Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(22,206 posts)
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 02:35 PM Wednesday

Trump expected the SCOTUS to shut down Newsom's response to Republican gerrymandering bullsh*t, and then, OOOPS.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that California may use a new congressional map approved by voters.

Justices rejected arguments from Republicans asking the court to block district lines they claimed were rigged in favor of Democratic candidates, and their decision was issued as a one-sentence order that did not provide explanation or dissent, reported NBC News.

Democratic legislators drew up the map and voters approved the mid-decade redistricting plan that could give the party a chance to gain five more seats in this fall's midterm elections.

Gov. Gavin Newsom promoted the measure in response to a new map passed last summer by Republicans in Texas to give themselves five additional favorable matchups, but similar efforts have found mixed success around the country.

https://www.rawstory.com/california-supreme-court-redistricting/

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

C_U_L8R

(49,108 posts)
1. What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 02:38 PM
Wednesday

Silly republicans never think their stupid schemes have consequences.

malaise

(294,080 posts)
8. If the VP's response to an execution is "for what",
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 04:34 PM
Wednesday

It is pellucidly clear that shame is not part of their make up.

peppertree

(23,186 posts)
12. The same way they run interference for a child rapist and Russian asset
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 05:07 PM
Wednesday

With a palm outstretched behind their backs.

malaise

(294,080 posts)
7. Unlike the ReTHUG slop, the Democratic sauce was voted
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 04:31 PM
Wednesday

for by citizens.
That is all

Torchlight

(6,512 posts)
3. GOP - hoisted by their own precedent
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 02:55 PM
Wednesday

GOP kinda reminds me of the Doyle Lonnegan role in the film, The Sting: "What was I supposed to do, call him for cheating better than me in front of the others?".

intheflow

(30,070 posts)
4. The reason this suceeded and others haven't is
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 03:18 PM
Wednesday

that Newsom put it to a vote, and the voters want this. As opposed to TX Republicans who just did their own shit without asking anyone.

MagickMuffin

(18,203 posts)
6. Ya don't gotta tell me about it, I didn't get a say, just like handing over our voter rolls
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 04:27 PM
Wednesday


greg abbott is the absolute worse governor Texas has ever had. and that's sayin somethin since he followed Rick Perry and GW Bush.


Miles Archer

(22,206 posts)
11. "With no dissents, the justices rejected emergency appeals from California Republicans and President Trump's lawyers...
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 05:02 PM
Wednesday

...who claimed the map was a racial gerrymander to benefit Latinos, not a partisan effort to bolster Democrats."

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2026-02-04/supreme-court-rejects-gop-challenge-to-californias-new-election-map

ms liberty

(11,062 posts)
13. IMO, these one sentence rulings are solely to allow the conservative majority to someday
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 05:10 PM
Wednesday

Reverse engineer their arguments to try to minimize their culpability in this mess.

Not gonna work, aholes.

dsc

(53,338 posts)
15. It was the bare minimum the court could do to show they weren't a bunch of hacks
Wed Feb 4, 2026, 06:30 PM
Wednesday

in the decision for the Texas case, where the evidence race was involved was orders of magnitude more, Alito made clear that he thought the CA gerrymander was political not racial.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump expected the SCOTUS...