Of a bank locking its doors to prevent a run?

Reminds me of 2008.

If we are hoping Trump figures something out during his coveted golf time we are screwed

Nor could any of the clowns he has appointed to figure it out.

Because according to the article below, the 5% limit already existed. It's not new.

At least what I find interesting is that investors were looking to pull out about 10%. I don’t know if that’s because they saw opportunity somewhere else or an increased risk in this credit fund. The appearance, or should I say the reality, of illiquidity can start runs on withdrawals across markets. I don’t think there’s reason to panic with this news, but if enough big $ panic or try to make big moves, it could reverberate through other markets.

The part of the tweet that is slightly misleading is that Blackrock “blocked” the withdrawal. The 5% limit already existed. The more significant part as you said is that someone tried the withdrawal.

As you had correctly noted. I just wanted to note, albeit hastily and clumsily, that it wasn’t business as usual either.

The fund in question is not advertised as liquid. The terms specifically mention that Blackrock can throttle transactions. Investors chasing higher returns in a private equity fund take bigger risks.

The REAL story is that investors are losing faith in private equity. That doesn’t bode well for the economy.

Greedy bastards are on a continuous loop. They're never satisfied. It's always, "more, MORE, MORE!

The S&L debacle, junk bonds, derivatives, tranches, private equity.....they're always looking for ways to game the system. It used to take brains to be successful, now all it takes is unbridled greed and someone willing to invent the newest con-game.

And they can't understand why some people don't trust our monetary system.

More like the fact that private credit is not liquid like stocks or treasuries. Selling the private credit instruments takes time. A bank run is particularly bad as the bank usually only has 10% of deposits on hand and the rest loaned out without the ability at all to call back the loans. Selling a corporate bond or private credit instrument is lot like calling in the loan - it is finding another buyer for the loan. On a mark to market basis, it’s there up to a loss of a few percent, but converting to cash takes time.

Investment management firm BlackRock BLK -7.17% ▼ has imposed limits on withdrawals from one of its flagship private credit funds after several investors rushed to pull money, marking another sign of stress in a sector that had been booming just a year ago. Following the news, BLK stock declined 6% on Friday.

The sell-off spilled into the broader private equity sector, with Blue Owl Capital OWL -5.04% ▼ down 4.1%, KKR KKR -4.46% ▼ off 4%, Carlyle Group CG -5.36% ▼ down 3.7%, Apollo Global Management APO -2.28% ▼ slipping 3.2%, and Ares Management ARES -6.01% ▼ falling 4.6%.

The firm disclosed that its $26 billion HPS Corporate Lending Fund received $1.2 billion in redemption requests in the first quarter, about 9.3% of its net asset value.

Because the fund’s structure allows only 5% of assets to be redeemed in a quarter, BlackRock will pay out $620 million and defer the remaining requests, activating its withdrawal limit mechanism.

More at:

https://www.tipranks.com/news/investor-rush-to-exit-hits-blackrock-blk-as-it-limits-withdrawals-stock-drops-6

The one of interest to me is Blue Owl …

That is definitely troubling

Blue Owl has $48 million exposure to collapsed UK property lender, Bloomberg News reports

March 6 (Reuters) - Alternative asset manager Blue Owl has a 36 million pound ($48 million) exposure to Century Capital Partners Ltd, a London-based property lender that entered administration last month, Bloomberg News reported on Friday.

The U.S. private-credit firm, which manages $307 billion in assets, financed the riskiest slice of loans originated by Century, a bridging lender focused on high-end central London property, the report said, citing people familiar with the matter.

Century entered administration with about 95 million pounds of total debt, days before a larger rival, Market Financial Solutions, fell into a UK form of insolvency, according to the report.

Both companies relied on funding lines from private credit firms and banks to originate short-term property loans for borrowers who often cannot secure traditional bank financing, typically at higher interest rates, Bloomberg News reported, and added that Century had not been accused of fraud by any creditor.

