Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat a federal ban on THC-infused drinks and snacks could mean for the hemp industry
https://apnews.com/article/hemp-thc-drinks-ban-law-8d77842cb250291a178db6f9d39f8b7e
Cans of seltzer containing THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, speed down the canning line at Indeed Brewing in Minneapolis on Thursday, Nov. 20, 2025. (AP Photo/Steve Karnowski)
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) The production lines at Indeed Brewing moved quickly, the cans filling not with beer, but with THC-infused seltzer. The product, which features the compound that gets cannabis users high, has been a lifeline at Indeed and other craft breweries as alcohol sales have fallen in recent years.
But that boom looks set to come to a crashing halt. Buried in the bill that ended the federal government shutdown this month was a provision to ban those drinks, along with other impairing beverages and snacks made from hemp, which have proliferated across the country in recent years. Now the $24 billion hemp industry is scrambling to save itself before the provision takes effect in November 2026.
Its a big deal, said Ryan Bandy, Indeeds chief business officer. It would be a mess for our breweries, for our industry, and obviously for a lot of people who like these things. Heres what to know about the looming ban on impairing products derived from hemp.
snip
We are very hopeful that cooler heads will prevail, said Jonathan Miller, general counsel of the industry group U.S. Hemp Roundtable. If they really thought there was a health emergency, there would be no year-long period. The federal ban would jeopardize more than 300,000 jobs while costing states $1.5 billion in lost tax money, the group says.
snip
Here are the 25 Democratic caucus Senators (led by Shaheen, who whipped to keep it in) who voted to keep the McTurtle ban in the bill:
https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1191/vote_119_1_00614.htm#position
Alsobrooks (D-MD)
Blunt Rochester (D-DE)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Coons (D-DE)
Cortez Masto (D-NV)
Duckworth (D-IL)
Durbin (D-IL)
Fetterman (D-PA)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Hassan (D-NH)
Heinrich (D-NM)
Hirono (D-HI)
Kim (D-NJ)
King (I-ME)
Lujan (D-NM)
Murray (D-WA)
Padilla (D-CA)
Reed (D-RI)
Rosen (D-NV)
Schiff (D-CA)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Slotkin (D-MI)
Van Hollen (D-MD)
Warner (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What a federal ban on THC-infused drinks and snacks could mean for the hemp industry (Original Post)
Celerity
Sunday
OP
Blues Heron
(8,111 posts)1. This timeline sucks as the millennials say
PatSeg
(51,631 posts)2. How many jobs can this administration destroy?
Meanwhile, I'm stocking up on my hemp gummies.
GreatGazoo
(4,335 posts)3. Big Pharma strikes again
$300 million buys profit-protecting legislation
https://www.statista.com/statistics/257364/top-lobbying-industries-in-the-us/?srsltid=AfmBOooRrDtgmlUGZfpMakEpXv5e_UmdIn2U_GKXUajsFzhlj3VleMOA
BBbats
(273 posts)4. I'm Sure The Alcohol Industry Had A Big Say In This.
Younger people aren't drinking like they used to.
Isn't McConnell a shill for the liquor industry?
Blue_Adept
(6,496 posts)6. It's not going to turn younger folks onto drinking by removing this either
Since so many are on various medications for a lot of different reasons, they're wary of drinking much because of the interactions with the drugs they take.
Sequoia
(12,708 posts)5. Wretched. And Schiff is on the list.
What are they afraid of?