Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Remember in 16 when we were told the Supreme Court wasn't important (Original Post) SocialDemocrat61 Yesterday OP
Meanwhile D_Master81 Yesterday #1
A certain individual who loudly SocialDemocrat61 Yesterday #2
Even today, his utterances are taken by some to be supplemental Commandments. DFW Yesterday #5
FYI The person I'm refering to is SocialDemocrat61 23 hrs ago #10
My bad. I was thinking of someone else. DFW 21 hrs ago #11
No way. I cannot imagine that. betsuni 20 hrs ago #17
OK, I must have misunderstood one of the inserts DFW 20 hrs ago #18
I saw someone interviewed on a podcast praising Trump because he told people the system is broken, betsuni 19 hrs ago #20
1.) The Curse of the Internet: The Stupidities of Total Strangers, The Likes of Whom.... ColoringFool 18 hrs ago #24
Dude has bought his own bullshit FHRRK1 18 hrs ago #23
I change channels or mute the tv when this asshole is on LetMyPeopleVote 16 hrs ago #33
Who? tblue37 14 hrs ago #34
This guy SocialDemocrat61 14 hrs ago #35
That has been the main problem since the 70's Jokerman Yesterday #6
It was the purity police FalloutShelter Yesterday #3
I have no idea of which you speak and to what you refer....... ColoringFool 18 hrs ago #22
During the Bush- Gore election FalloutShelter 18 hrs ago #25
And isn't it interesting that they require purity for certain Democrats mcar 17 hrs ago #28
A glaring example of how the double standard harms us dlk Yesterday #4
I still fume remembering Sarandon boasting that she "didn't vote with her vagina"... QueerDuck 23 hrs ago #7
I was called a vagina voter right here mcar 17 hrs ago #29
I'm not surprised. I'm disappointed... but not surprised. QueerDuck 17 hrs ago #31
It was an ugly time mcar 17 hrs ago #32
You weren't told that by me, I guarantee. MineralMan 23 hrs ago #8
I never thought so! SocialDemocrat61 23 hrs ago #9
Isn't she the "bowl of shit" person? Just_Vote_Dem 21 hrs ago #12
I think that might be SocialDemocrat61 21 hrs ago #13
Whoops Just_Vote_Dem 21 hrs ago #14
Thank you SocialDemocrat61 21 hrs ago #15
No, I don't remember that at all. BlueTsunami2018 21 hrs ago #16
GOP controlled SCOTUS started this nightmare in 2000 DemocracyForever 19 hrs ago #19
No. No, I Don't. Why Would A Democrat Ever Think This? ColoringFool 18 hrs ago #21
In '16 the "Hillary is a warmonger" crowd said this mcar 17 hrs ago #30
Hillary was right-The Supreme Court was on the ballot in 2016 LetMyPeopleVote 17 hrs ago #26
Can't fix stupid fujiyamasan 17 hrs ago #27

D_Master81

(2,753 posts)
1. Meanwhile
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 07:20 AM
Yesterday

It was why a lot of RW people came around to voting for Trump that year even though they didn’t like him in the primary. Trust me as I live around and know a lot of RWers.

SocialDemocrat61

(8,395 posts)
2. A certain individual who loudly
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 07:25 AM
Yesterday

advocated against voting for Hillary Clinton in 16 was on TV yesterday condemning the latest SC decisions. I really wished the interviewer had pointed out that they helped make them happen.

DFW

(60,822 posts)
5. Even today, his utterances are taken by some to be supplemental Commandments.
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 08:27 AM
Yesterday

I fiund his action ten years ago to be detrimental to Hillary’s candidacy, and was terrified most of all what it might mean for the Supreme Court if she were to lose. Of course no one in the summer of 2016 thought she would lose—with one major exception: my wife, who isn’t even American.

She saw TV screens in airports, etc., showing nothing but anti-Hillary speeches 24/7 (almost exclusively CNN, no Fox), and she said then: “you Americans might be in for a big, ugly surprise. Your media is burying Hilary and giving their airtime to her opponents. She is in trouble and none of you realize it.”

DFW

(60,822 posts)
11. My bad. I was thinking of someone else.
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 12:34 PM
21 hrs ago

Ironically, the one I was thinking of probably ultimately DID vote for Hillary. I would hope, anyway.

betsuni

(29,443 posts)
17. No way. I cannot imagine that.
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 01:48 PM
20 hrs ago

A journalist tells a story about interviewing someone shortly before they announced running for president. She realizes the candidate didn't know how to get what they talked about done and quickly became irritable and brusque when asked for more details. The journalist had been told that this person doesn't know anything. She agreed with that assessment. (The journalist was terribly harassed online for her reporting that year to the point of real fear -- which we are assured was all in our imagination.)