More at link

Anytime the Carlyle Group has a bad day is a good day for the rest of us.

At least for Blackrock

BlackRock is the world's largest asset manager, not a bank, managing over $10 trillion in assets for clients rather than holding deposits or lending its own money. As a fiduciary, it invests funds on behalf of clients, avoiding the direct balance sheet risks of traditional banking.

see more at:



How asset managers like BlackRock took over the world

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2025/06/16/how-asset-managers-like-blackrock-took-over-the-world-vulture-capitalism-extract-grace-blakeley/

I was being pithy. Maybe I could have said “effectively a bank run.” People panic when they think they can’t get their money.

Especially since “regular” banks are insolvent to start with. They depend heavily on one thing: belief. The public has to believe a bank is solid. Once belief fails danger is beating down the door.

for its clients.

And some people have a higher appetite for risk

triggered the 2008 Bush recession.

Does this mean regular banks could start doing this to us soon - for example, Wells Fargo or bank of America? Does this mean we may never have access to our money? Please explain it like I am a five year old. BTW, March is TBI awareness month. (Traumatic brain injury)

https://www.bankrate.com/banking/savings/regulation-d/



Regulation D used to limit savings account withdrawals to six per month. The Federal Reserve scrapped that rule in April 2020. But many banks pretended nothing changed and still enforce the old six-withdrawal limit — because they can. Here’s what you need to know and how to avoid getting hit with unnecessary fees.

What is Regulation D?

Regulation D was a Federal Reserve rule that required banks to maintain reserves against certain types of deposits and limited “convenient” withdrawals from savings accounts to six per statement cycle. The rule distinguished between two types of accounts:



The six-withdrawal cap applied specifically to “convenient” transactions — things like online transfers, bill pay, automatic payments and debit card purchases. In-person withdrawals and ATM transactions were always unlimited. Why the limit existed: The Federal Reserve used reserve requirements as a tool to control monetary policy. By limiting withdrawals on savings accounts, regulators helped banks maintain predictable cash reserves and drew a clear regulatory line between checking (reservable) and savings (non-reservable) deposits.

The 2020 rule change: What actually happened..................................

snip

Banks and credit unions with Federal deposit insurance are safe.

If they have “Federal”, “national”, “Fed”, “National Association” or “N.A” in their name they’re probably covered by Federal deposit insurance. Call your bank or credit union to double check.

My recently deceased husband used to help me with a lot of these things, once I had my accident. Now I feel completely unsupported. I appreciate you.

The Trump Administration is Targeting the FDIC, Putting Americans’ Financial Wellbeing at Risk - Public Citizen https://share.google/Hfi90u5mQN1cLdeLT

Will be there for us under this administration. FEMA, Homeland security, ice, and everything else under the Trump umbrella will do whatever the hell it wants. We do not enter into their equations.

Bank customers' deposits are insured by the FDIC in case of bank collapse.

The rich assholes who invested in Blackrock and other private equity funds are not insured by the federal government for their losses. They could still get bailed out, however, like the government did with so many corporations did in 2008/2009.

The worry is it could trigger a panic and a larger meltdown of our economy.

and hurts tRump, Musk, and every other shady S.O.B. I'm buying the first round at the pub.

the hell I hid it! Don't have much but it's all I have being alone.

Today I withdrew money from the bank because I needed to buy something and knew I emptied my wallet yesterday. Well, when I went to put the money in my wallet, there was a couple of hundred in there. I spent the entire day trying to figure out how it got there. No activity on any of my bank accounts! This is going to sound kooky but I think it is my deceased husband. He has done all kinds of things since he passed. The leaking faucet? Fixed. My dog will bark at nothing in the room. The lights blink. A couple of days ago I wanted the overhead light turned off but I did not want to get up. It turned off by itself. When I got up, I checked and the bulbs were not burned out.

But I get the money thing, although yours and mine are opposites. Did your tastes change at all? Things I used to love to eat I really do not like any more!

