General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDavid Hogg takes his war on Dem establishment to California
SACRAMENTO, California David Hogg is turning California into the front line of his war on the Democratic Party establishment.
Hogg, the former Democratic National Committee vice chair who roiled the DNC last year with his pledge to take down ineffective, asleep-at-the-wheel Democrats, has steered some $2.6 million into primaries across the country this cycle through his group Leaders We Deserve. About a third of that has come in California, where the 26-year-old activist is spending heavily to boost insurgent candidates in some of the partys most consequential House races. And once again, it is putting Hogg on a collision course with Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and other party power centers.
In the run-up to Tuesdays primary, Leaders We Deserve has poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into supporting progressive challengers taking on vulnerable Reps. David Valadao and Kevin Kiley. His organization is backing 81-year-old Democratic Rep. Doris Matsuis first serious challenger in a generation.
Its a test of whether younger, more progressive candidates can win in the California districts Democrats now need after the Supreme Courts Voting Rights Act ruling unleashed a new round of red-state redistricting. The question is most immediate in Valadaos Central Valley seat, still widely considered a toss-up despite the gerrymander. Party leaders are betting on more conventional candidates, but Hogg argues that approach has already failed.
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/01/david-hogg-takes-his-war-on-dem-establishment-to-california-00944712
Bluetus
(3,160 posts)People have extremely low opinions of BOTH party establishments. I don't know why anybody would listen to the people who have an 80% unpopularity (Congressional Democrats). The fact that Republicans are even less popular doesn't really help very much. We need to be getting on the side where the public is.
Bobstandard
(2,397 posts)Unless you can cite a reliable source with anything near this poor a favorability rating, I call this Dem bashing.
Bluetus
(3,160 posts)Is Gallup good enough for you? If you want to say it is more like 75% unfavorable, that's OK with me. The point remains. Why would anybody listen to the people whom 3/4 of the public thinks are doing an unfavorable. That's not bashing. That's just reality. Denial gets us nowhere.
There are many other polls that say people have a higher opinion of THEIR representative. Be that as it may, being 75% or 86% unfavorable means that something is fundamentally wrong. And personally, I am a lot more willing to listen to people like Graham Platner, David Hogg, AOC and others who are willing to talk in specifics about where we have lost our way.
Bottom line, being marginally more favorable than Republicans is not a real great position when neither party gets much above 25% favorable. Don't you think it would be smarter to change what we are doing for that a majority of Americans would have a favorable view?
And if you don't think so, should I accuse you of bashing Democrats like Hogg, Platner and AOC? Let's not threaten each other. Let's look for a more successful path forward.
Bobstandard
(2,397 posts)The Gallup poll looks at the approval of Congress. Thats different from approval of Democrats. I think you know that.
Bluetus
(3,160 posts)At this moment, Congressional Dems might be SLIGHTLY more favored than Republicans, but you won't find ANY poll from any reputable source that says more than 30% are happy with either party in Congress.
And that is the point. Why should we continue to be driven by people who only achieve 30% satisfaction -- or even 50% if we want to really disconnect from the real world?
If you had an engineer on staff whose designs failed 70% of the time, would you be asking that engineer for advice, or would you be looking for a better engineer?
I'm not bashing Dems, per se. I'm simply saying we should look for ones who can do better than 25% or 35%, and give them a chance to lead.
Bobstandard
(2,397 posts)Bluetus
(3,160 posts)Bluetus
(3,160 posts)"Twenty percent of voters approve of the way the Democrats in Congress are handling their job, while 72 percent disapprove, nearing the all-time low set in Quinnipiac University's December 2025 poll, when 18 percent of voters approved and 73 percent disapproved."
That's saying all Americans on average (including Republicans in the sample) give Dems in Congress 18% approval.
But take the Republicans and Independents out of it.
"... among Democrats, 41 percent approve of the way the Democrats in Congress are handling their job, while 50 percent disapprove."
That's a damning result. Now, to be sure, much of that is frustration from Trump's non-stop lawlessness. But evidently, the average Democrat thinks Democrats in Congress could be doing more to stop that, or at least provide a more effective opposition. Count me in that group. And remember, this started with the proposition that David Hogg is seeking to get more progressive, more active, more confrontational people elected. I humbly suggest that Hogg is more representative of what the average Democrat is feeling these days than anything we hear from Congressional leaders or the DNC. I just can't abide the status quo or "this too shall pass" thinking.
msongs
(74,314 posts)IMO. well that's fine but he used to complain about big money in poltics from what I recall
Response to RandySF (Original post)
SocialDemocrat61 This message was self-deleted by its author.