all Nazi-saluting f*cking Nazis are Hitler.

There. Fixed it.

Belive it or not it's 'hoist on his own petard'. Not "hoisted'. Yeah it sounds weird, but many expressions that we borrowed from French way back when don't translate directly.

(Mom was an English professor.)

I thank you for providing this information in such a polite manner. I hope I’m able to do the same as I’m mot trying to cause offense. This is an attempt to put together what info I have on the subject, so read on if interested.
If one is quoting it’s likely originator Shakespeare, it’d be “hoist with his own petar(d),” but if following decades of popular use either “hoist” or “hoisted” is generally accepted. A petard is an explosive device rather than an impaling one, so it makes more sense to say one is hoist(ed) (raised up) “by” or “with” one rather than “on”. When I first read or heard the expression not knowing what a petard was, I imagined someone being lifted after being impaled by a sword. Yet, years after learning a petard is neither not an instrument by which you can impale someone and then lift them up like in Medieval fiction, it still comes to mind before the, let’s say, antics of Wile E Coyote. Wile E Coyote who has made a career out of being harmed by or with his own designs. I suppose he has at times hoisted himself “on” his own petard whenever he’s straddled an Acme rocket to catch the roadrunner, but that has different meaning.
Although “petar(d)has its roots in French, hoise and its past participle hoist (hoised) have there roots in Middle English (Germanic). I don’t believe the expression’s origin is French rather than another attributable to Shakespeare (Hamlet). Hoisted is now the past participle for hoist and commonly used with this expression. Justice Matters’s use here is commonly accepted outside of English literature classes and isolated cocktail gatherings.

Just like this guy:

Welcome to DU

Therefore all Republicans are pedophiles?

Although I have to admit I believed he meant it, until I looked into it a bit further.

It's not an act. It's a daily occurrence. See below why he ended up so rich despite it.

to get concentration camped?

Next time you get the urge to think Elmo or any of his compatriots are filthy rich because he's smart, stop yourself and think. No, he's not smart. He shows that day in and day out. He, like most billionaires, simply won the lottery. They were in exactly the right place, at exactly the right time, with the right idea they usually stole from someone else, and a bit more cutthroat than their competition. That's right, Bill Gates, I'm look straight at you too. It's the lottery fallacy. What we think is skill and talent is really just pure chance. And they deserve some kind of special dispensation? Oh, hell no!

I’m betting “Grok” gets a tune up in the near future. Can’t be countering Reichwing bullshit with actual facts, don’t ya know?

saw their wages decrease during Nazi reign. The Nazis outlawed any independent worker movements and replaced them with state sanctioned (Nazi) approved organizations. These state approved groups were not pro-worker but were pro-production. The less you pay each worker, the more workers you can "employ." It wasn't slave labor but not the greatest situation for workers either.

Yeah

To Mars or the outer reaches of the Milky Way

Thanks for the thread Justice matters

“Matt Damon is an actor, therefore all actors are Matt Damon.”

Or . . .

“Elon Musk is an addict, therefore all addicts are Elon Musk.”

He supports fascism. He's a fan of apartheid. Hitler is his role model, or should be.

how much Musk Rat denied it.

This is a screenshot, so anyone can fake what is printed on there using his name.
Even I know how to do that, so does that make me smarter than Musk?

I'm being told that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is actually Communist North Korea. Who knew?