Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

red dog 1

(33,592 posts)
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 07:31 PM 6 hrs ago

"There is no word to adequately describe the anger, frustration, & disbelief that Americans are feeling.."

There is no word in the English language to adequately describe the anger and frustration and disbelief that Americans are feeling….

Katherine (@wordwatcher.bsky.social) 2026-06-05T14:58:24.598Z
49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"There is no word to adequately describe the anger, frustration, & disbelief that Americans are feeling.." (Original Post) red dog 1 6 hrs ago OP
my same words... markie 6 hrs ago #1
We used to have.people in office who, despite their flaws, wnylib 4 hrs ago #16
I believe that the founders believed the judiciary would remain independent DFW 1 hr ago #44
Ghandi is often cited as a peaceful protestor with peace being how he attained his goals. However, supporters in2herbs 6 hrs ago #2
No Dorian Gray 4 hrs ago #10
Well, let's hope the Congress that convenes after the midterms has one. Otherwise, PatrickforB 3 hrs ago #26
I'm with you. Joinfortmill 3 hrs ago #30
Word! yellow dahlia 3 hrs ago #33
Our founding fathers never believed bob4460 6 hrs ago #3
I'm sure the Founding Fathers never considered the possibility that so many elected officials FakeNoose 5 hrs ago #6
The founders believed that Congressmen would zealously safeguard their own power. Intractable 5 hrs ago #7
No, they sold it. Traitors! For the love of money! Sweet Rosie Red 3 hrs ago #24
Who would believe this? yellow dahlia 3 hrs ago #34
What is the flaw in the constitution? Disaffected 5 hrs ago #4
Yes PatSeg 4 hrs ago #14
FOX NEWS, RINSE, REPEAT. Joinfortmill 3 hrs ago #31
There are fundamental flaws in the constitution Mysterian 3 hrs ago #38
Yeah, I would agree that the electoral college is an anachronism Disaffected 32 min ago #46
The GOP should homegirl 4 hrs ago #21
The Constitution gives us two ways to remove a president..impeachment and the 25th amendment but.. Deuxcents 5 hrs ago #5
This malaise 5 hrs ago #8
Citizens United created this catastrophe Ponietz 4 hrs ago #9
I think that needs to be the first of several ammendments. Gore1FL 4 hrs ago #13
Yes, that was arguably one of the worst, Disaffected 28 min ago #47
Add 4 more justices--make it 13!! Dems should run on it!! (Even if it's hard to do) ! Ars Longa 4 hrs ago #11
The constitution isn't the problem. It's a assheads interpreting it. n/t SpankMe 4 hrs ago #12
Or ignoring it PatSeg 4 hrs ago #20
Rage stage left 4 hrs ago #15
It's not The Constitution, it is a spineless Republican Congress and a corrupt LoisB 4 hrs ago #17
It's the Constitution Cirsium 14 min ago #49
The 4 states Cirsium 4 hrs ago #18
And these 4 states contribute little to the national economy Blue Owl 37 min ago #45
Understood Cirsium 15 min ago #48
Kick dalton99a 4 hrs ago #19
It's you'll Republican... richdj25 4 hrs ago #22
Corrupt conservative reprehensible republicans. Festivito 4 hrs ago #23
"A nation that will not enforce its laws has no claim to the respect and allegiance of its people." progressoid 3 hrs ago #25
That's a signature line to keep Ponietz 2 hrs ago #42
Amen to that Joinfortmill 3 hrs ago #27
the CRAZY part Skittles 3 hrs ago #28
Sounds like me. OAITW r.2.0 3 hrs ago #29
Me, too. hamsterjill 3 hrs ago #35
Should have been more checks put in place the first time he was elected!!! We dropped the ball!!!! Pisces 3 hrs ago #32
Spectacular own goals for the history books Ponietz 2 hrs ago #43
The English language to the rescue. hay rick 3 hrs ago #36
So True, no matter how hard Cha 3 hrs ago #37
What would have stopped him from becoming President the first time? Jedi Guy 2 hrs ago #39
A better press might have done it. Morbius 2 hrs ago #40
Maybe, I guess. Jedi Guy 2 hrs ago #41

markie

(24,086 posts)
1. my same words...
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 07:49 PM
6 hrs ago

there is something wrong with our Constitution if someone like this can become (and stay) president!!!

wnylib

(26,637 posts)
16. We used to have.people in office who, despite their flaws,
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 09:45 PM
4 hrs ago

at least accepted the Constitution and their vow of office. For 250 years we had leaders who did not try to overthrow it completely, evem though some of them violated parts of it.

