General Discussion

red dog 1

(32,241 posts) Wed Nov 26, 2025, 07:19 PM Nov 26

Witkoff committed TREASON. SAY IT!

Witkoff committed TREASON. SAY IT!

www.ms.now/chris-jansin...
— Celiene O'Hara (@celiene-ohara.bsky.social) 2025-11-27T00:05:54.718Z

https://democraticunderground.com/1016418152

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Witkoff committed TREASON. SAY IT! (Original Post) red dog 1 Nov 26 OP

TREASON Clouds Passing Nov 26 #1

U. S. Constitution Art. III, §3, cl. 1 rsdsharp Nov 26 #2

How about over 3 hundred million witnesses. yellow dahlia Nov 26 #7

Read the definition again. His conduct isn't even close to treason. rsdsharp Nov 26 #8

Transcript usonian Nov 26 #3

I agree gab13by13 Nov 26 #4

If we want to make hay from this, saying he betrayed the country won't get us anywhere RockRaven Nov 26 #5

... already did... B.See Nov 26 #6

We are not now at war with Russia---- unless I missed a "truth post" somewhere--- Jack Valentino Nov 26 #9

Clouds Passing

(6,697 posts)

1. TREASON

Reply to red dog 1 (Original post)

Wed Nov 26, 2025, 07:31 PM

Nov 26

rsdsharp

(11,638 posts)

2. U. S. Constitution Art. III, §3, cl. 1

Reply to red dog 1 (Original post)

Wed Nov 26, 2025, 07:42 PM

Nov 26

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

yellow dahlia

(4,089 posts)

7. How about over 3 hundred million witnesses.

Reply to rsdsharp (Reply #2)

Wed Nov 26, 2025, 10:17 PM

Nov 26

rsdsharp

(11,638 posts)

8. Read the definition again. His conduct isn't even close to treason.

Reply to yellow dahlia (Reply #7)

Wed Nov 26, 2025, 10:57 PM

Nov 26

People throw the word around too casually.

usonian

(22,849 posts)

3. Transcript

Reply to red dog 1 (Original post)

Wed Nov 26, 2025, 07:44 PM

Nov 26

https://pastebin.com/raw/8xkqEHtg

gab13by13

(30,849 posts)

4. I agree

Reply to red dog 1 (Original post)

Wed Nov 26, 2025, 07:44 PM

Nov 26

Anyone else calling it treason? Any Congressional Dems?

RockRaven

(18,528 posts)

5. If we want to make hay from this, saying he betrayed the country won't get us anywhere

Reply to red dog 1 (Original post)

Wed Nov 26, 2025, 07:45 PM

Nov 26

because the only way to get rid of him is by making The Dotard want to get rid of him. Treason doesn't do that. Sad but true.

So it has to be framed as "he betrayed Tr*mp" and "he insulted Tr*mp" and "he belittled Tr*mp" and "he mocked Tr*mp" and "he fooled Tr*mp" and "he manipulated Tr*mp" and "he lied to Tr*mp" and "he got rich tricking Tr*mp" and "he got paid Tr*mp's money."

B.See

(7,498 posts)

6. ... already did...

Reply to red dog 1 (Original post)

Wed Nov 26, 2025, 07:51 PM

Nov 26

https://democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=20831593

Jack Valentino

(4,127 posts)

9. We are not now at war with Russia---- unless I missed a "truth post" somewhere---

Reply to red dog 1 (Original post)

Wed Nov 26, 2025, 11:07 PM

Nov 26

Since they are not technically an enemy, the legal definition of 'treason'
does not apply here--- legally, Russia is not an 'enemy' of the United States...

although 'in spirit', that is another thing altogether....

Reply to this discussion