Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAIPAC's Attack on the Liberal Zionists
Why is the lobby targeting liberal supporters of Israel?
https://jewishcurrents.org/aipacs-attack-on-the-liberal-zionists

Daniel Biss, running in a Democratic Congressional primary in Illinois, has weathered attacks from an AIPAC-linked super PAC.
Since late February, an AIPAC-linked super PAC called Elect Chicago Women has spent $1.4 million attacking Evanston, Illinois mayor Daniel Biss, a liberal Zionist running in the Democratic primary for a Chicago-area House seat. It seemed a replay of the tactic AIPAC used in February in New Jerseys 11th Congressional district, where the pro-Israel group spent over $2 million against the moderate pro-Israel Democrat Tom Malinowski, who had been open to conditioning aid to Israel. AIPACs strategy there backfired after their attacks on Malinowski led to the Democratic primary victory of Analilla Mejia, a more left-wing candidate who has called Israels actions in Gaza a genocide. The attacks on Biss resurface the puzzle of the Malinowski race: Why is AIPAC using its resources to attack liberal Zionists, particularly in races where they face opponents farther to their left?
This week, with just days to go before the March 17th election, AIPACs strategy in Illinois appears to have shifted. As the more left-wing candidate, Kat Abughazaleh, moves into second placeonly four points behind Biss, according to a new pollAIPAC is now spending heavily against her. In recent weeks, the AIPAC-linked super PAC Chicago Progressive Partnership has dropped around $1 million against Abughazaleh, who opposes all weapons sales to Israel. The last-minute turn against Abughazaleh seems to be an indication that AIPACs attacks on Biss could be pushing voters towards Abughazaleh, rather than their preferred candidate, State Senator Laura Fine, said Usamah Andrabi, the communications director for the progressive electoral group Justice Democrats, which has endorsed Abughazaleh. That was a misstep that probably led to more voters going to Kat, and now in the 11th hour theyre spending against Kat, he said.
The pricey last-minute attacks on Abughazaleh highlight the bind in which AIPAC has found itself, as it struggles to oppose both leftist critics of Israel, and liberal Democrats who were formerly willing to join the AIPAC camp. Political observers say AIPAC is focusing their money on liberal Democrats because they are going after the candidates thought to be the front-runners in their districts, and because the liberals increasingly support conditions on aid to Israel, a position that AIPAC sees as anathema. There is no safe liberal Zionist, centrist position that a candidate can take that will keep AIPAC off their back, said Beth Miller, the political director of the anti-Zionist group JVP Action. AIPAC is making it very clear that if you support Palestinian rights at all, and you are a possible contender, then youre on their list.
Biss and Malinowski told Jewish Currents that there is another reason why AIPAC is going after them: As candidates with close ties to the Jewish community and a track record of supporting Israel, they say AIPAC is worried they will be particularly effective at moving the rest of the Democratic Party toward opposing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and supporting some limits on aid to Israel. Malinowski said an AIPAC official told him earlier this year that the organization was most concerned about the influence of centrist critics of Israel. Theyve decided that moderate pro-Israel Democrats who are willing to criticize Netanyahu are a bigger problem for them than outright anti-Zionists, Malinowski told Jewish Currents. Biss said he understood why AIPAC sees him as a threat. AIPAC wants to be able to dismiss any criticism of the conduct of the current Israeli government as being from people who are against the idea of Israel existing as a Jewish democratic state in the first place, and who are knee jerk, reflexively opposed, he said. They cant pull it off with someone like me, and that worries them.
snip
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
AIPAC's Attack on the Liberal Zionists (Original Post)
Celerity
18 hrs ago
OP
80 members (15%) of the current US Congress have AIPAC as their all-time top contributor per OpenSecrets reports.
Celerity
17 hrs ago
#3
Sometimes, we think Congress is the worst, but they really are the best Congress money can buy!
Intractable
17 hrs ago
#4
harumph
(3,217 posts)1. In a sense this is good because the mask has come down.
Criticism of Bibi and Likud and fellow travelers is sold as antisemitism by these motherfuckers.
I hope more people are on to their cheap-ass and frankly embarrassing ploy. It's similar to republicans wearing fucking flag pins and criticizing those who choose not to as being anti-patriotic.
Intractable
(1,956 posts)2. How about AIPAC just buy the weapons instead of our politicians?
I'm sure Israel gets orders of magnitude more in return for AIPAC's investment.
Both Schumer and Jeffries take AIPAC money. It's a problem.
Celerity
(54,249 posts)3. 80 members (15%) of the current US Congress have AIPAC as their all-time top contributor per OpenSecrets reports.
https://www.trackaipac.com/shame
Figures listed reflect total spending by all pro-Israel PACs and their bundlers that we have identified.
8 Senators. 72 Representatives.
36 Republicans. 44 Democrats.
Figures listed reflect total spending by all pro-Israel PACs and their bundlers that we have identified.
8 Senators. 72 Representatives.
36 Republicans. 44 Democrats.
a selection of Dems and Rethugs already in the Senate and the House:
https://www.trackaipac.com/congress





































































Intractable
(1,956 posts)4. Sometimes, we think Congress is the worst, but they really are the best Congress money can buy!
leftstreet
(40,272 posts)5. Watching this self-own trainwreck is gold
no_hypocrisy
(54,808 posts)6. Same old meme: The wrong kind of Jew.
