Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

chowder66

(12,454 posts)
1. Oh c'mon, there's only 61 listed on my sample ballot.
Mon May 4, 2026, 08:34 PM
Monday

Last edited Mon May 4, 2026, 09:39 PM - Edit history (1)

There are 15 judges with about 4 of them running unchallenged, another 3 are not qualified, the rest were a slog to investigate but I did it!!
I'm stuck on one State Senator 24th district, the Treasurer and still have to investigate 2 props.

I spent about 6.5 hours digging and digging because damn it, I'm not sitting any election out ever!!
Hopefully I'll be done with my selections tomorrow and drop off my ballot on Wednesday or Thursday.

edited to correct the count to 61. lol

lostincalifornia

(5,487 posts)
3. Thank-you, that makes it so much better. Fortunately I have a mail in ballot so
Mon May 4, 2026, 08:43 PM
Monday

I can take my time.

It’s ridiculous.

I am in Santa Clara county and we only have one judge unchallenged.

chowder66

(12,454 posts)
4. I hear ya. I'm in L.A.
Mon May 4, 2026, 08:48 PM
Monday

I don't really mind tooooo much.
Gotta know what the hell I'm voting for, so I always set aside a couple of days to investigate.
I typically wait a bit for the LA Times endorsements which I find helpful but they aren't out yet so I've been digging into statements, interviews, candidate sites and their endorsements which I do anyway.... even when the LAT endorsements come out.


Brother Buzz

(40,294 posts)
2. Pfft, the 2005 California Special Election had over twice that number...and it wasn't a primary.
Mon May 4, 2026, 08:40 PM
Monday

I had to take my shoes off to count, and my tally of 133 candidates is a little fuzzy because I was still wearing socks.

https://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/special-elections/2003-statewide/2003_cert_list.pdf

chowder66

(12,454 posts)
6. I just love the phonebook sized sample ballots when they arrive!
Mon May 4, 2026, 08:50 PM
Monday

Luckily we usually have it whittled down to just a few candidates - except JUDGES. Though admittedly that information is now a bit better to extrapolate.

lostincalifornia

(5,487 posts)
9. The point is that it could be quite confusing trying to find the candidate you want if you walk into a polling
Tue May 5, 2026, 10:45 AM
20 hrs ago

place to vote.

I would hope most people would vote by mail, so they take their time finding the candidate they want, and mark it correctly.

I wonder how many of those candidates are in the race to muddy up the works?

BannonsLiver

(20,797 posts)
10. Most are just vanity candidates who want to see their name on a ballot, or they're batshit crazy.
Tue May 5, 2026, 11:17 AM
19 hrs ago

Either way increasing the filing fee would end a lot of this silliness.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There are around 60 candi...