General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge orders readmission of law student who posted 'Jews must be abolished'
Nov 25 (Reuters) - A federal judge has ordered the University of Florida to reinstate a law student it expelled for making controversial statements about race and religion, including a post on X that said Jews must be abolished by any means necessary.
Chief U.S. District Judge Allen Winsor in Tallahassee granted a preliminary injunction, opens new tab on Monday requiring plaintiff Preston Damsky be readmitted to the Gainesville law school for now, finding that the school had not shown his statements online and in academic papers were true threats of violence and that the expulsion likely violated his free speech rights under the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment.
The University, of course, has an interest in maintaining order, but it has no interest in violating the First Amendment to achieve that goal, Winsor said.
Damskys attorney, Anthony Sabatini, on Tuesday called the ruling a big win for the First Amendment. He said his client had missed an entire semester of law school due to the dispute.
A university spokesperson declined to comment on Tuesday.
more...
stopdiggin
(14,831 posts)If this was a private place of work - this ass-hat would not be getting his job back. The government however (with a public institution standing in its stead ... ) It's been long established that ugly speech does not contravene ...
And still - I think this ruling is probably erroneous. We'll see I guess,
exboyfil
(18,325 posts)Whether he is talking about Jews or any other group.
AZJonnie
(2,475 posts)Abolishing typically means "casting aside", "kicking out", etc, and is not typically applied to "people", but rather to "practices". Distasteful and hateful as the sentence is, I think the court's decision is at least defensible insofar as it seems like protected speech. MHO, fwiw.
RandySF
(80,289 posts)AZJonnie
(2,475 posts)for constitutional wiggle-room in a situation where the 1A might logically apply, such as this one.
It's almost like the dude specifically chose this word to have exactly this courtroom fight, if I'm in CT mode.