Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

erronis

(23,841 posts)
Fri Mar 27, 2026, 11:04 AM Friday

Sam Bankman-Fried and the Lies We Tell Ourselves -- Peter Beck - Lawfare

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/sam-bankman-fried-and-the-lies-we-tell-ourselves

A review of David Morris, "Stealing the Future" (Repeater, 2025).

On Feb. 12, an X account for Sam Bankman-Fried, the disgraced founder of the crypto trading platform FTX, posted, "Under Biden, companies were forced offshore. Under @realDonaldTrump, they're welcome back in America. Insane regulation by Dems: require licenses, refuse to give them out. They literally couldn't operate in America. Under President Trump, that's changed. The DOJ is no longer indicting entire industries."

It was a personal message from Bankman-Fried, who is roughly two years into a 25-year federal prison sentence for conspiracy and wire fraud stemming from FTX's dramatic collapse. The post followed a series written by Bankman-Fried the month before, communicated over a prison phone to an intermediary, and then shared with the online world. In those earlier messages, Bankman-Fried had criticized former President Biden, while lavishing praise on the Trump administration. On Jan. 29, Bankman-Fried had posted an 11-tweet thread titled, "Why I became a Republican in 2022." Reports soon confirmed what practically everyone could already see: Bankman-Fried was lobbying President Trump for a pardon.

In "Stealing the Future," David Morris makes the case that Bankman-Fried's fraud was driven not primarily by greed, accident, or negligence, though each certainly played a part, but by an "ends justify the means" hubris instilled in Bankman-Fried by the effective altruist movement. Morris, a financial journalist who was among the first to cover FTX's collapse, uses the story of Bankman-Fried's fall from grace to critique the cultural and intellectual forces that shaped him. Few are left spared in Morris's account, from other FTX employees, to Stanford University, from effective altruism's intellectual leadership to the upper echelons of the technology capitalist class.

The book retells the notorious story of FTX's unraveling, which began in November 2022 when a company balance sheet that was circulated on social media revealed that the cryptocurrency exchange's financial stability relied heavily on holdings from an investment firm named Alameda Research. It soon became clear that Alameda was a shell company operating under Caroline Ellison, Bankman-Fried's meek, off-and-on lover and Alameda's CEO, whom Bankman-Fried had micromanaged on a daily basis into making specific investments. The problem, however, was worse than that: Bankman-Fried had transferred billions of dollars directly from FTX customers' accounts to pay for Alameda's investments.

. . .


Expect a pardon soon and an appointment within the Treasury Department.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sam Bankman-Fried and the Lies We Tell Ourselves -- Peter Beck - Lawfare (Original Post) erronis Friday OP
I remember him Yeller Friday #1
What on earth is "effective altruism"? mwmisses4289 Friday #2
Just a feel-good phrase. Like trump's "affordability". erronis Friday #3
It's a theory on social good EdmondDantes_ Friday #4
Thank you for that explanation. mwmisses4289 Saturday #5
That's my opinion of it as well EdmondDantes_ Saturday #6

Yeller

(19 posts)
1. I remember him
Fri Mar 27, 2026, 11:08 AM
Friday

He pushed that 'I'm for the altruistic rich thing' so many fall for. Suckers, they don't care about anything in politics and/or money people.

EdmondDantes_

(1,783 posts)
4. It's a theory on social good
Fri Mar 27, 2026, 03:58 PM
Friday
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_altruism

Loosely summarized today it says you should maximize your good to the world by going into high earning careers and donate to whatever are deemed the most effective charities. But they have a weird math based approach so stuff that has a low likelihood of killing everyone gets credit for helping infinite people because if humanity doesn't die out you saved all those unborn people.

It feels a lot like buying indulgences in that the movement has decided that donating money gives you credit for saving the world which leads to people like Bankman-Fried saying he was doing all these things to raise as much money as possible, but then not actually doing so.

There's no relation between Caroline Ellison and Larry Ellison.

mwmisses4289

(4,143 posts)
5. Thank you for that explanation.
Sat Mar 28, 2026, 12:20 PM
Saturday

Last edited Sat Mar 28, 2026, 12:54 PM - Edit history (1)

So basically instead of doing actual good work (volunteering, donating, etc.), you just say you are raising money for something nonprofit and you're good to go? Sounds like another way for the super wealthy to grift and not actually do anything.

EdmondDantes_

(1,783 posts)
6. That's my opinion of it as well
Sat Mar 28, 2026, 12:36 PM
Saturday

In theory there's a better side, and yes targeting donations to groups that are being the most productive is a good thing, but from the ones I've seen and the rationalist movement it's related to, I'm pretty sure most of them are just high on their own supply of how much better they are than others.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sam Bankman-Fried and the...