Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,569 posts)
Sat May 2, 2026, 07:14 PM Saturday

Someone let the AP know that Trump violating 31 court orders is not a sign of "executive power. "



AP Finds 31 Court Order Violations by Trump Administration

An Associated Press review of court records revealed that in the first 15 months of President Trump's second term, district judges ruled his administration violated orders in at least 31 lawsuits covering immigration, spending cuts, and layoffs. Examples include denying bond to immigrants after rulings declared it unlawful, deporting alleged gang members despite injunctions, and withholding aid from states not aiding immigration efforts. Legal experts called the pattern unprecedented compared to prior administrations.

Legal scholars and former federal judges said they could recall at most a few violations of court rulings over the full four-year terms of other recent presidential administrations, including Trump’s first time in office. They also noted previous administrations were generally apologetic when confronted by judges; the Trump administration’s Justice Department has been outright combative in some cases.

read more: https://apnews.com/article/trump-courts-contempt-defiance-7b94b24901d42961afe323d02e352733
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Someone let the AP know that Trump violating 31 court orders is not a sign of "executive power. " (Original Post) bigtree Saturday OP
Damn Delphinus Saturday #1
Better headline UpInArms Saturday #2
maybe judges could issue sanctions or contempt orders instead of whinin msongs Saturday #3
sanctions to who? bigtree Yesterday #4

bigtree

(94,569 posts)
4. sanctions to who?
Sun May 3, 2026, 12:30 AM
Yesterday

...a sitting president has never been held in contempt of court, and higher courts have historically been reluctant to allow contempt sanctions against the federal government.

Anyway, that's a bit short of where we presently are.

Appeals court orders judge to end contempt investigation of Trump administration deportation flights
https://apnews.com/article/trump-judge-boasberg-contempt-f5ab5110336be20773e8aa8d5b484879

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Someone let the AP know t...