Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

aggiesal

(10,757 posts)
Sat Mar 14, 2026, 02:40 PM Saturday

So I'm watchingthe movie ''The Post'', about the Washington Post on the Pentagon Papers ...

There is a scene in a restaurant where Ben Bradlee won't back down about the Post Reporter, that the Nixon White House, won't approve the reporter credentials.

Bradlee says "We can't have an administration dictating to us our coverage just because they don't like what we print about them in our newspaper."

Imagine if we had an Editor that would be that resolute against the current Administration?

I'm old enough to remember all this.
How far have we fallen!

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So I'm watchingthe movie ''The Post'', about the Washington Post on the Pentagon Papers ... (Original Post) aggiesal Saturday OP
We are watching "All The President's Men" right now underpants Saturday #1
🤔 Sounds familiar 🤔 (tapping foot, tapping foot, ...) n/t aggiesal Saturday #2
The sequel with BEZOS under KRASNOV will cancel things out. UTUSN Saturday #3
That movie and SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #4
👍🏼 With 2 different actors playing Ben Bradlee. n/t aggiesal Saturday #5
Watergate as a scandal feels quaint now fujiyamasan Saturday #6
Iran-EpsteinGate n/t aggiesal Saturday #7
Mr. B. studied communications and the Fairness Doctrine in college, how quaint now...... joanbarnes Saturday #8
This looks like a great movie! ShazzieB Saturday #9
Get the popcorn ready ... aggiesal Saturday #11
What sop found from Einstein... Kid Berwyn Saturday #10

underpants

(196,200 posts)
1. We are watching "All The President's Men" right now
Sat Mar 14, 2026, 02:51 PM
Saturday

The slush fund was basically donations to Nixon, who everyone knew was going to win, to gain his favor or avoid his wrath. Sounds familiar.

fujiyamasan

(1,623 posts)
6. Watergate as a scandal feels quaint now
Sat Mar 14, 2026, 03:39 PM
Saturday

We have the equivalent of a watergate everyday.

Press gave up reporting on it for the most part.

ShazzieB

(22,520 posts)
9. This looks like a great movie!
Sat Mar 14, 2026, 05:25 PM
Saturday

Somehow this film escaped my notice until now, but I definitely want to watch it!

aggiesal

(10,757 posts)
11. Get the popcorn ready ...
Sat Mar 14, 2026, 05:46 PM
Saturday

The movie is similar to what we are going through right now.
I will not spoiler alert.

Let me know what you think of the movie.

There is an early scene where Meryl Streep's character accidently knock a chair down while walking through the maze of tables.
That was not in the script, but Director Steven Spielberg, said it shows how busy she was, that it was perfect, so he left it in.

Kid Berwyn

(24,185 posts)
10. What sop found from Einstein...
Sat Mar 14, 2026, 05:46 PM
Saturday


"Why Socialism?" from the First issue of Monthly Review magazine in 1949.

The following paragraph from his essay touched on the evils of corporate media consolidation, a problem even at that time. Enstein's observations are even more true now than they were during FDR's day.

"Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones. The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society. This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature. The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population. Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education). It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights."

https://monthlyreview.org/articles/why-socialism/

DU OP: https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=21097137
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So I'm watchingthe movie ...