Regular banks operate under a different set of regulations then companies like Blackrock. If your money is in a checking account, you have unlimited access to it. Savings accounts appear to have some limit to the number of monthly withdrawals but, unless your savings account has a dollar amount limit on withdrawals (frankly not something I have ever seen. Check with your bank if you have a savings account), it shouldn't be an issue. Blackrock, on the other hand, is an investment company for people that are so rich that they can afford to risk significant amounts of money on what are frequently very risky investments, i.e. the 1%. Probably not either one of us.

regular parachutes for the most well-connected accredited investors, everyone else goes down with the plane.

warning of possible problems with the banking system a while ago.

?si=TDZZ5aCCxKqtk3bv

Especially if you consider that Bitcoin is slightly lower and silver is higher than when the video came out. They pointed to those two as a problem for JP Morgan.

I think if you did, she would probably change the subject to Epstein, and we might make progress on that front.

Thanks for the thread riversedge

He'll get right on it. Well, as soon as the plane lands and the opening act for the Lee Greenwood concert scheduled for the Bosie High School gymnasium is over.

lining up government funded flights to see his "girlfriend." Then he'll have to find someone to inflate her. 😉

"THE STOCK MARKET IS AT 50!... wait... THE STOCK MARKET IS AT 49!... wait... THE STOCK MARKET IS AT 48!... wait... THE STOCK MARKET IS AT 47... wait..."

...where that dimwit refers to the Dow as dollars!
The old "tell us you know nothing about xyz, without saying I know nothing about xyz".

before she's shooed out for obeying orders.

Seems pretty huge to me

Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan warned about this when he said there were cockroaches hiding that worried him in private equity.

That said, this happened last week with Blue Owl too.

So, I ask those with (what you thought were) large accounts - did you actually fall for the suggestion that your money is really yours? The global oligarchy finds your notions amusing.

Than the Savings and Loans Scandal.

The issue, I would assume, is the same thing that always causes these things to spiral out of control is the people that rush in to grab what they can, causes others to do the same and it starts eating its own tail until is collapses.

This could just be a minor hiccup or total economic collapse. It really depends on how people react to it.

That's my two cents. I'm just a person on the intertubes.

no matter what he says about cutting SNAP and healthcare for millions of people. He's still spending OUR money like well, like it's OURS... because he never spends his own money on anything! All these golf vacations he takes every weekend... our tax dollars pay for those -- for all the secret service around him, and all their room costs and even trump's golfing costs! Chances are, we pay for his meals, too... while he takes food out of our mouths.

And let's not even get started on the "building projects" we're going to pay for that we don't want. We don't have the money for food for the people, but damn! trump has to have a new building with his name on it someplace... and WE pick up the tab.

And then there's all these countries he's bombing and the war of choice he started in Iran, along with Bib. I don't see Bibi pumping money into humanitarian causes for the US... we only supply the money and bombs for Bibi, he owes us nothing. He seems to owe everything to trump and putin.

When you add up what he spends of OUR money on a daily basis, is it any wonder he had DOGE going in and cutting every bit of money from every department they could? He wasn't going to spend any of HIS money on this crap.

He's taking us into complete and utter Great Depression 2.0 -- and none of us are capable of handling it this time around. The number of people who could grow their own food is pretty damned slim. I'm one of them, and I've tried. Got a house surrounded completely by shades tree. Great for lowering the energy bill... not so damned great when seeds and plants need sunlight to thrive. And there are a hell of a lot more people worse off than I am. At least I'm still in my own, fully-owned house -- as long as I can keep making the tax payments... which, of course, are going up again along with the house insurance. Nope, folks... this man spends money like its water because it's not his, and no one is stopping him. We're well into national bankruptcy, IMO.

Can you just imagine how the REPUKES would be howling if the DEMS were wasting money the way the orange man is? 40 billion to Argentina, building a new ballroom, etc...It never stops with this corrupt administration. Rape allegations, bribes, It just wont stop!!! Senators and house members from both sides!! Where are you?

during an intense Truth and Reconciliation meeting....

