Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(179,906 posts)
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 05:21 PM Wednesday

Deadline Legal Blog-How John Roberts' retort sums up the case against Trump's birthright citizenship order

It’s a new world. It’s the same Constitution,” the chief justice told Solicitor General John Sauer on Wednesday.

How John Roberts’ retort sums up the case against Trump’s birthright citizenship order

💾

©

Irish News 🇮🇪 (@news-flows-ir.bsky.social) 2026-04-01T19:06:01.000000Z

https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/birthright-citizenship-supreme-court-roberts-new-world-same-constitution

If there’s one line to take away from Wednesday’s Supreme Court hearing in the birthright citizenship case, it might be this: “It’s a new world. It’s the same Constitution.”

Those words were spoken by Chief Justice John Roberts, who I predict will be with — and will possibly lead — the majority of the court in rejecting President Donald Trump’s bid to single-handedly redefine that citizenship......

“Having said all that,” Roberts replied, “you do agree that that has no impact on the legal analysis before us?”

That’s a judicial way of saying it’s irrelevant.

Sauer maintained that “we’re in a new world now, as Justice [Samuel] Alito pointed out to, where 8 billion people are one plane ride away from having a child who’s a U.S. citizen.”

That’s when the chief justice replied, “Well, it’s a new world. It’s the same Constitution.

If the court holds true to that principle, then Trump will lose this case......

Yet even the possibility that his fringe position will get any votes in this case is remarkable. “Blatantly unconstitutional” is what one federal judge called the executive order that sparked this litigation. Due to the administration’s series of lower court losses, the order hasn’t taken effect. If the high court continues that streak, it never will. If it does take effect, then it will change the country.

As Sauer alluded to in the exchange with Roberts, Alito might be the most likely justice to cast such a vote for the government, though the precise breakdown and rationale of the court’s forthcoming ruling won’t be known until it’s published, which is expected to happen by early July.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Deadline Legal Blog-How John Roberts' retort sums up the case against Trump's birthright citizenship order (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote Wednesday OP
This exchange made me smile LetMyPeopleVote Wednesday #1
Where was Roberts' legal mind and backbone Mysterian Wednesday #2
Roberts is almost always on the side of corporations Orangepeel Wednesday #3
'Fidgeting' Trump had to be moved during Supreme Court hearing: ACLU attorney LetMyPeopleVote 5 hrs ago #4

Mysterian

(6,489 posts)
2. Where was Roberts' legal mind and backbone
Wed Apr 1, 2026, 05:50 PM
Wednesday

when the corrupt fool ruled money equals speech in Citizens United?

LetMyPeopleVote

(179,906 posts)
4. 'Fidgeting' Trump had to be moved during Supreme Court hearing: ACLU attorney
Thu Apr 2, 2026, 08:33 PM
5 hrs ago

trump is too stupid to understand the concepts being discussed. trump could understand that his attorney was NOT doing a good job and that the Justices were not buying what his attorney was trying to sell

Donald Trump's unprecedented appearance at the Supreme Court encompassed both a request that his seat be moved and the reported inability of the president to hold still while lawyers made their case before the nation's highest court.

Raw Story (@rawstory.com) 2026-04-02T20:55:24Z

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-fidget-supreme-court/

Appearing on MS NOW with host Jonathan Lemire, ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero stated the president sat right in front of him, so he had a ringside seat to watch the president react to arguments over his attempt to override the 14th Amendment on birthright citizenship.....

Could you see him from your vantage point? If so, what was he like?” MS NOW’s Lemire asked.

He was six feet in front of me... he was literally right in front of me,” he recalled. “I was one row behind him, the Secret Service and then the president, so I could watch him entirely throughout the argument. Some of the press reports also got it wrong. Some of the press reports said that he left after the government had its case; the president sat through at least 10 to 15 minutes of our argument.”

“I could see him fidgeting in the chair. I literally could see him, he was literally in my line of vision,” he added. “And when our legal director, Cecillia Wang, made her opening statements, and then when she began to answer questions from the justices, you could see he started getting restless. His shoulders slumped a little bit.”

“I think he was there, clearly to intimidate the justices,” he added. “When they first had him, they sat him on the very end of the front row. And then the Commerce Secretary, Mr. [Howard] Lutnick got up and told the security guards that Mr. Trump would like to be seated more centrally in the courtroom. So they moved him literally right in front of us.”

“And then it was clear that he was endeavoring to put his thumb on the scale. He was endeavoring to glower at the justices to kind of intimidate them, almost defy them to rule against him,” he continued. “And what was remarkable, and this really is a testament that our system of checks and balances is working, that it's a coequal branch of government. Donald Trump is a guest in the Supreme Court. This is Chief Justice Roberts’ house. And there was not a mention, they did not miss a beat when he walked in, the courtroom got quiet. When he walked out, no one missed a beat.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Deadline Legal Blog-How J...