Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JustKay

(165 posts)
Sat May 2, 2026, 01:55 PM Saturday

My letter to Chief Justice John Roberts. His address is enclosed. You should write him too!

Chief Justice John Roberts
Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543

Dear Chief Justice Roberts,

I am writing in response to the Court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which I believe will stand as a defining—and deeply troubling—moment in your tenure.

By narrowing the practical reach of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the Court has made it significantly harder to challenge maps that dilute minority voting power. Requiring proof of intent rather than confronting discriminatory effects does not neutralize injustice—it insulates it. As this Court has demonstrated, history has repeatedly shown that discrimination rarely announces itself openly, and legal standards that depend on proving intent risk rendering civil rights protections hollow.

The purpose of the Voting Rights Act was not to create a race-neutral abstraction, but to remedy specific, well-documented patterns of disenfranchisement. Treating all groups as equally vulnerable to vote dilution disregards the very history the law was designed to confront.

The Court has long claimed to be guided by precedent, restraint, and fidelity to the Constitution. This decision calls those commitments into question. When legal reasoning produces outcomes that predictably and intentionally weaken the political voice of historically marginalized communities, it is reasonable to ask whether the Court is fulfilling its role as a guardian of equal protection.

You are well aware that the legitimacy of the Court rests not only on its authority, but on public confidence that its decisions are grounded in principle rather than outcome-driven reasoning. Decisions like this erode that confidence.

This decision places the Court in the role of validating systemic inequality in American elections. History will remember that.


27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
My letter to Chief Justice John Roberts. His address is enclosed. You should write him too! (Original Post) JustKay Saturday OP
Excellent letter. sinkingfeeling Saturday #1
Oh my. What a well stated and powerful letter. I am not able to articulate as well. I would happily though, undersign Ninga Saturday #2
Great letter, bad recipient. I'll bet Roberts knows or has heard every one of your points. He may even agree with some Fil1957 Saturday #3
Agreed! JustKay Saturday #4
Good on you! Fil1957 Saturday #5
In reality........ popsdenver Saturday #6
I agree, but.... JustKay Saturday #10
No question, popsdenver Saturday #12
Well done! City Lights Saturday #7
"Requiring proof of intent rather than confronting discriminatory effects does not neutralize injustice--it insulates it. Martin Eden Saturday #8
"POtuS" Seinan Sensei Sunday #22
Lovely letter. Very well argued and convincing. ihaveaquestion Saturday #9
Jim Crow, 2.0 perdita9 Saturday #11
I would change the last sentence: lastlib Saturday #13
John Roberts is a white supremacist and won't care mountain grammy Saturday #14
This letter should be copied and sent to any law school and/or university no_hypocrisy Saturday #15
Damn, wish I could write this well. Great letter vapor2 Saturday #16
You should have taped a $20 bill to the bottom of the letter 70sEraVet Saturday #17
This is the new Taney Court suilebhan Saturday #18
Wow. Impressive. Joinfortmill Saturday #19
Really well done. I shall try to limit how much of it I unintentionally plagaize as I write him tonight. FadedMullet Saturday #20
He has broken his oath to his country on many occasions. tavernier Saturday #21
Brilliant Letter! stage left Sunday #23
Excellent letter. Roberts will burn it to heat his office. n/t aggiesal Sunday #24
Wonderful letter, however, Roberts is a closet zealot and does not care dlk Sunday #25
Incredibly succinct Ruby the Liberal Sunday #26
Writing letters like that is a good exercise. MineralMan Sunday #27

Ninga

(9,027 posts)
2. Oh my. What a well stated and powerful letter. I am not able to articulate as well. I would happily though, undersign
Sat May 2, 2026, 02:27 PM
Saturday

your next letter. Great job!

Fil1957

(817 posts)
3. Great letter, bad recipient. I'll bet Roberts knows or has heard every one of your points. He may even agree with some
Sat May 2, 2026, 02:46 PM
Saturday

of them.

The problem is, he just doesn't give a rat's ass about this country.

