Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nitpicked

(1,742 posts)
Thu Mar 12, 2026, 03:29 PM Thursday

Politics Iran War: U.S. Navy will escort vessels through Strait of Hormuz as soon as 'militarily possible,' Bessent tell

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/12/iran-war-us-navy-strait-of-hormuz-oil-bessent.html

Politics
Iran War: U.S. Navy will escort vessels through Strait of Hormuz as soon as ‘militarily possible,’ Bessent tells Sky News

The U.S. Navy will begin escorting ships through the Strait of Hormuz as soon as “militarily possible,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Sky News on Thursday.

“That was always in our planning, that there’s the chance that the U.S. Navy or perhaps an international coalition will be escorting oil tankers through,” Bessent said in that interview.

“It is my belief that as soon as it is militarily possible, the U.S. Navy and perhaps with an international coalition, will be escorting vessels through,” he said.
(snip)
“It is a prospect as soon ... we have complete control of the skies,” Bessent said.
(snip)
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Politics Iran War: U.S. Navy will escort vessels through Strait of Hormuz as soon as 'militarily possible,' Bessent tell (Original Post) nitpicked Thursday OP
I'm sorry, the Treasury Secy is the new military spokesman and a freshly minted ME expert? hatrack Thursday #1
So glad that we're no longer policing the world Esox Lucius Thursday #2
It's funny hardly any media notices that they are often getting info from the wrong cabinet person Ilikepurple Thursday #4
It was another attempt at market manipulation. 617Blue Thursday #6
Worked slightly nitpicked Thursday #7
1600 (at this moment) nitpicked Thursday #12
Hedge Fund Managers have opinions, too! leftstreet Thursday #9
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Thursday #3
Came close in 1988 nitpicked Thursday #8
Why is Treas Sec commenting on this? It's also a meaningless statement. 617Blue Thursday #5
Because no one in even Trumps military is dumb enough to try and bluff Iran on this? Volaris Thursday #16
;-{)..... Goonch Thursday #10
LOL leftstreet Thursday #11
So, a protection racket? OC375 Thursday #13
Just getting reports on potential Navy operations from the Secretary of the Treasury Prairie Gates Thursday #14
Bessent is a such a clown.... democratsruletheday Thursday #15
The tankers aren't going to be boarded by pirates. How are they going to protect them? Liberal In Texas Thursday #17
US naval ships can in fact shoot down drones quite well NickB79 Thursday #18
This is the military equivalent of Trump's health plan being released in "two weeks" almost a decade ago now. BannonsLiver Thursday #19
Of course, as soon as it's "militarily possible" it'll no longer be "militarily necessary". Buns_of_Fire Thursday #20

hatrack

(64,759 posts)
1. I'm sorry, the Treasury Secy is the new military spokesman and a freshly minted ME expert?
Thu Mar 12, 2026, 03:31 PM
Thursday

Fucking spare me.

Ilikepurple

(619 posts)
4. It's funny hardly any media notices that they are often getting info from the wrong cabinet person
Thu Mar 12, 2026, 03:45 PM
Thursday

They’ll all run defense and deflection for each other. “ That was always in our planning, that there’s the chance”? Recognizing that there was a chance does not constitute planning. Also, “ It is my belief that as soon as it is militarily possible, the U.S. Navy and perhaps with an international coalition”, a lot of hedging here. Not even “I’ve been told” or “we have an international coalition lined up.” The actual information in these statements is so low that it’s only report worthy for its lack of any new definitive information. I guess CNBC is doing their part to keep the hope alive.

Response to nitpicked (Original post)

Volaris

(11,656 posts)
16. Because no one in even Trumps military is dumb enough to try and bluff Iran on this?
Thu Mar 12, 2026, 07:15 PM
Thursday

Prairie Gates

(7,989 posts)
14. Just getting reports on potential Navy operations from the Secretary of the Treasury
Thu Mar 12, 2026, 06:26 PM
Thursday

You know, very normal stuff going on.

democratsruletheday

(1,868 posts)
15. Bessent is a such a clown....
Thu Mar 12, 2026, 07:12 PM
Thursday

even in the huge Trumpler circle of clowns. Send in the clowns...they're already here.

Liberal In Texas

(16,222 posts)
17. The tankers aren't going to be boarded by pirates. How are they going to protect them?
Thu Mar 12, 2026, 07:17 PM
Thursday

Drones can swoop in for very far away and hit a ship and a naval vessel can't do a thing about it.

NickB79

(20,315 posts)
18. US naval ships can in fact shoot down drones quite well
Thu Mar 12, 2026, 07:31 PM
Thursday

It's what the CIWS Phalanx gun system is designed to do; destroy anything within 2-3 miles of the ship with a barrage of 20mm shells. Missiles, drones, helicopters, small watercraft.

BannonsLiver

(20,506 posts)
19. This is the military equivalent of Trump's health plan being released in "two weeks" almost a decade ago now.
Thu Mar 12, 2026, 07:32 PM
Thursday

Buns_of_Fire

(19,123 posts)
20. Of course, as soon as it's "militarily possible" it'll no longer be "militarily necessary".
Thu Mar 12, 2026, 08:29 PM
Thursday

The manly-man Defense Secretary must've been too hung over to deliver the message himself.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Politics Iran War: U.S. N...