Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BigmanPigman

(55,542 posts)
Fri May 22, 2026, 01:13 AM 12 hrs ago

How influential was Susan Sarandon in the 2016 election?

Do you think her badmouthing Hillary was negative? Would Hillary have had a better outcome if Susan kept her personal opinions to herself instead of using her celerity platform to promote her own issues?

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How influential was Susan Sarandon in the 2016 election? (Original Post) BigmanPigman 12 hrs ago OP
insignificant but some people made themselves feel better by dumping on her nt msongs 12 hrs ago #1
That is absolutely not true. Sarandon Cha 11 hrs ago #8
Welp, she sure didn't help. sheshe2 10 hrs ago #13
According to a 2017 article in The Guardian, I'd say Sarandon was pretty anti-Hillary. George McGovern 11 hrs ago #2
She helped, as did Nina Turner, David Sirota, Briana Joy Gray, Cornell West, etc lostincalifornia 11 hrs ago #3
Sarandon is a dipshit bottomofthehill 11 hrs ago #4
Thank You for knowing that! Cha 11 hrs ago #9
Susan Sarandon: If 'Dangerous' Hillary Would've Won, 'We Would Be at War' sheshe2 11 hrs ago #5
Thanks, she! It's been documented that Stein Cha 11 hrs ago #11
Yes, correct, Cha. sheshe2 11 hrs ago #12
Yes, Sarandon was nasty to Delores Huerta Cha 10 hrs ago #14
Almost none at all Sympthsical 11 hrs ago #6
Non-issue nt canetoad 11 hrs ago #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Celerity 11 hrs ago #10
What is your point? Famous people by definition have influence to some degree..... ColoringFool 10 hrs ago #15
I was reading a current article about her BigmanPigman 10 hrs ago #16
Oh Snap. sheshe2 9 hrs ago #17
Bradly Whitford call her out on her LIES Cha 7 hrs ago #18
She didn't help SocialDemocrat61 5 hrs ago #19
"Always Bet on the Wrong Horse, My Life as an Activist Against Progress and Democracy," a memoir by Susan Sarandon. betsuni 5 hrs ago #20
She was not at all influential outside her own sphere of fame and activism ms liberty 4 hrs ago #21

Cha

(320,703 posts)
8. That is absolutely not true. Sarandon
Fri May 22, 2026, 01:57 AM
11 hrs ago

spewed all over the place that "Hillary is worse than trump" , Hillary would start a war", and "trump would bring the revolurion"

How did that fucking work out?

Not a good look to stick up for Sarandon.

George McGovern

(12,948 posts)
2. According to a 2017 article in The Guardian, I'd say Sarandon was pretty anti-Hillary.
Fri May 22, 2026, 01:31 AM
11 hrs ago

From the article:
"Did she really say that Hillary was more dangerous than Trump?"

'“Not exactly, but I don’t mind that quote,” (Sarandon) says. “I did think she was very, very dangerous. We would still be fracking, we would be at war [if she was president]. It wouldn’t be much smoother. Look what happened under Obama that we didn’t notice.'”
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/nov/26/susan-sarandon-i-thought-hillary-was-very-dangerous-if-shed-won-wed-be-at-war

Who can tell the influence of her opinions. Sarandon is known to be outspoken.
I'm sure she didn't do Hillary any good. And her ambiguous statement about President Obama is downright insulting to these Democratic ears.

Thanks for your post BigmanPigman. Food for thought.

lostincalifornia

(5,547 posts)
3. She helped, as did Nina Turner, David Sirota, Briana Joy Gray, Cornell West, etc
Fri May 22, 2026, 01:31 AM
11 hrs ago

Who not only refused to vote for Hillary. But encouraged others to do likewise.

and don’t forget Jill Stein comey, and the sexist anti-Hilary MSM.


In every critical swing state Hillary lost by less than 1% while Jill Stein received 1% of the vote in those critical swing states.

It didn’t take much.

bottomofthehill

(9,425 posts)
4. Sarandon is a dipshit
Fri May 22, 2026, 01:33 AM
11 hrs ago

And her attacks on Hillary clearly did not help. I wonder how that whole Jill Stein thing is working out for her.

sheshe2

(98,483 posts)
5. Susan Sarandon: If 'Dangerous' Hillary Would've Won, 'We Would Be at War'
Fri May 22, 2026, 01:48 AM
11 hrs ago
During the 2016 presidential election, Oscar-winning actress Susan Sarandon was a fervent Bernie Sanders supporter. And she really, really, REALLY disliked Hillary Clinton. Before Sanders lost the Democratic nomination to Clinton, Sarandon told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes that she didn’t think she could vote for Hillary in a two-person race with Donald Trump. She also told Hayes that “some people feel that Donald Trump will bring the revolution immediately, if he gets in.”

Following the election — Sarandon eventually supported and voted for Green candidate Jill Stein — the actress has taken quite a bit of heat from the center-left over her refusal to support Clinton and her insistence that a Trump presidency wouldn’t have been much worse than Hillary’s. In another interview with Hayes in February, she said Trump’selection made people more “awake” and involved. Meanwhile, in an April appearance on The Late Show, she echoed those sentiments, stating that people are more “energized” with him in office.

