General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHegseth 2016 : Saying there should be consequences for people who commit war crimes
Heres Pete Hegseth in 2016 saying there should be consequences for people who commit war crimesthat members of the military shouldnt follow illegal orders from the President: If youre doing something that is just completely unlawful and ruthless, then there is a consequence for that. Thats why the military said it wont follow unlawful orders from their commander in chief. 🤔
Link to tweet
BOSSHOG
(44,275 posts)Its in the constitution. Somewhere. Look it up.
Republicans are member of the party of responsibility. It would take sick demented communist liberal democrats to say that means republicans are responsible. For anything.
sinkingfeeling
(56,905 posts)FascismIsDeath
(3 posts)I'm a moron who actually bothers trying to refute people in the "comments" sections of various social media sites. This right here is a curb stomp straight to the back of the head of all the erroneous talking points about Senator Kelly and the others.
canetoad
(19,925 posts)About this guy Mike Nellis but not on Twitter. He has a Bluesky account.
https://bsky.app/profile/mikenellis.bsky.social
intheflow
(29,914 posts)Hes not bouncing around the stage, manically talking about masculinity standards and warriors ethos while telling top military brass to stop being pussies and get to war crimeing, er, war fighting. I mean, Im sure there were unhinged moments during whatever presentation this was, but the difference between this dude and the guy I see today makes me think hes gone off the wagon. If not with alcohol, maybe Adderall addiction. 🤔