The Revolution Nonesuch song and dance show is still playing.

DFW

(60,822 posts)
18. OK, I must have misunderstood one of the inserts
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 01:53 PM
20 hrs ago

Same person after all. That description is hard to misread!

betsuni

(29,443 posts)
20. I saw someone interviewed on a podcast praising Trump because he told people the system is broken,
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 02:21 PM
19 hrs ago

that's why he won, whereas Democrats are out-of-touch and too busy partying with donors, enjoying fancy cocktails and horse d'erves. One guess as to who broke America.

I get a headache even thinking about it. Then I come here and see post after post trying to make us scared of a few Democratic centrists. Ooooooh, centrists. How terrifying.

ColoringFool

(1,385 posts)
24. 1.) The Curse of the Internet: The Stupidities of Total Strangers, The Likes of Whom....
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 03:29 PM
18 hrs ago

We were blissfully unaware pre-computers. WTH CARES what some jerk in Boondoggle, Alabama, thinks?!

2.) Nobody is "afraid" of Centrist Democrats, at least, not if they're like me: dismayed; disappointed; disdainful. No guts, no glory. No D-Day. No New Deal. No NASA. No Medicare.

Why did the chicken cross the road? So as not to get run over in the middle of it.

Jokerman

(3,561 posts)
6. That has been the main problem since the 70's
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 08:38 AM
Yesterday

The number of people I know and have crossed paths with who are strict republicans because they are anti choice is staggering.

I'm not saying we should give up on women's rights, hell no, we should double down on equal rights and quit pandering to people who will never support us.

FalloutShelter

(14,748 posts)
3. It was the purity police
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 07:34 AM
Yesterday

That argued against the importance of the court with both the election of Hillary and also with Al Gore.
The “We want something that is not on the menu crowd” brought us here.

They are setting up the pins to do it again.
Party unity is more important than ever before because the house is on fire.
We can argue about the color of the curtains later.

Vote D

ColoringFool

(1,385 posts)
22. I have no idea of which you speak and to what you refer.......
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 03:22 PM
18 hrs ago

HOW COULD ANY DEMOCRAT ARGUE "AGAINST THE IMPORTANCE OF THE COURT" REGARDING AL GORE, CONSIDERING THE 2000 SCOTUS DECISION FOR BUSH?!

Unless you refer to irrelevancies as Sarandon and non-Democrats as Nader, neither of whom loom in any manner any more.

FalloutShelter

(14,748 posts)
25. During the Bush- Gore election
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 03:46 PM
18 hrs ago

MANY of my liberal friends did not want to vote for Gore and did not… even after many arguments for the court. SAME SHIT with the “I just don’t like her” crowd and Hillary.

We self sabotaged both times because of the “I want something else” crowd.

the SCOTUS was not enough reason.

Has the party learned that lesson?
Party unity is the number one consideration in a Presidential election. You can’t win without it. That is my point.

mcar

(46,555 posts)
28. And isn't it interesting that they require purity for certain Democrats
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 04:12 PM
17 hrs ago

but for other, not so much.

dlk

(13,446 posts)
4. A glaring example of how the double standard harms us
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 07:55 AM
Yesterday

Women candidates are routinely judged much more harshly than men.

QueerDuck

(2,153 posts)
7. I still fume remembering Sarandon boasting that she "didn't vote with her vagina"...
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 10:14 AM
23 hrs ago

... because she truly believed the Supreme Court didn't matter. What a cozy, catastrophic ivory tower she lives in while millions of women pay the price for her smug purity test.

mcar

(46,555 posts)
32. It was an ugly time
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 04:33 PM
17 hrs ago

Thankfully, the main perpetrators were shown the door by Admin, especially after they were told they couldn't refer to HRC as the "c" word.

Just_Vote_Dem

(3,736 posts)
14. Whoops
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 12:50 PM
21 hrs ago

Well, two peas in a pod as far as I'm concerned.
Thanks for the correction
By the way, I really enjoy your posts, thanks for everything

BlueTsunami2018

(5,143 posts)
16. No, I don't remember that at all.
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 12:53 PM
21 hrs ago

In fact, much of the prevailing argument was that even you didn’t like her, the Supreme Court was of paramount importance so hold your nose and vote for her.

DemocracyForever

(324 posts)
19. GOP controlled SCOTUS started this nightmare in 2000
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 01:54 PM
19 hrs ago

The GOP controlled SCOTUS started this nightmare in 2000 with their anti-democracy, unconstitutional coup known as the Bush vs Gore ruling. This is why our country suffers so terribly today. Anyone who ignores this ugly truth is living in an alternate universe.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Remember in 16 when we we...