Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CNN: the Popularity of Socialism (Original Post) applegrove Thursday OP
article at link does not define what they mean by socialism. lotta hot air there nt msongs Thursday #1
Here is Heather Cox Richardson take on it all and the fight applegrove Yesterday #3
Others here have made a similar point hurl Thursday #2
I, too see the fearmongering as overblown DFW Yesterday #4

applegrove

(133,781 posts)
3. Here is Heather Cox Richardson take on it all and the fight
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 02:47 AM
Yesterday

within the Democratic Party. It is heartwarming. Watch to the end.


https://www.democraticunderground.com/13244667

hurl

(1,071 posts)
2. Others here have made a similar point
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 10:44 PM
Thursday

I think the negativity of the socialist label is losing its sting. It has pretty much become just a boomer scare-word, with its roots back to cold-war years. A quickly dwindling population even gets that connection.

Will Republicans use it to rile their ancient base? Of course, but they were going to do that anyway. Their base from that era is shrinking daily.

With the right's very obvious over-reach, I think the time may be right to see if we can turn their fearmongering of socialism into an eye-roll meme and maybe start to rehabilitate the term.

DFW

(60,822 posts)
4. I, too see the fearmongering as overblown
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 04:49 AM
Yesterday

But the Republicans call everything that they oppose “socialism.” Most of them don’t even know what it means, just like so many political clichés are not understood by those who use them in their daily repertoire, like liberal, conservative, corporate, and so on.

I visited enough countries that proudly called themselves “socialist” to still consider it a nasty sting, indeed. East Germany in 1974 (as a tourist), Cuba in 1982 (at the invitation of their government), post-Soviet socialist Russia, post National Socialist Germany, and “SINO” (socialist in name only) Yugoslavia several times before it broke up. I had several friends trying to tough it out in the socialist Venezuela of Chávez and Maduro.

I don’t care what the term refers means theoretically. Some black inner city dude has surely heard “with liberty and justice for all,” too. Those terms don’t mean crap if some racist white cop arrests him for something he didn’t do, lies in court to get a conviction, and sends him to jail for 18 months.

That’s the reality of socialism, too. Reality is that an elite is quickly formed at the top, control is paranoid and reinforced by a secret police. The “German Democratic Republic,” by their own definition the “true existing socialism,” needed the death strip and self-automated machine guns to keep its own people inside its socialist paradise. Again, Unamuno’s “Ustedes vencerán pero no convencerán.” I have seen the sting, been in countries that have felt the sting. They were not places you would want to move to or live in. I speak German, Spanish and Russian. I talked with people on the ground. The theories might sound great. They don’t work when implemented by people. At least, they haven’t yet, and I’m not willing to risk a bet on someone who says, “but THIS time, we really mean it!” Been there, seen that. No, they don’t mean it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CNN: the Popularity of So...