JustKay

(165 posts)
4. Agreed!
Sat May 2, 2026, 02:48 PM
Saturday

And I know he'll probably never read it, and he certainly doesn't care, but that will not stop me from using my voice and pushing back.

popsdenver

(2,515 posts)
6. In reality........
Sat May 2, 2026, 03:15 PM
Saturday

Obviously.......Roberts, nor any of the other Republican Justices give a crap about anything other than taking care of the Corporations that they serve...............

JustKay

(165 posts)
10. I agree, but....
Sat May 2, 2026, 03:30 PM
Saturday

It will not stop me from advocating for social justice. With my last breath!

Martin Eden

(15,826 posts)
8. "Requiring proof of intent rather than confronting discriminatory effects does not neutralize injustice--it insulates it.
Sat May 2, 2026, 03:21 PM
Saturday

Roberts and his five accomplices know this. As you noted later in your very well written logical letter, their ruling was driven by outcome.

I have often pondered what future historians will write about this court, this Congress, and this POtuS. My greatest fear is that fascism will prevail, and the true history of these times will be flushed down an Orwellian memory hole.

ihaveaquestion

(4,710 posts)
9. Lovely letter. Very well argued and convincing.
Sat May 2, 2026, 03:24 PM
Saturday

Unfortunately, I'm sure it's nothing he hasn't heard before and isn't likely to make an impression. He and his ilk have canned, and no doubt well-reasoned in his mind, responses to every argument you make. These are not fair-minded people. It's hard for us to imagine that a supreme court judge as affable as Roberts is, would be unreasonable, but he is. There's a barrier in his mind which nothing crosses, which was probably set in childhood by a grandfather or uncle, and which tells him that his people deserve what they have and where they are, and whatever station he rises to in life, he must do his best to protect them and theirs.

perdita9

(1,359 posts)
11. Jim Crow, 2.0
Sat May 2, 2026, 03:42 PM
Saturday

John Roberts will be remembered as an active participant in trying to destroy American democracy

lastlib

(28,497 posts)
13. I would change the last sentence:
Sat May 2, 2026, 04:16 PM
Saturday

"That will be YOUR legacy." Let him know HE owns it.

Fantastic as is, though.

It won't penetrate his thick ideological skull, but that isn't your fault, it's his.

mountain grammy

(29,147 posts)
14. John Roberts is a white supremacist and won't care
Sat May 2, 2026, 04:50 PM
Saturday

but I love your letter and will send something similar myself.. thank you for providing a guide.

I think we're in for some dark times with this court. I'm scared for friends who live on the edge and for all of us.

no_hypocrisy

(55,220 posts)
15. This letter should be copied and sent to any law school and/or university
Sat May 2, 2026, 05:15 PM
Saturday

that will have Roberts speak at their commencement.

And if that should fail, I believe the appropriate response of the graduates should be to either stand and turn their backs on Roberts or to just leave when he begins to speak.

70sEraVet

(5,584 posts)
17. You should have taped a $20 bill to the bottom of the letter
Sat May 2, 2026, 07:47 PM
Saturday

It's an excellent letter. But it's GREEN that closes the argument with these 6justices!

suilebhan

(16 posts)
18. This is the new Taney Court
Sat May 2, 2026, 07:59 PM
Saturday

You've written an excellent letter, and it's greatly appreciated. I think this court has blundered badly with this new sequel. "Dred Scott 2: Alito Boogaloo."

FadedMullet

(994 posts)
20. Really well done. I shall try to limit how much of it I unintentionally plagaize as I write him tonight.
Sat May 2, 2026, 08:35 PM
Saturday

tavernier

(14,492 posts)
21. He has broken his oath to his country on many occasions.
Sat May 2, 2026, 09:48 PM
Saturday

A letter won’t help because he has long been made blind. I’m afraid that only our voices and our votes can save us now. And a great deal of prayer.

dlk

(13,314 posts)
25. Wonderful letter, however, Roberts is a closet zealot and does not care
Sun May 3, 2026, 11:10 AM
Sunday

He (and his wife) are too busy lining their pockets.

MineralMan

(151,492 posts)
27. Writing letters like that is a good exercise.
Sun May 3, 2026, 01:33 PM
Sunday

Sadly, the odds of them being read by the person addressed are very long indeed. Still, writing it helped you organize our thoughts and share them with us. That's a good thing, no question!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My letter to Chief Justic...