General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (applegrove) on Thu May 21, 2026, 08:21 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
AloeVera
(4,421 posts)Of course that was always utter bollocks and now we have the receipts.
applegrove
(133,178 posts)EdmondDantes_
(2,104 posts)Given the demographics of college students, particularly those doing the protest encampments, pretending that none of the campus antisemitism is from leftists doesn't pass the laugh test. We know many of the campus protestors identified as eco-socialists, anti racist, anti colonialism. Those are left wing positions.
Then there's that when I use the heat map he links to, it doesn't match what he says and shows. When I filter to just Left Wing and Islamist, there's 205 incidents over the dataset. And the total number isn't 40,180, if I select all types, it's 31,988, but if I clear all filters of ideology type (right wing 3 varieties, left wing, Islamic, unknown, Other), the total jumps to 67,810 over 2002-2025. So something with the dataset is wonky. They've also added some from 2026 but I left that out to keep my comparison the same. So there's 27,700 incidents over the data set he isn't including that aren't categorized.
Also it's not accurate that he lumps Other and Unknown into right wing given there are categories for those.
If I look at just 2025 data, the report when the 7 ideology types, I get 705 incidents but if I deselect all types, there's the 6,542 the report mentions.
The FAQ isn't helpful to explain the missing information, so my guess (and it's just a guess) is that the ideology type is only applied if someone is arrested or interacts with the police. Looking at the list view for example an anonymous bomb threat can't really be categorized if no one is charged. I'm not sure why that wouldn't go under Unknown or Other, but it's not.
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(15,045 posts)JBTaurus83
(1,694 posts)Wont be rushing to comment on this. Reading this site, sometimes Id think left leaning voters have all become neo-Nazis or something.
Sympthsical
(11,128 posts)Why promote something that is so verifiably untrue? Does Rashid think everyone just hallucinated all the video footage of anti-Jewish attacks and harassment over the past few years?
I can name three recent high profile antisemitic attacks that came from the free Gaza crowd off the top of my head. Hell, the ADL article Qasim is referencing gives you four right off the bat.
I can't speak to what's going on with the ADL's website or data layout. But Rashid knows full well there are more than three. So why write that article? It's weird people try very hard to minimize obvious things. There's gaslighting and then there's virulent propaganda.
If you're trying to gaslight people about bigoted behavior, you're not on the side of angels. Sorry.
applegrove
(133,178 posts)Israel and Zionism: ADL is careful to not conflate general criticism of Israel or anti-Israel activism with antisemitism. Legitimate political protest, support for Palestinian rights or expressions of opposition to Israeli policies are not included in the Audit.
Sympthsical
(11,128 posts)I'm talking about violence. Laying hands on people. Harassing people on the street or on campus. Vandalizing places of worship and businesses.
Not criticism of Israel.
And to stand there and go, "100% on the Right. Only three ever from the radical Left" is so breathtakingly untrue, I absolutely side-eye the motive.
As I said, it's a weird position to take and disseminate around. If this were any other ethnic group, people would be setting things on fire in protest at how ridiculous the assertion is.
But it's Jews. So it gets . . . shared around approvingly?
But we mustn't read into that. Not one bit. Perish the thought that people denying bigotry might - just maybe - have some issues of their own with that bigotry.
Well, I am 100% reading into that. It's daylight. I can see people. I consider dissemination of this stuff motivated by nefarious intent. Full stop.
applegrove
(133,178 posts)EdmondDantes_
(2,104 posts)Much of that won't be categorized but Rashid is lumping that under right wing by virtue of not being left wing or Islamic. But we can infer from context that an anti-Israel protest at a synagogue that has people yelling "Jewish pricks" and Jews are rapists and racists, probably aren't right wing people. Likewise most campus protests would logically be primarily made up of liberal students, and while the protest as a whole wouldn't be on the list, someone saying Jewish whatever and hitting or whatever would be. The data in the heat map doesn't match what Rashid says it does.