Well, a recent interview with The Guardian is sure to further raise the ire of moderates, Democrats and Clinton supporters. Why? Oh, just because Sarandon said that Clinton is extremely “dangerous” and would have led the country into war.

https://www.mediaite.com/online/susan-sarandon-if-dangerous-hillary-clinton-wouldve-won-we-would-be-at-war/

.......................................................

She is an asshole, why are we even talking about a woman that trashed our Democratic candidate and in the end voted for a Russian asset by the name of Jill Stein.

Here she is dining with Putin.

Cha

(320,703 posts)
11. Thanks, she! It's been documented that Stein
Fri May 22, 2026, 02:07 AM
11 hrs ago

was a Spoiler in the Swing states by Dav Wasserman. And she parrotted Sarandon.

sheshe2

(98,483 posts)
12. Yes, correct, Cha.
Fri May 22, 2026, 02:28 AM
11 hrs ago

Oh, and remember this?



Nevada Caucus Susan Sarandon gets in the face of Dolores Huerta President of the United Farm Workers. Sarandon is an outspoken supporter of Bernie Sanders. Dolores Huerta supports Hillary Clinton. She really wanted to drive the Monsanto GMO message thru but was it effective and the right way to do it?



I respect peoples passion for their candidates but there is a line between being a supporter and a fanatic. It is truly a frustrating en-devour sometimes to try and inform someone when you think you're right and the other person isn't. I think we have all felt that way at one point or another Even if you disagree with someones vote, you can't force your point of view/information on them. You can inform them of what you know or think you know and then they will have to decide if they want to process the information you provided. You may want to do a counterpoint to a response but to actively harass someone is crossing the line.


.................................................
What is she even doing in Nevada? Why is she at their caucus she doesn't live there!

Cha

(320,703 posts)
14. Yes, Sarandon was nasty to Delores Huerta
Fri May 22, 2026, 02:47 AM
10 hrs ago


Mahalo for knowing what actually happened.

Sympthsical

(11,124 posts)
6. Almost none at all
Fri May 22, 2026, 01:51 AM
11 hrs ago

But she gave a famous face and focus for people who really wanted to yell about the Bernie Bros. She just made for a convenient locus for the ire.

I think she rubbed some Boomers the wrong way. She's kind of more their thing. And of course, being a woman, she gets that extra target on her back. Just like how Gillibrand single-handedly brought down Al Franken and no man within 1,000 miles of Washington had any kind of opinions on that.

It's just people needing a villain, and women make for better villains.

No one under 50 was hanging on Susan Sarandon's political opinions. People can't accept that in 2016, people didn't really live with Hillary Clinton the same way anymore. They didn't come up with her. They didn't watch her in the 90s. They only really knew her as probably the most privileged white woman in the world at a time when progressives involved with intersectionality were really interrogating that privilege. She was a big meh for a lot of people. But the people who have been invested in her for decades and strongly identified with her biography just could not - and still cannot - perceive that she was no longer viewed in that same deferential way by younger generations.

There was a generational divide on the hagiography that came to the fore in 2016.

Which is why Sarandon being the villain is really funny. There are so many reasons that election went pear-shaped, and I don't think I'd put an elderly former actress in the top 100 there. Like there was an army of twentysomething men roaming around, "Susan Sarandon said what?! Shit, that's all you had to say!"

Response to BigmanPigman (Original post)

ColoringFool

(1,104 posts)
15. What is your point? Famous people by definition have influence to some degree.....
Fri May 22, 2026, 03:00 AM
10 hrs ago

It is, however, impossible to measure ....

But you know this. So to reiterate: What's your point?

BigmanPigman

(55,542 posts)
16. I was reading a current article about her
Fri May 22, 2026, 03:15 AM
10 hrs ago

and she was put on a level as a profoundly enlightened woman at the age of 78 and she was praised as if she walked on water. I chose to differ.

Cha

(320,703 posts)
18. Bradly Whitford call her out on her LIES
Fri May 22, 2026, 05:42 AM
7 hrs ago

about Hillar

Bradley Whitford to Susan Sarandon: 'Are you incapable of admitting you were wrong' about Hillary Clinton?

I don't think she's very popular in Hollywood. I recall her whining about it once.

betsuni

(29,306 posts)
20. "Always Bet on the Wrong Horse, My Life as an Activist Against Progress and Democracy," a memoir by Susan Sarandon.
Fri May 22, 2026, 08:16 AM
5 hrs ago

ms liberty

(11,378 posts)
21. She was not at all influential outside her own sphere of fame and activism
Fri May 22, 2026, 08:32 AM
4 hrs ago

There are a lot of commenters replaying everything she said and did in that time period, but as far as her so-called "influence on voters" is concerned, the real question becomes, who was really listening to what she said and did? How many people were following her, and forming their opinions based on her? How many voters did she sway?

I would contend that it was very few, excepting perhaps those directly in her real world interactions. IRL for me at least, no one was talking about her or her opinion. She was just another celebrity, being a celebrity with a political candidate. "Oh yea, wasn't she in Bull Durham?"

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How influential was Susan...