in any other sense, IMHO

unless the term 'royal assholes' is part of the mix

want him to BE KING of America!

Calling them "throwbacks" might do the trick ....

But really "fascists" is the closest to the truth.

Not to belittle them, but to use a descriptor that was an accurate reflection of their alignment to power, and more importantly, freedom and essential rights.

Fascist is indeed more accurate, but Royalist isn’t too far off the mark, and may even be more specific, at least while Trump is in power.

It’s also kind of disarming for the recipient; I mean, how would they argue back and refute the label?

Because they follow God's swill.

Grabbed that from the Sam Altman post

still fits



✌🏻

"Morons?"...."Brainless?" Anything more is giving way too much credit when none is due.

The royalists of old believed in the Divine Right of kings to rule absolutely. Today's economic royalist believe in the Divine Right of money to rule absolutely.

I don't think so. But that's just my opinion.

Saudi Arabia would be more up their alley. Absolute monarchy.

Just call it what it is.

'Royalists' means little in this context and England doesn't want their sorry asses (I'm living here) - where does this stuff come from?

with Nigel Trump (aka Nigel Farage). They’re a problem for the US- let the US sort them out, thanks. Europe has plenty of its own fascists to manage.

Or ‘cultists’

whereas even the dumbest of them knows what being called a Nazi means.

Calling them Royalists would be very inaccurate and is far too tame a descriptor, imo.