General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAsking For Sources (factual) On Charlie Kirk's Racist, Fascist, Violent Comments
A close relative of mine, a trumper that is more open to other views, is starting to listen to me. She asked for examples of Charlie Kirk's hateful rhetoric. She didn't ask for fact checks, but I would like to have them available if I can. She recently watched Schindler's List and Mississippi Burning, and that was where the conversation started.
Where are the best places to find information like this? I've googled, and checked out Snopes and a few things on Fact Check, but I would really appreciate you, my fellow DUers, pointing me in the right direction. One vote at a time. . .
She wasn't clear on a definition of racism and gerrymandering, but I think I gave her a good briefing on those things.
Thank you in advance.
magicarpet
(19,445 posts).... anti-Trans,.. anti-woman.
+++++++++++++
Charlie Kirk built himself into the face of a conservative youth movement through Turning Point USA (TPUSA). Behind the branding of patriotism and freedom, the record shows a pattern of rhetoric, organizational culture, and alliances that echoed white supremacist and Christian nationalist ideologies. The Southern Poverty Law Center documented how TPUSA repeatedly framed immigrants, LGBTQ+ people, and racial justice advocates as existential threats to white Christian America, warning followers that their families, religion, and entire way of life were under attack. In later years, Kirk openly embraced Christian nationalist language, claiming that liberty was only possible with a Christian populationa narrative tying freedom to demographic dominance, a cornerstone of supremacist logic (SPLC).
On race, Kirk was blunt and dismissive. He denied the existence of systemic racism, called white privilege a racist idea, and vilified critical race theory as dangerous indoctrination. In one speech, he called George Floyd a scumbag, showing open contempt for a man whose death triggered a national reckoning on race and policing (WHYY). These rhetorical choices were not accidentalthey functioned as a political strategy to delegitimize Black pain and deny the realities of structural racism in America.
Inside TPUSA, the culture reflected the same hostility. A New Yorker investigation described the workplace as difficult
and rife with tension, some of it racial. One African American staffer reported being the only person of color when hired in 2014, only to be fired on Martin Luther King Jr. Day. The organizations thennational field director, Crystal Clanton, was exposed for texting, I hate black people.
End of story. TPUSA claimed it acted after the texts surfaced, but the damage was undeniablethe rot reached the top (New Yorker).
Kirks movement also courted or tolerated figures openly tied to the far right. Political Research Associates documented cases where TPUSA chapters hosted or aligned with Nick Fuentes and his white nationalist followers. Kirks allies relied on antisemitic tropes, praising authoritarianism in Israel while denouncing liberal Jews in the United States (PRA). TPUSA severed ties when public exposure threatened its reputation, but the repeated associations revealed how far Kirk was willing to go in pursuit of influence.
Much more at link below,...
https://racism.org/articles/defining-racism/white-privilege/12835-charlie-kirk-white-supremacist