The founders feared that a despot could gain the support and trust of the people so they tried to put safeguards in the gov't system. But safeguards don't work when a leader is determined to destroy the system and gains power over both the Congress and SC.

I don't think there is much more the founders could hsve done to prevent a Donald Trump type from tearing it all down.

But there are things we can do to bring him down and restore the nation.

DFW

(60,557 posts)
44. I believe that the founders believed the judiciary would remain independent
Sat Jun 6, 2026, 12:47 AM
1 hr ago

A Supreme Court that does the bidding of the executive was never envisioned, because its constitutionally granted independence was designed to prevent that.

in2herbs

(4,611 posts)
2. Ghandi is often cited as a peaceful protestor with peace being how he attained his goals. However, supporters
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 08:00 PM
6 hrs ago

of Ghandi's vision were not always peaceful. It was their physical fighting on behalf of Ghandi's belief in peace that brought that revolution to an end.

Does our democracy require a revolution to bring about peace?

PatrickforB

(15,549 posts)
26. Well, let's hope the Congress that convenes after the midterms has one. Otherwise,
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 10:29 PM
3 hrs ago

and quite unfortunately, revolution may happen. We must remember that any government governs at the SUFFRANCE of the people, and since about 1995, I have noticed that Congress doesn't seem to care at all about what Americans actually want. They are more in tune with pleasing their donors.

Honestly, I'm so fucking sick of being told how people are going to fight for me while this shit stays the same. Trump is a symptom of the class war that has been successfully waged by the robber barons since 1935. They have played the long game, and now we have that Heritage Foundation asshole who is saying the revolution will be bloodless if the left lets it be.

Fuck all those assholes. People are fucking ANGRY. They are. And I'm not thinking the establishment of our party understands that at a visceral level. But I'm seeing 1789 and guillotine memes more frequently now, and people are talking about revolution.

I'm too old for this shit, nearly 70, so I don't want any part of that. So yeah, let's hope the new Congress has a fucking spine. They need to raise taxes on corporations and billionaires, get rid of Citizens United, change the rules of corporate governance to hold workers, consumers and the environment EQUAL in weight to profits, and give us Medicare for all Americans. Also bolster Social Security so it stays solvent. It is a SACRED TRUST and I've paid into both for the 40 years I've worked. Do those things and Dems would likely never lose another election for decades.

bob4460

(406 posts)
3. Our founding fathers never believed
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 08:06 PM
6 hrs ago

That there would be enough members of Congress that would let a president break the laws so blatantly.

FakeNoose

(42,693 posts)
6. I'm sure the Founding Fathers never considered the possibility that so many elected officials
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 08:52 PM
5 hrs ago

... would be so completely CORRUPT. Back in the late 1700's and early 1800's, things were pretty straight-forward. If you committed treason, or if you were disloyal for any reason, you got hanged or you were shot by a firing squad. The conversation is over.

Intractable

(2,456 posts)
7. The founders believed that Congressmen would zealously safeguard their own power.
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 08:54 PM
5 hrs ago

The current Republican Congress has given it all away.

Disaffected

(6,631 posts)
4. What is the flaw in the constitution?
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 08:32 PM
5 hrs ago

Trump can be impeached and removed in short order if Congress so wishes. But, Congress doesn't so here we are.

It's hard to legislate honesty and morality - it depends on the elected reps and as the old adage goes, we deserve the government we elect.

PatSeg

(53,756 posts)
14. Yes
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 09:37 PM
4 hrs ago

The flaws don't necessarily lie in the constitution, a brilliant document, but the founders could not have anticipated such widespread corruption and dishonesty. I know I couldn't have.

There have been plenty of republican politicians that I have strongly disagreed with as regards policy, but many of them really believed in our constitution and wouldn't have gone along with such in-your-face disregard for our traditions and institutions.

