General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnthropic has 'come to copyright' epiphany after Claude code leak
From Australian tech mag Startup Daily:
https://www.startupdaily.net/advice/opinion/anthropic-has-come-to-copyright-epiphany-after-claude-code-leak/
The source code for Anthropics AI chatbot, Claude, leaked.
-snip-
Anthropics response was a come to copyright moment. The company began issuing takedown notices to GitHub, using the Clinton era Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).
We issued a DMCA takedown against one repository hosting leaked Claude Code source code and its forks, the company said.
-snip-
Typical. The AI CEOs who think they're entitled to steal everyone else's intellectual property want their own protected.
Bluetus
(2,822 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 3, 2026, 07:27 PM - Edit history (1)
These AI MFers steal EVERYTHING. There is literally NOTHING in the large language models that has not been stolen. The only real difference between ChatGPT, Claude and all the rest is WHERE they decided to steal from. When they say "training data", they are talking about data they have scraped from any and all sites and never paid anybody a penny for it. At least in Musk's case, much of that came from Twitter, which he bought.
And the generative AI is the same thing. When Suno generates songs, all the rhythms, instrument sounds, jyrics, and voice timbre comes from the talents or IP of artists, again without paying a penny in compensation.
So fuck all these bastards. I hope they all steal everything from each other and they all go bust.
highplainsdem
(62,226 posts)to train their AI models. And they're continuing to steal, every day.
highplainsdem
(62,226 posts)Anthropic Suddenly Cares Intensely About Intellectual Property After Realizing With Horror That It Accidentally Leaked Claudes Source Code
That's rich.
By Frank Landymore
Published Apr 3, 2026 8:39 AM EDT
The AI industry largely acts as if its above lowly copyright laws unless, of course, those laws happen to be protecting its own interests.
As the Wall Street Journal reports, Anthropic is scrambling to contain a leak of its Claude Code AI models source code by issuing a copyright takedown request for more than 8,000 copies of it a gallingly ironic stance for the company to be taking, considering how it trained its models in the first place.
-snip-
Back when Anthropic was still a nascent splinter group formed from former OpenAI researchers, for instance, it needed access to a wealth of high quality training data to build its Claude AI model.
To do that, it first relied on digital books. But it didnt pay for them or choose only to use ones in the public domain. Instead, it downloaded millions of pirated volumes from the online shadow library LibGen. While LibGen doesnt position itself as a pirate website, Anthropic also downloaded books from a similar hub literally called Pirate Library Mirror. (Anthropic cofounder Ben Mann was ebullient about the sites launch: just in time!!! he wrote in a message to employees, along with a link to the site.)
-snip-