisar shed light a decade or so back on the offshoring
The Criminal Services Industry
Excerpt
While tax dodges are probably as old as taxes themselves, modern offshore tax havens date from the 1920s and 30s when Bermuda and Liechtenstein passed laws for offshore companies and trusts. After World War 1, many European countries raised taxes to rebuild their shattered countries and money soon flowed into low-tax countries like Switzerland which had suffered no war damage. Many countries eventually found the advantages of low taxes in attracting money or businesses to their banks. Secrecy laws also helped especially in small countries which found that the fees for such services could prop up their economies.
Today, England, the US and some European countries are replacing the more exotic Caribbean or Indian Ocean Islands as the tax havens of choice. On the Tax Secrecy index, the US state of Delaware is listed as the No. 1 offender by the Tax Justice Network. Delaware earns $700 million per year in company registration fees, a significant part of its budget.
Source: https://www.occrp.org/en/project/offshore-crime-inc/crime-goes-offshore