The founders created a remarkable democracy that has been the envy of the free world over the years, but there are 21st century flaws among our voters, the media, and politics that they couldn't have expected. I don't know if we've jumped the shark yet, but I dread reaching a point of no return.

Mysterian

(6,681 posts)
38. There are fundamental flaws in the constitution
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 11:08 PM
3 hrs ago

The electoral college and the undemocratic apportionment of senators are two major flaws that have allowed the takeover by a corrupt minority and the very possible end of the republic after 250 years. Jimmy Carter hit the nail on the head when he said the USA is a plutocracy.
The founders compromised a bit too much but they made something that lasted for a couple centuries.

Disaffected

(6,631 posts)
46. Yeah, I would agree that the electoral college is an anachronism
Sat Jun 6, 2026, 01:37 AM
32 min ago

and the Presidential Pardon (is it in the Constitution?) is open to great abuse as we have amply witnessed.

Impeachment is still there however and should be but corruption does override it alright........

homegirl

(2,013 posts)
21. The GOP should
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 09:52 PM
4 hrs ago

impeach DJT immediately. After November mid terms the Democrats will be in charge, the first order of business will be impeachment. Trump and Vance gone, and the Speaker of the House moves into the Oval Office. And appoints a V.P.

Nixon was a party man, Trump is NOT! Nixon resigned and his V.P became POTUS. NOT THE DEMOCRAT WHO WAS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE!

Deuxcents

(27,896 posts)
5. The Constitution gives us two ways to remove a president..impeachment and the 25th amendment but..
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 08:34 PM
5 hrs ago

It’s congress that is the roadblock in this case. Gonna have to change that this election cycle

Ponietz

(4,490 posts)
9. Citizens United created this catastrophe
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 09:17 PM
4 hrs ago

I think the simplest, most effective solution would be a 28th Amendment stating corporations are not people and money is not speech.

There’s our revolution in one sentence.

Gore1FL

(22,994 posts)
13. I think that needs to be the first of several ammendments.
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 09:32 PM
4 hrs ago

I don't have specific ideas on how to fix impeachment and removal through the 25th amendment, but those need fixing with one.

We need another to put better requirements for presidents, and perhaps, all elected federal offices, from financial transparency to competency tests.

Follow that up with one judicial term limits.

I am sure we could come up with more; yours should be first.

Disaffected

(6,631 posts)
47. Yes, that was arguably one of the worst,
Sat Jun 6, 2026, 01:41 AM
28 min ago

and the most consequential, court decisions of the modern era.

PatSeg

(53,756 posts)
20. Or ignoring it
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 09:49 PM
4 hrs ago

like so many do. So much for all those republican members of congress who used to pull out their pocket sized copy of the constitution for the camera. Now it is just an annoying piece of paper that they may pay lip service to, while actually ignoring it in word or intention.

I'm sure there are many who don't even know what is in it, well aside from the 2nd amendment which they selectively use for their own political benefit. Hey, a lot of MAGA voters only care about the 2nd amendment They don't know or understand the rest of the constitution.

LoisB

(13,641 posts)
17. It's not The Constitution, it is a spineless Republican Congress and a corrupt
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 09:47 PM
4 hrs ago

and/or compliant Supreme Court that is the problem.

Cirsium

(4,163 posts)
18. The 4 states
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 09:48 PM
4 hrs ago

The 4 states where he still has an above water approval rating control 8% of the Senate, yet only have .01% of the US population. This is democracy? They have 800 times the power they should have in a truly representative democracy. (ID, WY, ND, WV)

Blue Owl

(59,772 posts)
45. And these 4 states contribute little to the national economy
Sat Jun 6, 2026, 01:32 AM
37 min ago

While sucking off the blue states economic contributions like thirsty hogs on a hind titty.

Cut ‘em off, says I…

Cirsium

(4,163 posts)
48. Understood
Sat Jun 6, 2026, 01:54 AM
15 min ago

But there are children and Democrats there. The problem is the system that gives a relative handful of people disproportionate power.

richdj25

(229 posts)
22. It's you'll Republican...
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 09:52 PM
4 hrs ago

Party, not just the one individual who is leading this chaos. Think about it, the GOP has been slowly building up to this moment in time, as a matter of protecting what power they have left. This is the same party that told Nixon he had to go.