I have no doubt that many are cowed by trump's evil. They've never seen anything like it before, and they fear for their families. I can appreciate that, but I do not excuse it. Not when an entire country... and all the people within that country... are suffering his delusions of grandeur. This is where I place some of our democratic reps. They've seen what happens to those who stand up to trump. I remember Nancy Pelosi tearing up the State of the Union notes, and faux-clapping at trump. And I remember what happened to her husband. I remember the representative who lost her life and her husband to trump's maga enraged minions. And those "near misses" who still have their lives, but are forever changed by what they've experienced simply by trying to be "our representatives." I weep for them... for what they went thru; for what they tried; for the loss it has meant to us.

I have no such feelings towards the repub reps. Yes, there have been a few; but even those few differ from trump only on process and not ideology. Look at Liz Cheney. She stood up to trump... lost it all, politically. But did that change how she sees the idealistic America in her mind? Did it make her suddenly more empathetic towards life? No... she's still into all politics all big money. And then we have such stalwarts as Issa (whom I detest), mullin, miller. These are devil incarnates. Nostradamus never prophesied an Anti-christ who would destroy the world. He warned of *many* anti-christs, and we're seeing a slew of them that people in their stupidity and avarice keep electing over and over again. The question becomes how do we deal with them when (and if) this enormous evil is ever turned back? And how do we do it without sullying our own souls? Right now, I have to admit, that last question is pretty low on my list of priorities. I just want them out of power and out of position or job that could ever cause harm to another living being -- human or otherwise.

None of us little folks can slide our little 401k's around with mercurial speed and ease. They can ride this out with the rest of us. If you are too big to fail, you were too big to begin with. If we all go broke, we'll be in good company.

NEW YORK, March 6 (Reuters) - BlackRock said on Friday it has limited withdrawals from a flagship debt fund after a surge in redemption requests, as investor worries mount around the $2 trillion private credit industry.

Shares of the world's largest asset manager fell 6.7% on the New York Stock Exchange, amid a broader market selloff after worse-than-expected U.S. jobs data and escalating U.S.-Israeli war against Iran.

Sentiment has soured around private credit in recent months, and retail investors are increasingly asking for their money back from funds like BlackRock's $26 billion HPS Corporate Lending Fund (HLEND), which were designed to be open to wealthy individuals.
"It should serve as a warning sign for the industry and the rulemakers about the downside of illiquid funds for retail investors," said Greggory Warren, senior stock analyst at Morningstar.

Last year's bankruptcies of a U.S. auto parts supplier and a subprime auto lender, along with the collapse of a UK mortgage lender last week, have raised questions about lending standards.

Earlier this week, mounting requests prompted rival Blackstone to lift the usual 5% redemption limit on a $82 billion fund to 7%, while the company and its employees invested $400 million to allow all requests to be met. Blue Owl bought back 15.4% of one of its funds in January.

into the pot.

i expect this to push them into turbo mode. PE is going to ramp up what PE does. pressure is going to increase greatly on companies the fund is invested in to either perform or get shut down, in order to put that money back it BR's pockets.

and i think the 64k question is who is so anxious to get their money out so quick? is it Middle East investors that need liquidity because of this weeks events? or investors who predict companies invested in to perform badly in the trump economy? we'll most likely never know.

that this problem with private equity is quarantined from the wider market. It most certainly isn't. If those who pull the strings are seeing a storm coming, that storm is big.

BlackRock investors wanted to take 9.3% out yesterday. That's a signal. So is the write-down of the Infinite Commercial Holdings loan and the Blue Owl Capital mishigas.

I think we need to strap in.

Posted this once before

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/why-private-credit-is-creating-major-concerns-among-economists

or should I say lambda? ƛ

Stock market wasn’t enough, huh?

but of course rich people expect socialism for the wealthy... rugged capitalism for anyone else.

That's bad... almost as bad as the job market.