Best hope the public is up to doing something about Trump and the Republicans. Otherwise, the climax to all this is going to do some serious damage.....across the board.

Festivito

(13,935 posts)
23. Corrupt conservative reprehensible republicans.
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 09:55 PM
4 hrs ago

As people, they have accepted their bribes to not do anything to stop what is happening. And that goes for the republican appointed supreme court justices.

They fully intend to continue accepting their bribes. The main stream media will also continue to accept their bribes.

Voters continue to be confused about what is true or not, what is important or not. If they go out to the streets, they're made to be a joke.

progressoid

(53,419 posts)
25. "A nation that will not enforce its laws has no claim to the respect and allegiance of its people."
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 10:23 PM
3 hrs ago

"A nation that will not enforce its laws has no claim to the respect and allegiance of its people."
-- -- Ambrose Bierce

Skittles

(173,316 posts)
28. the CRAZY part
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 10:33 PM
3 hrs ago

occurred when a mutli-felon rapist seditionist con man POS who couldn't pass the background check required for ANY other job was allowed to run for PRESIDENT

hamsterjill

(17,864 posts)
35. Me, too.
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 11:02 PM
3 hrs ago

Describes me perfectly. Someone else mentioned "rage" and I'd add that, too. I think anyone with a brain is going to be feeling something.

Pisces

(6,348 posts)
32. Should have been more checks put in place the first time he was elected!!! We dropped the ball!!!!
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 10:39 PM
3 hrs ago

hay rick

(9,756 posts)
36. The English language to the rescue.
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 11:05 PM
3 hrs ago

The English language includes the words "treason" and "treasonous." The media needs to use those words to describe what we all see, and the public needs to wake up, take responsibility, and end treasonous practices, treasonous complicity, and the freedom of traitors to betray their fellow countrymen. Corrupted and complicit institutions needs to cooperate or be bulldozed.

Jedi Guy

(3,514 posts)
39. What would have stopped him from becoming President the first time?
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 11:23 PM
2 hrs ago

Nothing, really. He was (and remains) a shitty human being but you can't put a clause into the Constitution to stop a shitty person from being elected to the Presidency.

The Framers could have written in a clause that someone with a criminal conviction is disqualified from running for President and it would have kept his second term from happening. I don't think they ever foresaw a shitbag like Trump running for office, though.

What kind of Constitutional amendment would fix a situation like this? Recall elections? Get ready for those to happen with the same regularity as the midterms. There's already a mechanism for Congress to remove a President and it's extremely difficult for a damn good reason.

I really can't think of anything offhand. The "I don't care what Constitutional law experts say" bit at the very beginning of the tweet tells me that whoever posted it isn't looking for rational discussion, though. You can ignore reality all you want but it isn't just going to go away.

Morbius

(1,169 posts)
40. A better press might have done it.
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 11:30 PM
2 hrs ago

Too many people choose news filters that omit whatever news they don't want to hear. If American media in 2016 was the equal of American media in 1974, this country doesn't elect a Trump.

Not that I have an answer to the problem, though.

Jedi Guy

(3,514 posts)
41. Maybe, I guess.
Fri Jun 5, 2026, 11:40 PM
2 hrs ago

I feel like the American electorates of 1974 and 2016 are very different animals, though. Some things are still going to be the same, like the kitchen table issues, but it was a different world and a different time. Sadly a shitbag like Trump can find fertile ground much more easily than we like to think.

The media back then was a totally different landscape. Everyone was, for the most part, presented with more or less the same facts and might interpret them differently but there was still a shared reality. These days the media ecosystem is a chaotic mess of echo chambers and outright bullshit, you're certainly correct about that.

1974 was before my time but I feel like back in the Before Times the left and the right both genuinely wanted the best for America and disagreed on how to get to the desired endpoint.

Now the left and the right are working from totally different blueprints and the desired endpoints are wildly different and don't bear any resemblance to each other.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"There is no word to adeq...